These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2979461)

  • 21. [Forensic psychiatric expertise in 1962-1987].
    Terbancea M; Predescu V; Dragomirescu V; Prelipceanu D; Stănescu F
    Rev Med Interna Neurol Psihiatr Neurochir Dermatovenerol Neurol Psihiatr Neurochir; 1988; 33(2):125-34. PubMed ID: 2973107
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. [Restriction of rendering an expert psychiatric opinion by legal maneuvers].
    Cabanis D
    Munch Med Wochenschr; 1969 Oct; 111(43):2234-7. PubMed ID: 5395245
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Legal criteria of irresponsibility in forensic psychiatric expert evaluation].
    Turova ZG; Tatarinova EA
    Vrach Delo; 1987 Dec; (12):77-8. PubMed ID: 3445575
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Competency to waive Miranda rights: clinical and legal issues.
    Frumkin IB
    Ment Phys Disabil Law Rep; 2000; 24(2):326-31. PubMed ID: 10870355
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. [Forensic psychiatric expertise. A methodology letter].
    Rev Med Interna Neurol Psihiatr Neurochir Dermatovenerol Neurol Psihiatr Neurochir; 1988; 33(2):153-9. PubMed ID: 2973108
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Mental capacity related to responsibility. A medico-legal interdisciplinary relational model].
    Dragomirescu VT
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 2979464
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Commentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases.
    Edersheim JG; Beck JC
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 16394229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law.
    Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H;
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Qualifying the psychiatrist as a lay witness: a reaction to the American Psychiatric Association petition in Barefoot v. Estelle.
    Bennett GT; Sullwold AF
    J Forensic Sci; 1985 Apr; 30(2):462-6. PubMed ID: 3998695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [Significance of the study of slow cerebral potentials in the psychiatric expert testimony in civil law cases].
    Timsit-Berthier M; Timsit M
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 2979479
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Justice and psychiatry: the role of the expert].
    Lernout P
    Soins Psychiatr; 2000; (209):4-5. PubMed ID: 11288350
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. [Reactive behavior with medico-legal implications. Interdisciplinary causal interpretation].
    Dragomirescu VT; Popa V
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 2979473
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Criminal responsibility: a review of the literature since 1981.
    Niveau G; McQuillan A
    Health Law Can; 2000 May; 20(4):58-66. PubMed ID: 11357758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. [State and perspectives of scientific studies with regard to medico-legal expert testimony in traffic injuries].
    Solokhin AA
    Sud Med Ekspert; 1984; 27(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 6464076
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Conducting forensic examinations on the road: are you practicing your profession without a license?
    Simon RI; Shuman DW
    J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 10212028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. [Qualification of persons taking part in psychiatric opinion-giving in a penal trial].
    Zgryzek K
    Psychiatr Pol; 1998; 32(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 9816897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Beyond the scientific limits of expert testimony.
    Wasyliw OE; Cavanaugh JL; Rogers R
    Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 4041625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Penal judiciary expertise. Harmonization of psychiatric and psychologic procedures].
    Schweitzer MG
    Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 2979475
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Placement and treatment of mentally ill offenders--basic concepts and service provision in European Union Member States].
    Salize HJ; Dressing H
    Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Nov; 34(8):388-94. PubMed ID: 17546532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court.
    Gutheil TG
    Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.