BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

256 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29790121)

  • 1. When does reading dirty words impede picture processing? Taboo interference with verbal and manual responses.
    Mädebach A; Markuske AM; Jescheniak JD
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2301-2308. PubMed ID: 29790121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The locus of taboo context effects in picture naming.
    Hansen SJ; McMahon KL; Burt JS; de Zubicaray GI
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Jan; 70(1):75-91. PubMed ID: 26629985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lions, tigers, and bears, oh sh!t: Semantics versus tabooness in speech production.
    White KK; Abrams L; Koehler SM; Collins RJ
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2017 Apr; 24(2):489-495. PubMed ID: 27271052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Semantic interference in the picture-word interference task: Is there a pre-lexical, conceptual contribution to the effect?
    Jescheniak JD; Wöhner S; Bethcke HS; Beaupain MC
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):373-378. PubMed ID: 31898263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Locus of semantic interference in picture-word interference tasks.
    Damian MF; Bowers JS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2003 Mar; 10(1):111-7. PubMed ID: 12747497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Word naming slows picture naming but does not affect cumulative semantic interference.
    Vitkovitch M; Batool Ghadiri T; Hersi F
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Apr; 195():30-38. PubMed ID: 30870743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Locus of semantic interference in picture naming: Evidence from dual-task performance.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Schriefers H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2014 Jan; 40(1):147-65. PubMed ID: 23895445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Semantic interference in picture naming during dual-task performance does not vary with reading ability.
    Piai V; Roelofs A; Roete I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1758-68. PubMed ID: 25397667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Central bottleneck influences on the processing stages of word production.
    Ferreira VS; Pashler H
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Nov; 28(6):1187-99. PubMed ID: 12450341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. On the costs of parallel processing in dual-task performance: The case of lexical processing in word production.
    Paucke M; Oppermann F; Koch I; Jescheniak JD
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Dec; 41(6):1539-52. PubMed ID: 26375632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Semantic interference in a delayed naming task: evidence for the response exclusion hypothesis.
    Janssen N; Schirm W; Mahon BZ; Caramazza A
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 Jan; 34(1):249-56. PubMed ID: 18194068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Theoretical analysis of the cognitive processing of lexical and pictorial stimuli: reading, naming, and visual and conceptual comparisons.
    Theios J; Amrhein PC
    Psychol Rev; 1989 Jan; 96(1):5-24. PubMed ID: 2928419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. What does rapid automatized naming measure? A new RAN task compared to naming and lexical decision.
    Wile TL; Borowsky R
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):47-62. PubMed ID: 15172524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional resource demands of visual word recognition in naming and lexical decisions.
    Herdman CM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 May; 18(2):460-70. PubMed ID: 1593230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Developmental surface dyslexias.
    Friedmann N; Lukov L
    Cortex; 2008 Oct; 44(9):1146-60. PubMed ID: 18761129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Are precues effective in proactively controlling taboo interference during speech production?
    White KK; Abrams L; Hsi LR; Watkins EC
    Cogn Emot; 2018 Dec; 32(8):1625-1636. PubMed ID: 29411684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Task set persistence modulates word reading following resolution of picture-word interference.
    Masson ME; Bub DN; Ishigami Y
    Mem Cognit; 2007 Dec; 35(8):2012-8. PubMed ID: 18265616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tracing the time course of picture--word processing.
    Smith MC; Magee LE
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 1980 Dec; 109(4):373-92. PubMed ID: 6449530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Phonological facilitation from pictures in a word association task: evidence for routine cascaded processing in spoken word production.
    Humphreys KR; Boyd CH; Watter S
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Dec; 63(12):2289-96. PubMed ID: 20737355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. How do speakers resist distraction? Evidence from a taboo picture-word interference task.
    Dhooge E; Hartsuiker RJ
    Psychol Sci; 2011 Jul; 22(7):855-9. PubMed ID: 21642551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.