322 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29789877)
1. [Meta-analyses on measurement precision of non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring technologies in adults].
Pestel G; Fukui K; Higashi M; Schmidtmann I; Werner C
Anaesthesist; 2018 Jun; 67(6):409-425. PubMed ID: 29789877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cardiac output and stroke volume variation measured by the pulse wave transit time method: a comparison with an arterial pressure-based cardiac output system.
Suzuki T; Suzuki Y; Okuda J; Minoshima R; Misonoo Y; Ueda T; Kato J; Nagata H; Yamada T; Morisaki H
J Clin Monit Comput; 2019 Jun; 33(3):385-392. PubMed ID: 29948667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of stroke volume measurement between non-invasive bioreactance and esophageal Doppler in patients undergoing major abdominal-pelvic surgery.
De Pascale G; Singer M; Brealey D
J Anesth; 2017 Aug; 31(4):545-551. PubMed ID: 28391426
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. New Developments in Hemodynamic Monitoring.
Scheeren TWL; Ramsay MAE
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2019 Aug; 33 Suppl 1():S67-S72. PubMed ID: 31279355
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of three non-invasive hemodynamic monitoring methods in critically ill children.
Chaiyakulsil C; Chantra M; Katanyuwong P; Khositseth A; Anantasit N
PLoS One; 2018; 13(6):e0199203. PubMed ID: 29912937
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Non-Invasive Haemodynamic Monitoring in Pregnancy: A Comparative Study Using Ultrasound and Bioreactance.
Vinayagam D; Bowe S; Sheehan E; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Fetal Diagn Ther; 2017; 41(4):273-282. PubMed ID: 27705969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. New Developments in Continuous Hemodynamic Monitoring of the Critically Ill Patient.
Couture EJ; Laferrière-Langlois P; Denault A
Can J Cardiol; 2023 Apr; 39(4):432-443. PubMed ID: 36669685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Partial CO2 rebreathing indirect Fick technique for non-invasive measurement of cardiac output.
Haryadi DG; Orr JA; Kuck K; McJames S; Westenskow DR
J Clin Monit Comput; 2000; 16(5-6):361-74. PubMed ID: 12580219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Accuracy and precision of non-invasive cardiac output monitoring devices in perioperative medicine: a systematic review and meta-analysis†.
Joosten A; Desebbe O; Suehiro K; Murphy LS; Essiet M; Alexander B; Fischer MO; Barvais L; Van Obbergh L; Maucort-Boulch D; Cannesson M
Br J Anaesth; 2017 Mar; 118(3):298-310. PubMed ID: 28203792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Clinical application of the electric cardiometry based non-invasive ICON® hemodynamic monitor].
Zakariás D; Marics G; Kovács K; Jermendy Á; Vatai B; Schuster G; Tóth-Heyn P; Szabó J A; Lódi C
Orv Hetil; 2018 Nov; 159(44):1775-1781. PubMed ID: 30392409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Clearsight™ use for haemodynamic monitoring during the third trimester of pregnancy - a validation study.
Duclos G; Hili A; Resseguier N; Kelway C; Haddam M; Bourgoin A; Carcopino X; Zieleskiewicz L; Leone M
Int J Obstet Anesth; 2018 Nov; 36():85-95. PubMed ID: 30392653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Noninvasive continuous cardiac output monitoring in perioperative and intensive care medicine.
Saugel B; Cecconi M; Wagner JY; Reuter DA
Br J Anaesth; 2015 Apr; 114(4):562-75. PubMed ID: 25596280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Non-invasive measurements of pulse pressure variation and stroke volume variation in anesthetized patients using the Nexfin blood pressure monitor.
Stens J; Oeben J; Van Dusseldorp AA; Boer C
J Clin Monit Comput; 2016 Oct; 30(5):587-94. PubMed ID: 26318314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Multicenter study verifying a method of noninvasive continuous cardiac output measurement using pulse wave transit time: a comparison with intermittent bolus thermodilution cardiac output.
Yamada T; Tsutsui M; Sugo Y; Sato T; Akazawa T; Sato N; Yamashita K; Ishihara H; Takeda J
Anesth Analg; 2012 Jul; 115(1):82-7. PubMed ID: 22467885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multicenter study of noninvasive monitoring systems as alternatives to invasive monitoring of acutely ill emergency patients.
Shoemaker WC; Belzberg H; Wo CC; Milzman DP; Pasquale MD; Baga L; Fuss MA; Fulda GJ; Yarbrough K; Van DeWater JP; Ferraro PJ; Thangathurai D; Roffey P; Velmahos G; Murray JA; Asensio JA; ElTawil K; Dougherty WR; Sullivan MJ; Patil RS; Adibi J; James CB; Demetriades D
Chest; 1998 Dec; 114(6):1643-52. PubMed ID: 9872201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of noninvasive bioreactance with oesophageal Doppler estimation of stroke volume during open abdominal surgery: an observational study.
Conway DH; Hussain OA; Gall I
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 2013 Aug; 30(8):501-8. PubMed ID: 23549128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cardiac output assessment in pregnancy: comparison of two automated monitors with echocardiography.
Vinayagam D; Patey O; Thilaganathan B; Khalil A
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):32-38. PubMed ID: 26970353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Quantification of stroke volume in a simulated healthy volunteer model of traumatic haemorrhage; a comparison of two non-invasive monitoring devices using error grid analysis alongside traditional measures of agreement.
Hutchings SD; Watchorn J; McDonald R; Jeffreys S; Bates M; Watts S; Kirkman E
PLoS One; 2021; 16(12):e0261546. PubMed ID: 34941918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
