These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2979460)

  • 1. [Towards an objective methodology in psychopathology: contribution of new diagnostic systems of psychometrics and biological psychiatry].
    Ansseau M; Franck G
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):151-67. PubMed ID: 2979460
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Recent psychiatric classification systems and their significance for forensic psychiatry].
    Hoff P
    Gesundheitswesen; 1992 May; 54(5):244-50. PubMed ID: 1623309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The use of psychiatric diagnoses in the legal process: task force report of the American Psychiatric Association.
    Halleck SL; Hoge SK; Miller RD; Sadoff RL; Halleck NH
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1992; 20(4):481-99. PubMed ID: 1482801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [Quantification in psychiatry: from psychometrics to quantitative psychiatry].
    Pichot P
    Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1994; 94(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 7502648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Diagnostic validity and psychiatric expert testimony.
    Rogers T
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2004; 27(3):281-90. PubMed ID: 15177995
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Development of modern classification systems and their effects on forensic psychiatric expert assessment].
    Krupinski M
    Gesundheitswesen; 1994 Dec; 56(12):652-6. PubMed ID: 7841673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Problem of a test method assessment of simulation and dissimulation in forensic expert testimony].
    Szegedi M
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1986; 36(2):298-300. PubMed ID: 2979386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Recommendations for the implementation and creation of forensic psychiatric expert testimony].
    Szewczyk H
    Psychiatr Neurol Med Psychol (Leipz); 1981 Nov; 33(11):689-94. PubMed ID: 7330122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Probable diagnosis and alternative opinions].
    Fleszar-Szumigajowa J
    Psychiatr Pol; 1972; 6(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 5012381
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Ethical problems in forensic-psychiatric assessment].
    Barbey I
    Psychiatr Prax; 1988 Sep; 15(5):176-81. PubMed ID: 3054984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Opinion of the Polish Psychiatric Association Management Office and Polish consultants about the use of forensic psychiatry in expert court testimony].
    Bomba J; Wciórka J; Puzyński S
    Psychiatr Pol; 2004; 38(2):198-200. PubMed ID: 15307285
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The expert witness as a teacher.
    Tanay E
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1980; 8(4):401-11. PubMed ID: 7284618
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Standardised rating scales in psychiatry: methodological basis, their possibilities and limitations and descriptions of important rating scales.
    Möller HJ
    World J Biol Psychiatry; 2009; 10(1):6-26. PubMed ID: 18663668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Editorial: Complexity and future of biochemical differential diagnosis in psychiatry.
    Schreiber G; Avissar S
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2004; 41(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 15478452
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Contribution of the AMDP scale to quantitative psychopathology].
    Bobon D
    Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1985; 85(1):5-249. PubMed ID: 3887843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Characteristics of forensic-psychiatric expert testimony concerning pathologic and simple alcoholic intoxication].
    Morozov GV; Kachaev AK; Lukachev GIa
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1974; 17(2):51-4. PubMed ID: 4840084
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Substance-related mental disorders and expert testimony].
    Okada T; Ando K
    Ryoikibetsu Shokogun Shirizu; 2003; (40):538-41. PubMed ID: 14626179
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [History, description and application of the AMDP system and its derivative systems (AGP, FPDS)].
    Bobon D
    Acta Psychiatr Belg; 1987; 87(1):7-22. PubMed ID: 3604724
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Testimony of the psychiatric expert from the viewpoint of the criminal judge].
    Schmitt B
    Arch Kriminol; 1996; 198(1-2):38-54. PubMed ID: 8967830
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Psychopathology of interaction as the criterion for expert examination of maladjusted behavior].
    Pirozynski T; Scripcaru G; Pirozynski M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 1979; 83(4):565-8. PubMed ID: 550243
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.