These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

235 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29792501)

  • 1. Optimizing the length, width, and balance of a personality scale: How do internal characteristics affect external validity?
    Soto CJ; John OP
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Apr; 31(4):444-459. PubMed ID: 29792501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power.
    Soto CJ; John OP
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):117-143. PubMed ID: 27055049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Validation of a French translation of Krueger's personality inventory for DSM-5 in its brief form (PID-5 BF)].
    Combaluzier S; Gouvernet B; Menant F; Rezrazi A
    Encephale; 2018 Feb; 44(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 27692349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Does the French Big Five Inventory evaluate facets other than the Big Five factors?].
    Courtois R; Petot JM; Lignier B; Lecocq G; Plaisant O
    Encephale; 2018 Jun; 44(3):208-214. PubMed ID: 28364967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparing the validity of trait estimates from the multidimensional forced-choice format and the rating scale format.
    Wetzel E; Frick S
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Mar; 32(3):239-253. PubMed ID: 31738070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires.
    Thalmayer AG; Saucier G; Eigenhuis A
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):995-1009. PubMed ID: 21859221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Development and validation of Big Four personality scales for the Schedule for Nonadaptive and Adaptive Personality--Second Edition (SNAP-2).
    Calabrese WR; Rudick MM; Simms LJ; Clark LA
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Sep; 24(3):751-63. PubMed ID: 22250598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. "The next Big Five Inventory (BFI-2): Developing and assessing a hierarchical model with 15 facets to enhance bandwidth, fidelity, and predictive power": Correction to Soto and John (2016).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Jul; 113(1):143. PubMed ID: 28617026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Construct validity of adolescents' self-reported big five personality traits: importance of conceptual breadth and initial validation of a short measure.
    Morizot J
    Assessment; 2014 Oct; 21(5):580-606. PubMed ID: 24619971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Initial development of pathological personality trait domain measures using the Personality Assessment Inventory (PAI).
    Ruiz MA; Hopwood CJ; Edens JF; Morey LC; Cox J
    Personal Disord; 2018 Nov; 9(6):564-573. PubMed ID: 29939046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Are reflective models appropriate for very short scales? Proofs of concept of formative models using the Ten-Item Personality Inventory.
    Myszkowski N; Storme M; Tavani JL
    J Pers; 2019 Apr; 87(2):363-372. PubMed ID: 29704236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effect of personality item writing on psychometric properties of ideal-point and likert scales.
    Huang J; Mead AD
    Psychol Assess; 2014 Dec; 26(4):1162-72. PubMed ID: 24999752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Is personality assessment with the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr) invariant according to gender and activity of the respondents?].
    Lignier B; Lheureux F
    Encephale; 2022 Feb; 48(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 33892921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Method biases in single-source personality assessments.
    McCrae RR
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Sep; 30(9):1160-1173. PubMed ID: 29595291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The impact of acquiescence on the evaluation of personality structure.
    Rammstedt B; Farmer RF
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Dec; 25(4):1137-45. PubMed ID: 23815112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The Personality Inventory for ICD-11: Investigating reliability, structural and concurrent validity, and method variance.
    Carnovale M; Sellbom M; Bagby RM
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Jan; 32(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 31556679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Big Five Inventory-2: Replication of Psychometric Properties in a Dutch Adaptation and First Evidence for the Discriminant Predictive Validity of the Facet Scales [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text] [Formula: see text].
    Denissen JJA; Geenen R; Soto CJ; John OP; van Aken MAG
    J Pers Assess; 2020; 102(3):309-324. PubMed ID: 30638406
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Does the number of response options matter? Psychometric perspectives using personality questionnaire data.
    Simms LJ; Zelazny K; Williams TF; Bernstein L
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Apr; 31(4):557-566. PubMed ID: 30869956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The Multidimensional Personality Questionnaire's inconsistency scales identify invalid profiles through internal statistics and external correlates.
    Benning SD; Freeman AJ
    Psychol Assess; 2017 Dec; 29(12):1531-1536. PubMed ID: 28263643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and construct validity of the Personality Inventory for ICD-11 (PiCD) in Italian adult participants.
    Somma A; Gialdi G; Fossati A
    Psychol Assess; 2020 Jan; 32(1):29-39. PubMed ID: 31414851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.