303 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29791686)
1. Extruded upper first molar intrusion: Comparison between unilateral and bilateral miniscrew anchorage.
Sugii MM; Barreto BCF; Francisco Vieira-Júnior W; Simone KRI; Bacchi A; Caldas RA
Dental Press J Orthod; 2018 Jan; 23(1):63-70. PubMed ID: 29791686
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Maxillary posterior intrusion mechanics with mini-implant anchorage evaluated with the finite element method.
Çifter M; Saraç M
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Nov; 140(5):e233-41. PubMed ID: 22051501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Mandibular canine intrusion with the segmented arch technique: A finite element method study.
Caballero GM; Carvalho Filho OA; Hargreaves BO; Brito HH; Magalhães Júnior PA; Oliveira DD
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2015 Jun; 147(6):691-7. PubMed ID: 26038072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intrusion of overerupted periodontally compromised posterior teeth using orthodontic mini implants: A mechanobiological finite element study.
Ugarte OM; Cattaneo PM; Roscoe MG; Gialain IO; Dominguez GC; Ballester RY; Meira JBC
Orthod Craniofac Res; 2023 May; 26(2):239-247. PubMed ID: 36073609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Maxillary anterior en masse retraction using different antero-posterior position of mini screw: a 3D finite element study.
Hedayati Z; Shomali M
Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 27667816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two distalization methods compared in a novel patient-specific finite element analysis.
Ammoury MJ; Mustapha S; Dechow PC; Ghafari JG
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Sep; 156(3):326-336. PubMed ID: 31474262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mandibular anterior intrusion using miniscrews for skeletal anchorage: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
González Del Castillo McGrath M; Araujo-Monsalvo VM; Murayama N; Martínez-Cruz M; Justus-Doczi R; Domínguez-Hernández VM; Ondarza-Rovira R
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2018 Oct; 154(4):469-476. PubMed ID: 30268257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intrusion of overerupted maxillary molars with miniscrew implant anchorage: a radiographic evaluation.
Xun CL; Zhao H; Zeng XL; Wang X
J Huazhong Univ Sci Technolog Med Sci; 2013 Oct; 33(5):780-785. PubMed ID: 24142737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Maxillary posterior intrusion with corticotomy-assisted approaches with zygomatic anchorage-a finite element stress analysis.
Uysal C; Baloş Tuncer B; Tuncer C
Prog Orthod; 2019 Mar; 20(1):8. PubMed ID: 30828752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effective en-masse retraction design with orthodontic mini-implant anchorage: a finite element analysis.
Sung SJ; Jang GW; Chun YS; Moon YS
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 May; 137(5):648-57. PubMed ID: 20451784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Finite element analysis of the effect of force directions on tooth movement in extraction space closure with miniscrew sliding mechanics.
Kojima Y; Kawamura J; Fukui H
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2012 Oct; 142(4):501-8. PubMed ID: 22999674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Apical force distribution due to orthodontic forces: a finite element study.
Mathur AK; Gupta V; Sarmah A; Pai VS; Chandrashekar G
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2011 Mar; 12(2):104-8. PubMed ID: 22186752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Three-dimensional dental model analysis of treatment outcomes for protrusive maxillary dentition: comparison of headgear, miniscrew, and miniplate skeletal anchorage.
Lai EH; Yao CC; Chang JZ; Chen I; Chen YJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 Nov; 134(5):636-45. PubMed ID: 18984395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of mechanical vibration on miniscrew implants and bone: Fem analysis.
Pasaoglu Bozkurt A
Int Orthod; 2019 Mar; 17(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 30770332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of tooth displacement between buccal mini-implants and palatal plate anchorage for molar distalization: a finite element study.
Yu IJ; Kook YA; Sung SJ; Lee KJ; Chun YS; Mo SS
Eur J Orthod; 2014 Aug; 36(4):394-402. PubMed ID: 22051536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Apical stress distribution on maxillary central incisor during various orthodontic tooth movements by varying cemental and two different periodontal ligament thicknesses: a FEM study.
Vikram NR; Senthil Kumar KS; Nagachandran KS; Hashir YM
Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):213-20. PubMed ID: 22945712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effects of Skeletally Supported Anterior en Masse Retraction with Varied Lever Arm Lengths and Locations in Lingual Orthodontic Treatment: A 3D Finite Element Study.
Ghannam M; Kamiloğlu B
Biomed Res Int; 2021; 2021():9975428. PubMed ID: 34056005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Construction and assessment of a three-dimensional finite element model of mandibualr second molar mesialization using customized lingual appliance and mini-implant].
Chen C; Wang CX; Yang JH; Cai LY; Rong QG; Zhang YL
Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2017 Dec; 52(12):735-739. PubMed ID: 29275567
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Molar uprighting with mini screws: comparison among different systems and relative biomechanical analysis.
Musilli M; Marsico M; Romanucci A; Grampone F
Prog Orthod; 2010; 11(2):166-73. PubMed ID: 20974454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intrusion of overerupted upper first molar using two orthodontic miniscrews. A case report.
Kravitz ND; Kusnoto B; Tsay PT; Hohlt WF
Angle Orthod; 2007 Sep; 77(5):915-22. PubMed ID: 17902236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
