These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29792373)

  • 1. Systematic spatial patterns of the sense of familiarity: Hierarchical modelling based on eye-tracking experiments.
    Miyoshi K; Ashida H
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):832-846. PubMed ID: 29792373
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The perirhinal cortex modulates V2 activity in response to the agreement between part familiarity and configuration familiarity.
    Peterson MA; Cacciamani L; Barense MD; Scalf PE
    Hippocampus; 2012 Oct; 22(10):1965-77. PubMed ID: 22987675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Familiarity and recollection produce distinct eye movement, pupil and medial temporal lobe responses when memory strength is matched.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2012 Nov; 50(13):3080-93. PubMed ID: 22902538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Word position affects stimulus recognition: evidence for early ERP short-term plastic modulation.
    Spironelli C; Galfano G; Umiltà C; Angrilli A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2011 Dec; 82(3):217-24. PubMed ID: 21924299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hippocampal contribution to implicit configuration memory expressed via eye movements during scene exploration.
    Ryals AJ; Wang JX; Polnaszek KL; Voss JL
    Hippocampus; 2015 Sep; 25(9):1028-41. PubMed ID: 25620526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Recognition memory strength is predicted by pupillary responses at encoding while fixation patterns distinguish recollection from familiarity.
    Kafkas A; Montaldi D
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2011 Oct; 64(10):1971-89. PubMed ID: 21838656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Selective familiarity deficits after left anterior temporal-lobe removal with hippocampal sparing are material specific.
    Martin CB; Bowles B; Mirsattari SM; Köhler S
    Neuropsychologia; 2011 Jun; 49(7):1870-8. PubMed ID: 21419788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The sensorimotor contributions to implicit memory, familiarity, and recollection.
    Topolinski S
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2012 May; 141(2):260-81. PubMed ID: 22004167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Gesturing during mental problem solving reduces eye movements, especially for individuals with lower visual working memory capacity.
    Pouw WT; Mavilidi MF; van Gog T; Paas F
    Cogn Process; 2016 Aug; 17(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 26993293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Eye movements and familiarity effects in visual search.
    Greene HH; Rayner K
    Vision Res; 2001 Dec; 41(27):3763-73. PubMed ID: 11712988
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Familiarity Speeds Up Visual Short-term Memory Consolidation: Electrophysiological Evidence from Contralateral Delay Activities.
    Xie W; Zhang W
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 Jan; 30(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 28891784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Impaired assessment of cumulative lifetime familiarity for object concepts after left anterior temporal-lobe resection that includes perirhinal cortex but spares the hippocampus.
    Bowles B; Duke D; Rosenbaum RS; McRae K; Köhler S
    Neuropsychologia; 2016 Sep; 90():170-9. PubMed ID: 27378441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is elapsing time really recoded into spatial linear representation in working memory?
    Ding X; Cheng X; Fan Z; Liu H
    Exp Psychol; 2015; 62(1):11-9. PubMed ID: 25270562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Working memory load and the retro-cue effect: A diffusion model account.
    Shepherdson P; Oberauer K; Souza AS
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Feb; 44(2):286-310. PubMed ID: 28557495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. List constituency and orthographic and phonological processing: a shift to high familiarity words from low familiarity words.
    Rutherford BJ
    Neuropsychologia; 2014 Dec; 65():74-81. PubMed ID: 25455570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. ERP profiles for face and word recognition are based on their status in semantic memory not their stimulus category.
    Nie A; Griffin M; Keinath A; Walsh M; Dittmann A; Reder L
    Brain Res; 2014 Apr; 1557():66-73. PubMed ID: 24530268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Distortions in the brain? ERP effects of caricaturing familiar and unfamiliar faces.
    Kaufmann JM; Schweinberger SR
    Brain Res; 2008 Sep; 1228():177-88. PubMed ID: 18634766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Eye movements and prospective memory: what the eyes can tell us about prospective memory.
    West R; Carlson L; Cohen AL
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2007 Jun; 64(3):269-77. PubMed ID: 17112615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Multivariate fMRI and Eye Tracking Reveal Differential Effects of Visual Interference on Recognition Memory Judgments for Objects and Scenes.
    O'Neil EB; Watson HC; Dhillon S; Lobaugh NJ; Lee AC
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Sep; 27(9):1708-22. PubMed ID: 25848685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Complementary roles of medial temporal lobes and mid-dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for working memory for novel and familiar trial-unique visual stimuli.
    Schon K; Ross RS; Hasselmo ME; Stern CE
    Eur J Neurosci; 2013 Feb; 37(4):668-78. PubMed ID: 23167976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.