These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

219 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29789351)

  • 1. Development and validation of two clinical prediction models to inform clinical decision-making for lumbar spinal fusion surgery for degenerative disorders and rehabilitation following surgery: protocol for a prospective observational study.
    Rushton AB; Verra ML; Emms A; Heneghan NR; Falla D; Reddington M; Cole AA; Willems P; Benneker L; Selvey D; Hutton M; Heymans MW; Staal JB
    BMJ Open; 2018 May; 8(5):e021078. PubMed ID: 29789351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Predictors of poor outcome following lumbar spinal fusion surgery: a prospective observational study to derive two clinical prediction rules using British Spine Registry data.
    Rushton AB; Jadhakhan F; Verra ML; Emms A; Heneghan NR; Falla D; Reddington M; Cole AA; Willems PC; Benneker L; Selvey D; Hutton M; Heymans MW; Staal JB
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Jul; 32(7):2303-2318. PubMed ID: 37237240
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Prediction model for outcome after low-back surgery: individualized likelihood of complication, hospital readmission, return to work, and 12-month improvement in functional disability.
    McGirt MJ; Sivaganesan A; Asher AL; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E13. PubMed ID: 26621411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 1. Disability, quality of life, and pain outcomes following lumbar spine surgery: predicting likely individual patient outcomes for shared decision-making.
    McGirt MJ; Bydon M; Archer KR; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Parker SL; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; Asher AL
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):357-369. PubMed ID: 28498074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patient journey following lumbar spinal fusion surgery (LSFS): protocol for a multicentre qualitative analysis of the patient rehabilitation experience (FuJourn).
    Rushton A; Staal JB; Verra M; Emms A; Reddington M; Soundy A; Cole A; Willems P; Benneker L; Masson A; Heneghan NR
    BMJ Open; 2018 Jan; 8(1):e020710. PubMed ID: 29301765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Do measures of surgical effectiveness at 1 year after lumbar spine surgery accurately predict 2-year outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Elsamadicy AA; Han JL; Cheng J; Karikari I; Bagley CA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2016 Dec; 25(6):689-696. PubMed ID: 26722957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database, Part 2. Predictive model for return to work after elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; Archer KR; Chotai S; Parker SL; Bydon M; Nian H; Harrell FE; Speroff T; Dittus RS; Philips SE; Shaffrey CI; Foley KT; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Oct; 27(4):370-381. PubMed ID: 28498069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive versus open fusion for Grade I degenerative lumbar spondylolisthesis: analysis of the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Mummaneni PV; Bisson EF; Kerezoudis P; Glassman S; Foley K; Slotkin JR; Potts E; Shaffrey M; Shaffrey CI; Coric D; Knightly J; Park P; Fu KM; Devin CJ; Chotai S; Chan AK; Virk M; Asher AL; Bydon M
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E11. PubMed ID: 28760035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A prospective, multi-institutional comparative effectiveness study of lumbar spine surgery in morbidly obese patients: does minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion result in superior outcomes?
    Adogwa O; Carr K; Thompson P; Hoang K; Darlington T; Perez E; Fatemi P; Gottfried O; Cheng J; Isaacs RE
    World Neurosurg; 2015 May; 83(5):860-6. PubMed ID: 25535070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Follow-up score, change score or percentage change score for determining clinical important outcome following surgery? An observational study from the Norwegian registry for Spine surgery evaluating patient reported outcome measures in lumbar spinal stenosis and lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis.
    Austevoll IM; Gjestad R; Grotle M; Solberg T; Brox JI; Hermansen E; Rekeland F; Indrekvam K; Storheim K; Hellum C
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2019 Jan; 20(1):31. PubMed ID: 30658613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Is the use of minimally invasive fusion technologies associated with improved outcomes after elective interbody lumbar fusion? Analysis of a nationwide prospective patient-reported outcomes registry.
    McGirt MJ; Parker SL; Mummaneni P; Knightly J; Pfortmiller D; Foley K; Asher AL
    Spine J; 2017 Jul; 17(7):922-932. PubMed ID: 28254672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Are patient-reported outcome measures biased by method of follow-up? Evaluating paper-based and digital follow-up after lumbar fusion surgery.
    Schröder ML; de Wispelaere MP; Staartjes VE
    Spine J; 2019 Jan; 19(1):65-70. PubMed ID: 29730459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.
    Werner DAT; Grotle M; Gulati S; Austevoll IM; Lønne G; Nygaard ØP; Solberg TK
    Eur Spine J; 2017 Oct; 26(10):2650-2659. PubMed ID: 28616747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Development and Validation of a Prediction Model for Pain and Functional Outcomes After Lumbar Spine Surgery.
    Khor S; Lavallee D; Cizik AM; Bellabarba C; Chapman JR; Howe CR; Lu D; Mohit AA; Oskouian RJ; Roh JR; Shonnard N; Dagal A; Flum DR
    JAMA Surg; 2018 Jul; 153(7):634-642. PubMed ID: 29516096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Two-year comprehensive medical management of degenerative lumbar spine disease (lumbar spondylolisthesis, stenosis, or disc herniation): a value analysis of cost, pain, disability, and quality of life: clinical article.
    Parker SL; Godil SS; Mendenhall SK; Zuckerman SL; Shau DN; McGirt MJ
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Aug; 21(2):143-9. PubMed ID: 24785973
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Patient characteristics of smokers undergoing lumbar spine surgery: an analysis from the Quality Outcomes Database.
    Asher AL; Devin CJ; McCutcheon B; Chotai S; Archer KR; Nian H; Harrell FE; McGirt M; Mummaneni PV; Shaffrey CI; Foley K; Glassman SD; Bydon M
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2017 Dec; 27(6):661-669. PubMed ID: 28960162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of complications within 90 days on patient-reported outcomes 3 months and 12 months following elective surgery for lumbar degenerative disease.
    Chotai S; Parker SL; Sivaganesan A; Sielatycki JA; Asher AL; McGirt MJ; Devin CJ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2015 Dec; 39(6):E8. PubMed ID: 26621422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Revisions for screw malposition and clinical outcomes after robot-guided lumbar fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Schröder ML; Staartjes VE
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 May; 42(5):E12. PubMed ID: 28463610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A protocol of a randomized controlled multicenter trial for surgical treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: the Lumbar Interbody Fusion Trial (LIFT).
    de Kunder SL; Rijkers K; van Kuijk SM; Evers SM; de Bie RA; van Santbrink H
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2016 Oct; 17(1):417. PubMed ID: 27716168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.