These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795830)

  • 21. Statistical Analysis of
    Chen Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    J Am Stat Assoc; 2015; 110(510):850-866. PubMed ID: 26294801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A Procedure for Assessing the Completeness of the Q-Matrices of Cognitively Diagnostic Tests.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY
    Psychometrika; 2017 Mar; 82(1):112-132. PubMed ID: 27714544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improving Robustness in Q-Matrix Validation Using an Iterative and Dynamic Procedure.
    Nájera P; Sorrel MA; de la Torre J; Abad FJ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Sep; 44(6):431-446. PubMed ID: 32788815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.
    Templin J; Bradshaw L
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):317-39. PubMed ID: 24478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Incorporating the Q-Matrix Into Multidimensional Item Response Theory Models.
    da Silva MA; Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bazán JL
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2019 Aug; 79(4):665-687. PubMed ID: 32655178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Q-Matrix Optimization Based on the Linear Logistic Test Model.
    Ma L; Green KE
    J Appl Meas; 2017; 18(3):247-267. PubMed ID: 29579738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The DINA model as a constrained general diagnostic model: Two variants of a model equivalency.
    von Davier M
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2014 Feb; 67(1):49-71. PubMed ID: 23297749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Hypothesis Testing of the Q-matrix.
    Gu Y; Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    Psychometrika; 2018 Jul; ():. PubMed ID: 29998451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Research on the Cognitive Diagnosis of Chinese Listening Comprehension Ability Based on the G-DINA Model.
    Li L; An Y; Ren J; Wei X
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():714568. PubMed ID: 34557134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Reducing the Misclassification Costs of Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing: Item Selection With Minimum Expected Risk.
    Hsu CL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):185-199. PubMed ID: 35528270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Misspecification of Attribute Structure in Diagnostic Measurement.
    Liu R
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Aug; 78(4):605-634. PubMed ID: 30147119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Theory of the Self-learning
    Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    Bernoulli (Andover); 2013 Nov; 19(5A):1790-1817. PubMed ID: 24812537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Examining Parameter Invariance in a General Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Ravand H; Baghaei P; Doebler P
    Front Psychol; 2019; 10():2930. PubMed ID: 31998189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Don't worry about the anchor-item setting in longitudinal learning diagnostic assessments.
    Yu X; Zhan P; Chen Q
    Front Psychol; 2023; 14():1112463. PubMed ID: 36844356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Cognitive diagnostic assessment with different weight for attribute: based on the Dina model.
    Guo L; Bao Y; Wang Z; Bian Y
    Psychol Rep; 2014 Jun; 114(3):802-22. PubMed ID: 25074303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Combining CAT with cognitive diagnosis: a weighted item selection approach.
    Wang C; Chang HH; Douglas J
    Behav Res Methods; 2012 Mar; 44(1):95-109. PubMed ID: 21853408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A sequential cognitive diagnosis model for polytomous responses.
    Ma W; de la Torre J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2016 Nov; 69(3):253-275. PubMed ID: 27317397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Sample Size Requirements for Applying Diagnostic Classification Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():621251. PubMed ID: 33569029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.