These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

459 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29793866)

  • 21. Teen Drivers' Perceptions of Inattention and Cell Phone Use While Driving.
    McDonald CC; Sommers MS
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16 Suppl 2(0):S52-8. PubMed ID: 26436243
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Variability in decision-making and critical cue use by different road users at rail level crossings.
    Beanland V; Lenné MG; Salmon PM; Stanton NA
    Ergonomics; 2016 Jun; 59(6):754-66. PubMed ID: 26394762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Difference in rural and urban driver-injury severities in highway-rail grade crossing accidents.
    Hao W; Kamga C
    Int J Inj Contr Saf Promot; 2017 Jun; 24(2):174-182. PubMed ID: 26394024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Validation of a Driving Simulator Study on Driver Behavior at Passive Rail Level Crossings.
    Larue GS; Wullems C; Sheldrake M; Rakotonirainy A
    Hum Factors; 2018 Sep; 60(6):743-754. PubMed ID: 30016120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Are child occupants a significant source of driving distraction?
    Koppel S; Charlton J; Kopinathan C; Taranto D
    Accid Anal Prev; 2011 May; 43(3):1236-44. PubMed ID: 21376923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Smartwatches are more distracting than mobile phones while driving: Results from an experimental study.
    Brodeur M; Ruer P; Léger PM; Sénécal S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2021 Jan; 149():105846. PubMed ID: 33181456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Microsimulation modelling of driver behaviour towards alternative warning devices at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Zhu S; Ferreira L; Wallis G
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Oct; 71():177-82. PubMed ID: 24929822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of age and gender on motor vehicle driver injury severity at highway-rail grade crossings in the United States.
    Hao W; Kamga C; Daniel J
    J Safety Res; 2015 Dec; 55():105-13. PubMed ID: 26683553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A rear-end collision risk assessment model based on drivers' collision avoidance process under influences of cell phone use and gender-A driving simulator based study.
    Li X; Yan X; Wu J; Radwan E; Zhang Y
    Accid Anal Prev; 2016 Dec; 97():1-18. PubMed ID: 27565040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Using naturalistic driving study data to investigate the impact of driver distraction on driver's brake reaction time in freeway rear-end events in car-following situation.
    Gao J; Davis GA
    J Safety Res; 2017 Dec; 63():195-204. PubMed ID: 29203019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Impact of distraction on the driving performance of adolescents with and without attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder.
    Narad M; Garner AA; Brassell AA; Saxby D; Antonini TN; O'Brien KM; Tamm L; Matthews G; Epstein JN
    JAMA Pediatr; 2013 Oct; 167(10):933-8. PubMed ID: 23939758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. "Slow down. Rail crossing ahead. Look left and right at the crossing": In-vehicle auditory alerts improve driver behavior at rail crossings.
    Nadri C; Kekal S; Li Y; Li X; Lee SC; Nelson D; Lautala P; Jeon M
    Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103912. PubMed ID: 36179543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Real-world effects of using a phone while driving on lateral and longitudinal control of vehicles.
    Dozza M; Flannagan CA; Sayer JR
    J Safety Res; 2015 Dec; 55():81-7. PubMed ID: 26683550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The influence of drinking, texting, and eating on simulated driving performance.
    Irwin C; Monement S; Desbrow B
    Traffic Inj Prev; 2015; 16(2):116-23. PubMed ID: 24828121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Texting while driving: is speech-based text entry less risky than handheld text entry?
    He J; Chaparro A; Nguyen B; Burge RJ; Crandall J; Chaparro B; Ni R; Cao S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Nov; 72():287-95. PubMed ID: 25089769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Mobile Phone Use in a Car-Following Situation: Impact on Time Headway and Effectiveness of Driver's Rear-End Risk Compensation Behavior via a Driving Simulator Study.
    Chen Y; Fu R; Xu Q; Yuan W
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Feb; 17(4):. PubMed ID: 32092914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Modelling driver behaviour towards innovative warning devices at railway level crossings.
    Tey LS; Wallis G; Cloete S; Ferreira L
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Mar; 51():104-11. PubMed ID: 23207839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A parametric duration model of the reaction times of drivers distracted by mobile phone conversations.
    Haque MM; Washington S
    Accid Anal Prev; 2014 Jan; 62():42-53. PubMed ID: 24129320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Driver distraction in an unusual environment: Effects of text-messaging in tunnels.
    Rudin-Brown CM; Young KL; Patten C; Lenné MG; Ceci R
    Accid Anal Prev; 2013 Jan; 50():122-9. PubMed ID: 23200448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Using European naturalistic driving data to assess secondary task engagement when stopped at a red light.
    Morgenstern T; Petzoldt T; Krems JF; Naujoks F; Keinath A
    J Safety Res; 2020 Jun; 73():235-243. PubMed ID: 32563398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 23.