These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29790097)

  • 21. Dissociating spatial and spatiotemporal aspects of navigation ability in chronic stroke patients.
    Claessen MHG; Visser-Meily JMA; Jagersma E; Braspenning ME; van der Ham IJM
    Neuropsychology; 2016 Sep; 30(6):697-708. PubMed ID: 26866346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Not all anxious individuals get lost: Trait anxiety and mental rotation ability interact to explain performance in map-based route learning in men.
    Thoresen JC; Francelet R; Coltekin A; Richter KF; Fabrikant SI; Sandi C
    Neurobiol Learn Mem; 2016 Jul; 132():1-8. PubMed ID: 27108599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Changes in spatial cognition and brain activity after a single dose of testosterone in healthy women.
    Pintzka CW; Evensmoen HR; Lehn H; Håberg AK
    Behav Brain Res; 2016 Feb; 298(Pt B):78-90. PubMed ID: 26542812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. What makes a landmark effective in adolescent and adult rats? Sex and age differences in a navigation task.
    Chamizo VD; Torres MN; Rodríguez CA; Mackintosh NJ
    Learn Behav; 2019 Jun; 47(2):156-165. PubMed ID: 30349970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sex Differences in Exploration Behavior and the Relationship to Harm Avoidance.
    Gagnon KT; Cashdan EA; Stefanucci JK; Creem-Regehr SH
    Hum Nat; 2016 Mar; 27(1):82-97. PubMed ID: 26650605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Spatial cognition in mice and rats: similarities and differences in brain and behavior.
    Hok V; Poucet B; Duvelle É; Save É; Sargolini F
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2016 Nov; 7(6):406-421. PubMed ID: 27582415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Sex differences in visuospatial and navigational working memory: the role of mood induced by background music.
    Palmiero M; Nori R; Rogolino C; D'amico S; Piccardi L
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Aug; 234(8):2381-9. PubMed ID: 27052885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perirhinal cortex involvement in allocentric spatial learning in the rat: Evidence from doubly marked tasks.
    Ramos JMJ
    Hippocampus; 2017 May; 27(5):507-517. PubMed ID: 28100028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Navigation with two landmarks in rats (Rattus norvegicus): the role of landmark salience.
    Rodrigo T; Gimeno E; Ayguasanosa M; Chamizo VD
    J Comp Psychol; 2014 Nov; 128(4):378-86. PubMed ID: 24749502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals.
    Schinazi VR; Thrash T; Chebat DR
    Wiley Interdiscip Rev Cogn Sci; 2016; 7(1):37-58. PubMed ID: 26683114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Effects of Restricted Peripheral Field-of-View on Spatial Learning while Navigating.
    Barhorst-Cates EM; Rand KM; Creem-Regehr SH
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(10):e0163785. PubMed ID: 27760150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Deviating to the right: using eyetracking to study the role of attention in navigation asymmetries.
    Robertson JS; Forte JD; Nicholls ME
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2015 Apr; 77(3):830-43. PubMed ID: 25515431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Sex differences in virtual navigation influenced by scale and navigation experience.
    Padilla LM; Creem-Regehr SH; Stefanucci JK; Cashdan EA
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):582-590. PubMed ID: 27714666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Learning-dependent evolution of spatial representations in large-scale virtual environments.
    Starrett MJ; Stokes JD; Huffman DJ; Ferrer E; Ekstrom AD
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2019 Mar; 45(3):497-514. PubMed ID: 29985031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Sex differences on the competitive place task in the water maze: The influence of peripheral pool time on spatial navigation performance in rats.
    Devan BD; Tobin EL; Dunn EN; Magalis C
    Behav Processes; 2016 Nov; 132():34-41. PubMed ID: 27693532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Navigating toward a novel environment from a route or survey perspective: neural correlates and context-dependent connectivity.
    Boccia M; Guariglia C; Sabatini U; Nemmi F
    Brain Struct Funct; 2016 May; 221(4):2005-21. PubMed ID: 25739692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A Tale of Two Types of Perspective Taking: Sex Differences in Spatial Ability.
    Tarampi MR; Heydari N; Hegarty M
    Psychol Sci; 2016 Nov; 27(11):1507-1516. PubMed ID: 27658902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Familiar environments enhance object and spatial memory in both younger and older adults.
    Merriman NA; Ondřej J; Roudaia E; O'Sullivan C; Newell FN
    Exp Brain Res; 2016 Jun; 234(6):1555-74. PubMed ID: 26821318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Understanding Differences in Wayfinding Strategies.
    Hegarty M; He C; Boone AP; Yu S; Jacobs EG; Chrastil ER
    Top Cogn Sci; 2023 Jan; 15(1):102-119. PubMed ID: 34973064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Human place and response learning: navigation strategy selection, pupil size and gaze behavior.
    de Condappa O; Wiener JM
    Psychol Res; 2016 Jan; 80(1):82-93. PubMed ID: 25537525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.