BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29788113)

  • 1. Differences in Performance among Test Statistics for Assessing Phylogenomic Model Adequacy.
    Duchêne DA; Duchêne S; Ho SYW
    Genome Biol Evol; 2018 Jun; 10(6):1375-1388. PubMed ID: 29788113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. New Statistical Criteria Detect Phylogenetic Bias Caused by Compositional Heterogeneity.
    Duchêne DA; Duchêne S; Ho SYW
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Jun; 34(6):1529-1534. PubMed ID: 28333201
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. PhyloMAd: efficient assessment of phylogenomic model adequacy.
    Duchêne DA; Duchêne S; Ho SYW
    Bioinformatics; 2018 Jul; 34(13):2300-2301. PubMed ID: 29481585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Excluding Loci With Substitution Saturation Improves Inferences From Phylogenomic Data.
    Duchêne DA; Mather N; Van Der Wal C; Ho SYW
    Syst Biol; 2022 Apr; 71(3):676-689. PubMed ID: 34508605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Detection of implausible phylogenetic inferences using posterior predictive assessment of model fit.
    Brown JM
    Syst Biol; 2014 May; 63(3):334-48. PubMed ID: 24415681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian model adequacy and choice in phylogenetics.
    Bollback JP
    Mol Biol Evol; 2002 Jul; 19(7):1171-80. PubMed ID: 12082136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessment of substitution model adequacy using frequentist and Bayesian methods.
    Ripplinger J; Sullivan J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2010 Dec; 27(12):2790-803. PubMed ID: 20616145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Multispecies Coalescent Model Outperforms Concatenation Across Diverse Phylogenomic Data Sets.
    Jiang X; Edwards SV; Liu L
    Syst Biol; 2020 Jul; 69(4):795-812. PubMed ID: 32011711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Substitution Model Adequacy and Assessing the Reliability of Estimates of Virus Evolutionary Rates and Time Scales.
    Duchêne S; Di Giallonardo F; Holmes EC
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 Jan; 33(1):255-67. PubMed ID: 26416981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The genetic code can cause systematic bias in simple phylogenetic models.
    Whelan S
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):4003-11. PubMed ID: 18852102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluating the Adequacy of Molecular Clock Models Using Posterior Predictive Simulations.
    Duchêne DA; Duchêne S; Holmes EC; Ho SY
    Mol Biol Evol; 2015 Nov; 32(11):2986-95. PubMed ID: 26163668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Analysis of Phylogenomic Tree Space Resolves Relationships Among Marsupial Families.
    Duchêne DA; Bragg JG; Duchêne S; Neaves LE; Potter S; Moritz C; Johnson RN; Ho SYW; Eldridge MDB
    Syst Biol; 2018 May; 67(3):400-412. PubMed ID: 29029231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing adequacy for DNA substitution models.
    Chen W; Kenney T; Bielawski J; Gu H
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Jun; 20(1):349. PubMed ID: 31221105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A class frequency mixture model that adjusts for site-specific amino acid frequencies and improves inference of protein phylogeny.
    Wang HC; Li K; Susko E; Roger AJ
    BMC Evol Biol; 2008 Dec; 8():331. PubMed ID: 19087270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. So many genes, so little time: A practical approach to divergence-time estimation in the genomic era.
    Smith SA; Brown JW; Walker JF
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0197433. PubMed ID: 29772020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An amino acid substitution-selection model adjusts residue fitness to improve phylogenetic estimation.
    Wang HC; Susko E; Roger AJ
    Mol Biol Evol; 2014 Apr; 31(4):779-92. PubMed ID: 24441033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model Adequacy and the Macroevolution of Angiosperm Functional Traits.
    Pennell MW; FitzJohn RG; Cornwell WK; Harmon LJ
    Am Nat; 2015 Aug; 186(2):E33-50. PubMed ID: 26655160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Impact of missing data on phylogenies inferred from empirical phylogenomic data sets.
    Roure B; Baurain D; Philippe H
    Mol Biol Evol; 2013 Jan; 30(1):197-214. PubMed ID: 22930702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Assessing the performance of DNA barcoding using posterior predictive simulations.
    Barley AJ; Thomson RC
    Mol Ecol; 2016 May; 25(9):1944-57. PubMed ID: 26915049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Mitochondrial phylogenomics of early land plants: mitigating the effects of saturation, compositional heterogeneity, and codon-usage bias.
    Liu Y; Cox CJ; Wang W; Goffinet B
    Syst Biol; 2014 Nov; 63(6):862-78. PubMed ID: 25070972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.