These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

411 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29788776)

  • 1. Lenstar® LS 900 vs Pentacam®-AXL: Comparative study of ocular biometric measurements and intraocular lens power calculation.
    Pereira JMM; Neves A; Alfaiate P; Santos M; Aragão H; Sousa JC
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Nov; 28(6):645-651. PubMed ID: 29788776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of two biometers: A swept-source optical coherence tomography and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    El Chehab H; Agard E; Dot C
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2019 Sep; 29(5):547-554. PubMed ID: 30295063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multicenter study of optical low-coherence interferometry and partial-coherence interferometry optical biometers with patients from the United States and China.
    Hoffer KJ; Shammas HJ; Savini G; Huang J
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2016 Jan; 42(1):62-7. PubMed ID: 26948779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparison of anterior segment parameters and axial length measurements performed on a Scheimpflug device with biometry function and a reference optical biometer.
    Muzyka-Woźniak M; Oleszko A
    Int Ophthalmol; 2019 May; 39(5):1115-1122. PubMed ID: 29700651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of the biometric measurements obtained using noncontact optical biometers LenStar LS 900 and IOL Master V.5.
    Kołodziejczyk W; Gałecki T; Łazicka-Gałecka M; Szaflik J
    Klin Oczna; 2011; 113(1-3):47-51. PubMed ID: 21853951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison between Lenstar LS 900 non-contact biometry and OcuScan RXP contact biometry for task delegation].
    El Chehab H; Giraud JM; Le Corre A; Chave N; Durand F; Kuter S; Ract-Madoux G; Swalduz B; Mourgues G; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Mar; 34(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 21257228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Comparison of Lenstar and IOLMaster for intraocular lens power calculation].
    Huang JH; Yang X; Wang QM; Cheng SM; Chen J
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Nov; 48(11):1005-10. PubMed ID: 23302275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of the repeatability of the Lenstar and comparison with two other non-contact biometric devices in myopes.
    Zhao J; Chen Z; Zhou Z; Ding L; Zhou X
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Jan; 96(1):92-9. PubMed ID: 22943766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of two optical biometers in intraocular lens power calculation.
    Hui S; Yi L
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2014 Sep; 62(9):931-4. PubMed ID: 25370395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of a new optical biometry with an optical low-coherence reflectometry for ocular biometry.
    Güler E; Kulak AE; Totan Y; Yuvarlak A; Hepşen İF
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2016 Oct; 39(5):336-41. PubMed ID: 27344235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Ocular biometry in children with hypermetropia: utility of the Lenstar LS 900 optical biometer (Haag-Streit(®))].
    Loudot C; Zanin E; Fogliarini C; Boulze M; Souchon L; Denis D
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2011 Jun; 34(6):369-75. PubMed ID: 21550131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Intraocular lens power calculation for high myopic eyes with cataract: comparison of three formulas].
    Zhu XJ; He WW; Du Y; Qian DJ; Dai JH; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Yan Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Apr; 53(4):260-265. PubMed ID: 28412798
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Agreement and clinical comparison between a new swept-source optical coherence tomography-based optical biometer and an optical low-coherence reflectometry biometer.
    Arriola-Villalobos P; Almendral-Gómez J; Garzón N; Ruiz-Medrano J; Fernández-Pérez C; Martínez-de-la-Casa JM; Díaz-Valle D
    Eye (Lond); 2017 Mar; 31(3):437-442. PubMed ID: 27834962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of the ultrasonographic method with 2 partial coherence interferometry methods for intraocular lens power calculation.
    Salouti R; Nowroozzadeh MH; Zamani M; Ghoreyshi M; Salouti R
    Optometry; 2011 Mar; 82(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 20933477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of Optical Low-Coherence Reflectometry and Swept-Source OCT-Based Biometry Devices in Dense Cataracts.
    Vasavada SA; Patel P; Vaishnav VR; Ashena Z; Srivastava S; Vasavada V; Nanavaty MA
    J Refract Surg; 2020 Aug; 36(8):557-564. PubMed ID: 32785730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biometry and intraocular lens power calculation results with a new optical biometry device: comparison with the gold standard.
    Kaswin G; Rousseau A; Mgarrech M; Barreau E; Labetoulle M
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Apr; 40(4):593-600. PubMed ID: 24680520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of Two Optical Biometers.
    Shin MC; Chung SY; Hwang HS; Han KE
    Optom Vis Sci; 2016 Mar; 93(3):259-65. PubMed ID: 26760579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of anterior segment measurements with LenStar and Pentacam in patients with newly diagnosed glaucoma.
    Sen E; Inanc M; Elgin U; Yilmazbas P
    Int Ophthalmol; 2018 Feb; 38(1):171-174. PubMed ID: 28108902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effect of anterior chamber depth on the choice of intraocular lens calculation formula in patients with normal axial length.
    Miraftab M; Hashemi H; Fotouhi A; Khabazkhoob M; Rezvan F; Asgari S
    Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol; 2014; 21(4):307-11. PubMed ID: 25371635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of refractive outcomes obtained with two swept-source OCT-based optical biometers after cataract surgery: A study of 152 eyes.
    Agard E; Levron A; Billant J; Douma I; Dot C
    J Fr Ophtalmol; 2024 Jun; 47(6):104186. PubMed ID: 38663226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 21.