These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

258 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29793795)

  • 21. Restorative material and loading type influence on the biomechanical behavior of wedge shaped cervical lesions.
    Pereira FA; Zeola LF; de Almeida Milito G; Reis BR; Pereira RD; Soares PV
    Clin Oral Investig; 2016 Apr; 20(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26159778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Fluid flow after resin-composite restoration in extracted carious teeth.
    Banomyong D; Palamara JE; Messer HH; Burrow MF
    Eur J Oral Sci; 2009 Jun; 117(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 19583764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated molars restored with extensive composite resin restorations.
    Plotino G; Buono L; Grande NM; Lamorgese V; Somma F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Mar; 99(3):225-32. PubMed ID: 18319094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. In vitro fracture resistance of molar teeth restored with a short fibre-reinforced composite material.
    Fráter M; Forster A; Keresztúri M; Braunitzer G; Nagy K
    J Dent; 2014 Sep; 42(9):1143-50. PubMed ID: 24859462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The effect of different restoration techniques on the fracture resistance of endodontically-treated molars.
    Cobankara FK; Unlu N; Cetin AR; Ozkan HB
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(5):526-33. PubMed ID: 18833859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Comparison of premolar cuspal deflection in bulk or in incremental composite restoration methods.
    Kim ME; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2011; 36(3):326-34. PubMed ID: 21827222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effect of bulk/incremental fill on internal gap formation of bulk-fill composites.
    Furness A; Tadros MY; Looney SW; Rueggeberg FA
    J Dent; 2014 Apr; 42(4):439-49. PubMed ID: 24480086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of Internal Adaptation in Class II Bulk-fill Composite Restorations Using Micro-CT.
    Han SH; Park SH
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(2):203-214. PubMed ID: 27892836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. In Vitro Evaluation of Marginal Adaptation of Direct Class II Composite Restorations Made of Different "Low-Shrinkage" Systems.
    Shahidi C; Krejci I; Dietschi D
    Oper Dent; 2017; 42(3):273-283. PubMed ID: 28467259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Randomized clinical trial of adhesive restorations in primary molars. 18-month results.
    Casagrande L; Dalpian DM; Ardenghi TM; Zanatta FB; Balbinot CE; García-Godoy F; De Araujo FB
    Am J Dent; 2013 Dec; 26(6):351-5. PubMed ID: 24640441
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Composite resin support of undermined enamel in amalgam restorations.
    Eidelman E
    Pediatr Dent; 1999; 21(2):118-20. PubMed ID: 10197337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A two-year comparison of resin-based composite tunnel and Class II restorations in a randomized controlled trial.
    Kinomoto Y; Inoue Y; Ebisu S
    Am J Dent; 2004 Aug; 17(4):253-6. PubMed ID: 15478486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Marginal Gap Formation in Approximal "Bulk Fill" Resin Composite Restorations After Artificial Ageing.
    Peutzfeldt A; Mühlebach S; Lussi A; Flury S
    Oper Dent; 2018; 43(2):180-189. PubMed ID: 29148914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. In vitro Comparative Evaluation of Various Restorative Materials used for restoring Class III Cavities in Deciduous Anterior Teeth: A Clinical Study.
    Priyank H; Verma A; Gupta K; Chaudhary E; Khandelwal D; Nihalani S
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Dec; 17(12):1022-1026. PubMed ID: 27965491
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the cervical integrity during occlusal loading of Class II restorations.
    Campos PE; Barceleiro Mde O; Sampaio-Filho HR; Martins LR
    Oper Dent; 2008; 33(1):59-64. PubMed ID: 18335734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A 15-year randomized controlled study of a reduced shrinkage stress resin composite.
    van Dijken JW; Lindberg A
    Dent Mater; 2015 Sep; 31(9):1150-8. PubMed ID: 26205382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomized controlled clinical trial of the 24-months survival of composite resin restorations after one-step incomplete and complete excavation on primary teeth.
    Franzon R; Opdam NJ; Guimarães LF; Demarco FF; Casagrande L; Haas AN; Araujo FB
    J Dent; 2015 Oct; 43(10):1235-41. PubMed ID: 26231301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Nine-year evaluation of a polyacid-modified resin composite/resin composite open sandwich technique in Class II cavities.
    Lindberg A; van Dijken JW; Lindberg M
    J Dent; 2007 Feb; 35(2):124-9. PubMed ID: 16956709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Influence of restorative technique on the biomechanical behavior of endodontically treated maxillary premolars. Part II: strain measurement and stress distribution.
    Soares PV; Santos-Filho PC; Gomide HA; Araujo CA; Martins LR; Soares CJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Feb; 99(2):114-22. PubMed ID: 18262012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparison of photopolymerization temperature increases in internal and external positions of composite and tooth cavities in real time: Incremental fillings of microhybrid composite vs. bulk filling of bulk fill composite.
    Kim RJ; Son SA; Hwang JY; Lee IB; Seo DG
    J Dent; 2015 Sep; 43(9):1093-1098. PubMed ID: 26159386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.