These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795830)

  • 1. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Tu D; Wang S; Cai Y; Douglas J; Chang HH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):255-271. PubMed ID: 31156279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.
    Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bradshaw L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):220-240. PubMed ID: 29795911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY; Brusco MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):268-91. PubMed ID: 25496248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Cai Y; Tu D; Ding S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1413. PubMed ID: 30135672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Growth Modeling in a Diagnostic Classification Model (DCM) Framework-A Multivariate Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Pan Q; Qin L; Kingston N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1714. PubMed ID: 32903674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing Growth in a Diagnostic Classification Model Framework.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Psychometrika; 2018 Dec; 83(4):963-990. PubMed ID: 30264183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Q-Matrix Designs of Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Models With Hierarchical Attributes for Formative Assessment.
    Tian W; Zhang J; Peng Q; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1694. PubMed ID: 32903650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Adaptive Design for Item Parameter Online Estimation and Q-Matrix Online Calibration in CD-CAT.
    Wang W; Tu Y; Song L; Zheng J; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():710497. PubMed ID: 34504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Using the iterative latent-class analysis approach to improve attribute accuracy in diagnostic classification models.
    Jiang Z
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Jun; 51(3):1075-1084. PubMed ID: 30843156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Bayesian Estimation of the DINA Q matrix.
    Chen Y; Culpepper SA; Chen Y; Douglas J
    Psychometrika; 2018 Mar; 83(1):89-108. PubMed ID: 28861685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Semi-supervised Learning Method for Q-Matrix Specification Under the DINA and DINO Model With Independent Structure.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Wang T; Gao P; Xiong J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2120. PubMed ID: 33013538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Performance of Fit Indices in Choosing Correct Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Q-Matrices.
    Lei PW; Li H
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):405-417. PubMed ID: 29881062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Limited-information goodness-of-fit testing of diagnostic classification item response models.
    Hansen M; Cai L; Monroe S; Li Z
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):225-252. PubMed ID: 27404336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A General Method of Empirical Q-matrix Validation.
    de la Torre J; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2016 Jun; 81(2):253-73. PubMed ID: 25943366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Explanatory Cognitive Diagnostic Models: Incorporating Latent and Observed Predictors.
    Park YS; Xing K; Lee YS
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2018 Jul; 42(5):376-392. PubMed ID: 30034055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Statistical Analysis of
    Chen Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015; 110(510):850-866. PubMed ID: 26294801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.