These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29787593)

  • 1. Improving the effectiveness of performance feedback by considering personality traits and task demands.
    Swift V; Peterson JB
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197810. PubMed ID: 29787593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The impact of feedback valence and communication style on intrinsic motivation in middle childhood: Experimental evidence and generalization across individual differences.
    Mabbe E; Soenens B; De Muynck GJ; Vansteenkiste M
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2018 Jun; 170():134-160. PubMed ID: 29471146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effect of feedback mode and task difficulty on quality of timing decisions in a zero-sum game.
    Tikuisis P; Vartanian O; Mandel DR
    Hum Factors; 2014 Sep; 56(6):1062-76. PubMed ID: 25277017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Adjustment, depression, and minimal goal setting: the moderating effect of performance feedback.
    Catanzaro SJ
    J Pers; 1991 Jun; 59(2):243-61. PubMed ID: 1880701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Relationship of personality to performance motivation: a meta-analytic review.
    Judge TA; Ilies R
    J Appl Psychol; 2002 Aug; 87(4):797-807. PubMed ID: 12184582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. When the going gets tough, the differentiated keep going: cybernetic self-determination, daily obstacles, and persistent goal pursuit.
    Moeller SK; Troop-Gordon W; Robinson MD
    J Psychol; 2015; 149(5):427-42. PubMed ID: 25975572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Speed of Processing and Personality: The Influence of Personality and Extrinsic Feedback on the Performance of Cognitive Tasks.
    Wong MYC; Chung PK; Leung KM
    Behav Sci (Basel); 2020 Apr; 10(4):. PubMed ID: 32276376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A cybernetic model of global personality traits.
    Van Egeren LF
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2009 May; 13(2):92-108. PubMed ID: 19351887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Predicting motivational regulations in physical education: the interplay between dispositional goal orientations, motivational climate and perceived competence.
    Standage M; Duda JL; Ntoumanis N
    J Sports Sci; 2003 Aug; 21(8):631-47. PubMed ID: 12875314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The role of organizational insiders' developmental feedback and proactive personality on newcomers' performance: an interactionist perspective.
    Li N; Harris TB; Boswell WR; Xie Z
    J Appl Psychol; 2011 Nov; 96(6):1317-27. PubMed ID: 21688879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Individual differences in fundamental social motives.
    Neel R; Kenrick DT; White AE; Neuberg SL
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2016 Jun; 110(6):887-907. PubMed ID: 26371400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Neuroticism and responsiveness to error feedback: adaptive self-regulation versus affective reactivity.
    Robinson MD; Moeller SK; Fetterman AK
    J Pers; 2010 Oct; 78(5):1469-96. PubMed ID: 20663025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of negative feedback on tension and subsequent performance: the main and interactive effects of goal content and conscientiousness.
    Cianci AM; Klein HJ; Seijts GH
    J Appl Psychol; 2010 Jul; 95(4):618-30. PubMed ID: 20604585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effects of augmented feedback on students' perceptions and performance.
    Fredenburg KB; Lee AM; Solmon M
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2001 Sep; 72(3):232-42. PubMed ID: 11561388
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in response to automation: the five factor model of personality.
    Szalma JL; Taylor GS
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2011 Jun; 17(2):71-96. PubMed ID: 21688932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Enhancing Self-Efficacy and Performance: An Experimental Comparison of Psychological Techniques.
    Wright BJ; O'Halloran PD; Stukas AA
    Res Q Exerc Sport; 2016; 87(1):36-46. PubMed ID: 26523398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of manipulating positive and negative feedback on goal orientations, perceived motivational climate, satisfaction, task choice, perception of ability, and attitude toward physical education lessons.
    Viciana J; Cervelló EM; Ramírez-Lechuga J
    Percept Mot Skills; 2007 Aug; 105(1):67-82. PubMed ID: 17918550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Do participants differ in their cognitive abilities, task motivation, or personality characteristics as a function of time of participation?
    Robison MK; Unsworth N
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Jun; 42(6):897-913. PubMed ID: 26641446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of failure/success feedback and the moderating influence of personality on reward motivation.
    Anand D; Oehlberg KA; Treadway MT; Nusslock R
    Cogn Emot; 2016; 30(3):458-71. PubMed ID: 25759131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Training for vigilance: the effect of knowledge of results format and dispositional optimism and pessimism on performance and stress.
    Szalma JL; Hancock PA; Dember WN; Warm JS
    Br J Psychol; 2006 Feb; 97(Pt 1):115-35. PubMed ID: 16464290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.