These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
26. [Mental capacity related to responsibility. A medico-legal interdisciplinary relational model]. Dragomirescu VT Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):183-9. PubMed ID: 2979464 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
27. Commentary: expert testimony as a potential asset in defense of capital sentencing cases. Edersheim JG; Beck JC J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2005; 33(4):519-22. PubMed ID: 16394229 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. AAPL practice guideline for forensic psychiatric evaluation of defendants raising the insanity defense. American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law. Giorgi-Guarnieri D; Janofsky J; Keram E; Lawsky S; Merideth P; Mossman D; Schwart-Watts D; Scott C; Thompson J; Zonana H; J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2002; 30(2 Suppl):S3-40. PubMed ID: 12099305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Qualifying the psychiatrist as a lay witness: a reaction to the American Psychiatric Association petition in Barefoot v. Estelle. Bennett GT; Sullwold AF J Forensic Sci; 1985 Apr; 30(2):462-6. PubMed ID: 3998695 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. [Significance of the study of slow cerebral potentials in the psychiatric expert testimony in civil law cases]. Timsit-Berthier M; Timsit M Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):291-306. PubMed ID: 2979479 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. [Justice and psychiatry: the role of the expert]. Lernout P Soins Psychiatr; 2000; (209):4-5. PubMed ID: 11288350 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
32. [Reactive behavior with medico-legal implications. Interdisciplinary causal interpretation]. Dragomirescu VT; Popa V Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):243-7. PubMed ID: 2979473 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
33. Criminal responsibility: a review of the literature since 1981. Niveau G; McQuillan A Health Law Can; 2000 May; 20(4):58-66. PubMed ID: 11357758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. [State and perspectives of scientific studies with regard to medico-legal expert testimony in traffic injuries]. Solokhin AA Sud Med Ekspert; 1984; 27(2):18-22. PubMed ID: 6464076 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
35. Conducting forensic examinations on the road: are you practicing your profession without a license? Simon RI; Shuman DW J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1999; 27(1):75-82. PubMed ID: 10212028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Qualification of persons taking part in psychiatric opinion-giving in a penal trial]. Zgryzek K Psychiatr Pol; 1998; 32(4):397-403. PubMed ID: 9816897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Beyond the scientific limits of expert testimony. Wasyliw OE; Cavanaugh JL; Rogers R Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 1985; 13(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 4041625 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
38. [Penal judiciary expertise. Harmonization of psychiatric and psychologic procedures]. Schweitzer MG Acta Med Leg Soc (Liege); 1988; 38(2):263-9. PubMed ID: 2979475 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. [Placement and treatment of mentally ill offenders--basic concepts and service provision in European Union Member States]. Salize HJ; Dressing H Psychiatr Prax; 2007 Nov; 34(8):388-94. PubMed ID: 17546532 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. The presentation of forensic psychiatric evidence in court. Gutheil TG Isr J Psychiatry Relat Sci; 2000; 37(2):137-44. PubMed ID: 10994298 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]