These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 297884)

  • 21. A simplified technique for obtaining predictable contacts in posterior composite resin restorations.
    Dragan WB
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Oct; 17(10):655-7. PubMed ID: 3466195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The surface texture of trimmed composite fillings. A scanning electron microscopy study.
    Gray HS; Gavin JB
    N Z Dent J; 1975 Jul; 71(325):139-45. PubMed ID: 1059036
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Posterior composite resin restorations: Part I. Isolation.
    van der Vyver PJ; Bridges PN
    SADJ; 2002 Apr; 57(4):142-6. PubMed ID: 12078332
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Posterior composite resin restorations. Part 3. Matrix systems.
    van der Vyver PJ
    SADJ; 2002 Jun; 57(6):221-6. PubMed ID: 12229077
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved proximal margin adaptation of Class II composite resin restorations by use of light-reflecting wedges.
    Lutz F; Krejci I; Luescher B; Oldenburg TR
    Quintessence Int; 1986 Oct; 17(10):659-64. PubMed ID: 3466196
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Cutting procedures for composite resins, especially posterior composite resins].
    Ikeda T; Saitoh Y; Takano F
    Tsurumi Shigaku; 1983 Jan; 9(1):17-28. PubMed ID: 6572458
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Determining smoothness of polished microfilled composite resins.
    Reinhardt JW; Denehy GE; Chan KC; Rittman BR; Heitkamp DJ; Smith TF
    J Prosthet Dent; 1983 Apr; 49(4):485-90. PubMed ID: 6573494
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Contouring, finishing, and polishing Class 5 restorative materials.
    Hondrum SO; Fernández R
    Oper Dent; 1997; 22(1):30-6. PubMed ID: 9227125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. The glass-ionomer-lined cervical composite restoration: an in vitro investigation.
    Brown KB; Swartz ML; Cochran MA; Phillips RW
    Oper Dent; 1993; 18(1):17-27. PubMed ID: 8332536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Comparative study of the polishing of composite resins with the same sequence of abrasives].
    Pasin D; Villela L
    Quintessencia; 1977 Dec; 4(12):35-42. PubMed ID: 292009
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Preventive resin restorations: etching patterns, resin tag morphology and the enamel-resin interface.
    Hicks MJ
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1984; 51(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 6371082
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Margins of composite preparations, danger of secondary etching, scanning electron microscopy aspects].
    Lamiable D
    Chir Dent Fr; 1986 Jan; 56(323):35-9. PubMed ID: 3519114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Polishing occlusal surfaces of direct Class II composite restorations in vivo.
    Jung M; Hornung K; Klimek J
    Oper Dent; 2005; 30(2):139-46. PubMed ID: 15853097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Microleakage comparison in opaque and transparent matrix systems.
    Scherer W; Caliskan F; Kaim JM; Cooper H; Zimmerman M
    Gen Dent; 1989; 37(6):482-4. PubMed ID: 2639842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Scanning analysis of neoteric composite systems as to enamel-composite bond and surface integrity.
    Birtcil RF; Leung RL; Martin DW; Judes H; Stark MM
    J Calif Dent Assoc (1961); 1977 Aug; 5(8):58-64. PubMed ID: 381314
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using the separator for a Class 3 composite resin.
    Beamish LW
    Oper Dent; 1983; 8(3):103-5. PubMed ID: 6583664
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. [Our experiences with transparent cervical matrices].
    Strestíková H; Sazmová V; Vinická M
    Prakt Zubn Lek; 1987 Apr; 35(3):70-5. PubMed ID: 3474602
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Scanning electron microscopy evaluation after 2 years of a posterior composite: a possible amalgam substitute?].
    Pierleoni P; Pagavino G
    Arch Stomatol (Napoli); 1984; 25(1):151-61. PubMed ID: 6599258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-year performance of glass-ceramic insert-resin composite restorations: clinical and scanning electron microscopic evaluation.
    Kiremitçi A; Bolay S; Gürgan S
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Jul; 29(7):417-21. PubMed ID: 9759057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [SEM study of the margins of glass ionomer cement restorations after thermal loading].
    Reich E
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1986 Aug; 41(8):747-50. PubMed ID: 3464400
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.