These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2979394)

  • 1. [Importance of legal medicine from the viewpoint of the attorney].
    Baatz G
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986; 36(2):4-9. PubMed ID: 2979394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [The institutes of legal medicine and missions of criminal expertise: practice and centralization of autopsies; supplementary research. The viewpoint of the magistrate].
    Lassaque H
    Med Leg Dommage Corpor; 1973; 6(1):52-8. PubMed ID: 4800649
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [The physician as the expert in civil legal suits].
    Weimar W
    Ther Ggw; 1981 Aug; 120(8):748-52. PubMed ID: 7292360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The training of specialists in legal medicine].
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1981; 31():5-89. PubMed ID: 7052288
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Legal problems concerned with forensic stomatological expert testimony].
    Svadkovskiĭ BS
    Stomatologiia (Mosk); 1972; 51(1):58-61. PubMed ID: 4500926
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Observations on the adversary system and the role of the forensic scientist: "scientific truth" v. "legal truth".
    Pollack S
    J Forensic Sci; 1973 Jul; 18(3):173-7. PubMed ID: 4782656
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Legal and forensic importance of determining the degree of alcoholism lege artis].
    Pandurović S; Jokanović D
    Med Glas; 1972 Feb; 26(2):51-6. PubMed ID: 5083183
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Expertise in corporeal injury and the training of medical experts. The viewpoint of the magistrate].
    Macherez C
    Med Leg Dommage Corpor; 1973; 6(1):70-2. PubMed ID: 4800654
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [The value of serological expert testimony from the legal viewpoint].
    Koffka E
    Beitr Gerichtl Med; 1969; 25():97-104. PubMed ID: 5821402
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Medico-legal investigations and traffic accidents].
    Dalgaard JB
    Nord Med; 1972 Jun; 87(6):169-72. PubMed ID: 5040043
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Medico-legal problems of epilepsy].
    Sila A
    Neuropsihijatrija; 1970; 18(2):227-35. PubMed ID: 5524003
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Legal science versus science in law.
    Aldisert RJ
    J Forensic Sci; 1972 Jul; 17(3):345-8. PubMed ID: 4669581
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Jurisprudence issues in forensic odontology.
    Bowers CM
    Dent Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 45(2):399-415, ix. PubMed ID: 11370461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Letter: Physician's civil-law liability when acting as a forensic medicine expert in cases of erroneous testimony].
    Jessnitzer K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1974 Mar; 99(11):542. PubMed ID: 4835520
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Expert testimony and testifier in legal medicine].
    NICOLETTI F
    Minerva Medicoleg; 1956; 76(4):45-8. PubMed ID: 13387344
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The phantom expert: unconsented use of an expert's name and/or testimony, as a legal strategy.
    Gutheil TG; Simon RI; Hilliard JT
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2001; 29(3):313-8. PubMed ID: 11592459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [From court medicine to forensic medicine].
    Bär W
    Ther Umsch; 1997 May; 54(5):215-6. PubMed ID: 9244989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Rejection of a forensic expert because of a private opinion given by him earlier].
    Jessnitzer K
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 1973 Nov; 98(48):2315-6. PubMed ID: 4762832
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A defense viewpoint on jury selection in medical malpractice cases.
    Trager L
    Med Trial Tech Q; 1981; 27(4):399-411. PubMed ID: 7253849
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Opinions and testimony of expert witnesses and independent medical evaluators.
    Schofferman J
    Pain Med; 2007; 8(4):376-82. PubMed ID: 17610460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.