517 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29794640)
1. Prospective Evaluation of Obese Patients Undergoing Autologous Abdominal Free Flap Breast Reconstruction.
Chang EI; Liu J
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Aug; 142(2):120e-125e. PubMed ID: 29794640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of Obesity on Postoperative Complications After Breast Reconstruction Using Free Muscle-Sparing Transverse Rectus Abdominis Myocutaneous, Deep Inferior Epigastric Perforator, and Superficial Inferior Epigastric Artery Flap: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Lee KT; Mun GH
Ann Plast Surg; 2016 May; 76(5):576-84. PubMed ID: 25536199
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Inclusion of mesh in donor-site repair of free TRAM and muscle-sparing free TRAM flaps yields rates of abdominal complications comparable to those of DIEP flap reconstruction.
Wan DC; Tseng CY; Anderson-Dam J; Dalio AL; Crisera CA; Festekjian JH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2010 Aug; 126(2):367-374. PubMed ID: 20679822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Risk factors for abdominal donor-site morbidity in free flap breast reconstruction.
Vyas RM; Dickinson BP; Fastekjian JH; Watson JP; DaLio AL; Crisera CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 May; 121(5):1519-1526. PubMed ID: 18453973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of obesity on flap and donor-site complications in free transverse rectus abdominis myocutaneous flap breast reconstruction.
Chang DW; Wang B; Robb GL; Reece GP; Miller MJ; Evans GR; Langstein HN; Kroll SS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2000 Apr; 105(5):1640-8. PubMed ID: 10809092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Breast reconstruction with superficial inferior epigastric artery flaps: a prospective comparison with TRAM and DIEP flaps.
Chevray PM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2004 Oct; 114(5):1077-83; discussion 1084-5. PubMed ID: 15457015
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comprehensive analysis of donor-site morbidity in abdominally based free flap breast reconstruction.
Chang EI; Chang EI; Soto-Miranda MA; Zhang H; Nosrati N; Robb GL; Chang DW
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Dec; 132(6):1383-1391. PubMed ID: 24005365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Breast Reconstruction with the free TRAM or DIEP flap: patient selection, choice of flap, and outcome.
Nahabedian MY; Momen B; Galdino G; Manson PN
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 Aug; 110(2):466-75; discussion 476-7. PubMed ID: 12142662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Outcomes of delayed abdominal-based autologous reconstruction versus latissimus dorsi flap plus implant reconstruction in previously irradiated patients.
Levine SM; Patel N; Disa JJ
Ann Plast Surg; 2012 Oct; 69(4):380-2. PubMed ID: 22964681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dual-Pedicle Flap for Unilateral Autologous Breast Reconstruction Revisited: Evolution and Optimization of Flap Design over 15 Years.
Chang EI; Kronowitz SJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 May; 137(5):1372-1380. PubMed ID: 27119911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Breast reconstruction with the DIEP flap or the muscle-sparing (MS-2) free TRAM flap: is there a difference?
Nahabedian MY; Tsangaris T; Momen B
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):436-44; discussion 445-6. PubMed ID: 15692347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Effects of radiation therapy for breast cancer based on type of free flap reconstruction.
Chang EI; Liu TS; Festekjian JH; Da Lio AL; Crisera CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2013 Jan; 131(1):1e-8e. PubMed ID: 23271550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. DIEP and pedicled TRAM flaps: a comparison of outcomes.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Casey WJ; Gray RJ; Hernández JL; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2006 May; 117(6):1711-9; discussion 1720-1. PubMed ID: 16651940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Muscle-sparing TRAM flap does not protect breast reconstruction from postmastectomy radiation damage compared with the DIEP flap.
Garvey PB; Clemens MW; Hoy AE; Smith B; Zhang H; Kronowitz SJ; Butler CE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2014 Feb; 133(2):223-233. PubMed ID: 24469158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Complications and Patient-Reported Outcomes after Abdominally Based Breast Reconstruction: Results of the Mastectomy Reconstruction Outcomes Consortium Study.
Erdmann-Sager J; Wilkins EG; Pusic AL; Qi J; Hamill JB; Kim HM; Guldbrandsen GE; Chun YS
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2018 Feb; 141(2):271-281. PubMed ID: 29019862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A head-to-head comparison between the muscle-sparing free TRAM and the SIEA flaps: is the rate of flap loss worth the gain in abdominal wall function?
Selber JC; Samra F; Bristol M; Sonnad SS; Vega S; Wu L; Serletti JM
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Aug; 122(2):348-355. PubMed ID: 18626349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The deep inferior epigastric perforator flap for breast reconstruction in overweight and obese patients.
Garvey PB; Buchel EW; Pockaj BA; Gray RJ; Samson TD
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2005 Feb; 115(2):447-57. PubMed ID: 15692349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Morbidity of microsurgical breast reconstruction in patients with comorbid conditions.
Seidenstuecker K; Munder B; Mahajan AL; Richrath P; Behrendt P; Andree C
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2011 Mar; 127(3):1086-1092. PubMed ID: 21364411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Deep inferior epigastric perforator flap in breast reconstruction: experience with the first 50 flaps.
Hamdi M; Weiler-Mithoff EM; Webster MH
Plast Reconstr Surg; 1999 Jan; 103(1):86-95. PubMed ID: 9915167
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Quality of Life and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Multicenter Comparison of Four Abdominally Based Autologous Reconstruction Methods.
Macadam SA; Zhong T; Weichman K; Papsdorf M; Lennox PA; Hazen A; Matros E; Disa J; Mehrara B; Pusic AL
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2016 Mar; 137(3):758-771. PubMed ID: 26910656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
