BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

899 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29788552)

  • 1. An analytical dose-averaged LET calculation algorithm considering the off-axis LET enhancement by secondary protons for spot-scanning proton therapy.
    Hirayama S; Matsuura T; Ueda H; Fujii Y; Fujii T; Takao S; Miyamoto N; Shimizu S; Fujimoto R; Umegaki K; Shirato H
    Med Phys; 2018 Jul; 45(7):3404-3416. PubMed ID: 29788552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Analysis of the track- and dose-averaged LET and LET spectra in proton therapy using the geant4 Monte Carlo code.
    Guan F; Peeler C; Bronk L; Geng C; Taleei R; Randeniya S; Ge S; Mirkovic D; Grosshans D; Mohan R; Titt U
    Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 42(11):6234-47. PubMed ID: 26520716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Validation of linear energy transfer computed in a Monte Carlo dose engine of a commercial treatment planning system.
    Wagenaar D; Tran LT; Meijers A; Marmitt GG; Souris K; Bolst D; James B; Biasi G; Povoli M; Kok A; Traneus E; van Goethem MJ; Langendijk JA; Rosenfeld AB; Both S
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Jan; 65(2):025006. PubMed ID: 31801119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A pencil beam algorithm for magnetic resonance image-guided proton therapy.
    Padilla-Cabal F; Georg D; Fuchs H
    Med Phys; 2018 May; 45(5):2195-2204. PubMed ID: 29532490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An initial systematic study of the linear energy transfer distributions of a proton beam under a transverse magnetic field.
    Fujii Y; Ueda H; Umegaki K; Matsuura T
    Med Phys; 2022 Mar; 49(3):1839-1852. PubMed ID: 35124798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Physical and biological impacts of collimator-scattered protons in spot-scanning proton therapy.
    Ueno K; Matsuura T; Hirayama S; Takao S; Ueda H; Matsuo Y; Yoshimura T; Umegaki K
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 20(7):48-57. PubMed ID: 31237090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hybrid 3D analytical linear energy transfer calculation algorithm based on precalculated data from Monte Carlo simulations.
    Deng W; Ding X; Younkin JE; Shen J; Bues M; Schild SE; Patel SH; Liu W
    Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 47(2):745-752. PubMed ID: 31758864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A kernel-based algorithm for the spectral fluence of clinical proton beams to calculate dose-averaged LET and other dosimetric quantities of interest.
    Bertolet A; Cortés-Giraldo MA; Souris K; Carabe A
    Med Phys; 2020 Jun; 47(6):2495-2505. PubMed ID: 32124463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Application of dose kernel calculation using a simplified Monte Carlo method to treatment plan for scanned proton beams.
    Mizutani S; Takada Y; Kohno R; Hotta K; Tansho R; Akimoto T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):315-327. PubMed ID: 27074456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dosimetric evaluation of a commercial proton spot scanning Monte-Carlo dose algorithm: comparisons against measurements and simulations.
    Saini J; Maes D; Egan A; Bowen SR; St James S; Janson M; Wong T; Bloch C
    Phys Med Biol; 2017 Sep; 62(19):7659-7681. PubMed ID: 28749373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monte Carlo simulations of a low energy proton beamline for radiobiological experiments.
    Dahle TJ; Rykkelid AM; Stokkevåg CH; Mairani A; Görgen A; Edin NJ; Rørvik E; Fjæra LF; Malinen E; Ytre-Hauge KS
    Acta Oncol; 2017 Jun; 56(6):779-786. PubMed ID: 28464743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sensitivity analysis of Monte Carlo model of a gantry-mounted passively scattered proton system.
    Baradaran-Ghahfarokhi M; Reynoso F; Prusator MT; Sun B; Zhao T
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):26-37. PubMed ID: 31898873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analytical calculation of proton linear energy transfer in voxelized geometries including secondary protons.
    Sanchez-Parcerisa D; Cortés-Giraldo MA; Dolney D; Kondrla M; Fager M; Carabe A
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 61(4):1705-21. PubMed ID: 26840945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Analytical linear energy transfer model including secondary particles: calculations along the central axis of the proton pencil beam.
    Marsolat F; De Marzi L; Pouzoulet F; Mazal A
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Jan; 61(2):740-57. PubMed ID: 26732530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of linear energy transfer scoring techniques in Monte Carlo simulations of proton beams.
    Granville DA; Sawakuchi GO
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Jul; 60(14):N283-91. PubMed ID: 26147442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Benchmarking a GATE/Geant4 Monte Carlo model for proton beams in magnetic fields.
    Padilla-Cabal F; Alejandro Fragoso J; Franz Resch A; Georg D; Fuchs H
    Med Phys; 2020 Jan; 47(1):223-233. PubMed ID: 31661559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A linear relationship for the LET-dependence of Gafchromic EBT3 film in spot-scanning proton therapy.
    Anderson SE; Grams MP; Wan Chan Tseung H; Furutani KM; Beltran CJ
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Mar; 64(5):055015. PubMed ID: 30673655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Segment-averaged LET concept and analytical calculation from microdosimetric quantities in proton radiation therapy.
    Bertolet A; Baratto-Roldán A; Cortés-Giraldo MA; Carabe-Fernandez A
    Med Phys; 2019 Sep; 46(9):4204-4214. PubMed ID: 31228264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A benchmarking method to evaluate the accuracy of a commercial proton monte carlo pencil beam scanning treatment planning system.
    Lin L; Huang S; Kang M; Hiltunen P; Vanderstraeten R; Lindberg J; Siljamaki S; Wareing T; Davis I; Barnett A; McGhee J; Simone CB; Solberg TD; McDonough JE; Ainsley C
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Mar; 18(2):44-49. PubMed ID: 28300385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A linear energy transfer distributions computation method for inhomogeneous medium by using the water equivalent ratio approximation.
    Yan N; Wu C; Zhou Y; Liao W; Liu J; Pu Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2024 Mar; 200(4):325-332. PubMed ID: 37850312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 45.