249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795826)
1. Relationships Among Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory Frameworks via Factor Analytic Models.
Kohli N; Koran J; Henn L
Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):389-405. PubMed ID: 29795826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Methodological issues regarding power of classical test theory (CTT) and item response theory (IRT)-based approaches for the comparison of patient-reported outcomes in two groups of patients--a simulation study.
Sébille V; Hardouin JB; Le Néel T; Kubis G; Boyer F; Guillemin F; Falissard B
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2010 Mar; 10():24. PubMed ID: 20338031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A primer on classical test theory and item response theory for assessments in medical education.
De Champlain AF
Med Educ; 2010 Jan; 44(1):109-17. PubMed ID: 20078762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does Scoring Method Impact Estimation of Significant Individual Changes Assessed by Patient-Reported Outcome Measures? Comparing Classical Test Theory Versus Item Response Theory.
Tang X; Schalet BD; Peipert JD; Cella D
Value Health; 2023 Oct; 26(10):1518-1524. PubMed ID: 37315768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evaluating Equating Transformations in IRT Observed-Score and Kernel Equating Methods.
Leôncio W; Wiberg M; Battauz M
Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Mar; 47(2):123-140. PubMed ID: 36875292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Classical Test Theory and Item Response Theory in Individual Change Assessment.
Jabrayilov R; Emons WHM; Sijtsma K
Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Nov; 40(8):559-572. PubMed ID: 29881070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. What's in a score: A longitudinal investigation of scores based on item response theory and classical test theory for the Amsterdam Instrumental Activities of Daily Living Questionnaire in cognitively normal and impaired older adults.
Dubbelman MA; Postema MC; Jutten RJ; Harrison JE; Ritchie CW; Aleman A; de Jong FJ; Schalet BD; Terwee CB; van der Flier WM; Scheltens P; Sikkes SAM
Neuropsychology; 2024 Jan; 38(1):96-105. PubMed ID: 37676135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Approximate Functional Relationship between IRT and CTT Item Discrimination Indices: A Simulation, Validation, and Practical Extension of Lord's (1980) Formula.
Kulas JT; Smith JA; Xu H
J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(4):393-407. PubMed ID: 29252208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Using classical test theory, item response theory, and Rasch measurement theory to evaluate patient-reported outcome measures: a comparison of worked examples.
Petrillo J; Cano SJ; McLeod LD; Coon CD
Value Health; 2015 Jan; 18(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 25595231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. State of the psychometric methods: comments on the ISOQOL SIG psychometric papers.
Bjorner JB
J Patient Rep Outcomes; 2019 Jul; 3(1):49. PubMed ID: 31359221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of the Biostatistics and Clinical Epidemiology Skills (BACES) assessment for medical residents.
Barlow PB; Skolits G; Heidel RE; Metheny W; Smith TL
Postgrad Med J; 2015 Aug; 91(1078):423-30. PubMed ID: 26253921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The relationship between classical item characteristics and item response time on computer-based testing.
Chae YM; Park SG; Park I
Korean J Med Educ; 2019 Mar; 31(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 30852856
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measure for measure: new developments in measurement and item response theory.
Streiner DL
Can J Psychiatry; 2010 Mar; 55(3):180-6. PubMed ID: 20370969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Item response theory in high-stakes pharmacy assessments.
Wolcott MD; Olsen AA; Augustine JM
Curr Pharm Teach Learn; 2022 Sep; 14(9):1206-1214. PubMed ID: 36154966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Some links between classical and modern test theory via the two-level hierarchical generalized linear model.
Miyazaki Y
J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(3):289-310. PubMed ID: 15942072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Latent variables should remain as such: Evidence from a Monte Carlo study.
Rdz-Navarro K
J Gen Psychol; 2019; 146(4):417-442. PubMed ID: 31008695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An Item Response Theory (IRT) analysis of the Short Inventory of Problems-Alcohol and Drugs (SIP-AD) among non-treatment seeking men-who-have-sex-with-men: evidence for a shortened 10-item SIP-AD.
Hagman BT; Kuerbis AN; Morgenstern J; Bux DA; Parsons JT; Heidinger BE
Addict Behav; 2009 Nov; 34(11):948-54. PubMed ID: 19564078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Latent growth modeling of IRT versus CTT measured longitudinal latent variables.
Gorter R; Fox JP; Riet GT; Heymans MW; Twisk J
Stat Methods Med Res; 2020 Apr; 29(4):962-986. PubMed ID: 31271111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A general Bayesian multilevel multidimensional IRT model for locally dependent data.
Fujimoto KA
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2018 Nov; 71(3):536-560. PubMed ID: 29882212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Measurement in Couple and Family Therapy: An Item Response Theory Primer.
Anderson SR; Miller RB
J Marital Fam Ther; 2020 Oct; 46(4):603-619. PubMed ID: 32776620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
