These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

153 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795841)

  • 1. Reducing Bias and Error in the Correlation Coefficient Due to Nonnormality.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Oct; 75(5):785-804. PubMed ID: 29795841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Psychol Methods; 2012 Sep; 17(3):399-417. PubMed ID: 22563845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Confidence intervals for correlations when data are not normal.
    Bishara AJ; Hittner JB
    Behav Res Methods; 2017 Feb; 49(1):294-309. PubMed ID: 26822671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A Monte Carlo investigation of the Fisher Z transformation for normal and nonnormal distributions.
    Berry KJ; Mielke PW
    Psychol Rep; 2000 Dec; 87(3 Pt 2):1101-14. PubMed ID: 11272750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlation corrected for range restriction: a simulation study.
    Chan W; Chan DW
    Psychol Methods; 2004 Sep; 9(3):369-85. PubMed ID: 15355154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The influence of nonnormality from primary studies on the standardized mean difference in meta-analysis.
    Sun RW; Cheung SF
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Aug; 52(4):1552-1567. PubMed ID: 31898292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of nonnormality on full information maximum-likelihood estimation for structural equation models with missing data.
    Enders CK
    Psychol Methods; 2001 Dec; 6(4):352-70. PubMed ID: 11778677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparing the Pearson and Spearman correlation coefficients across distributions and sample sizes: A tutorial using simulations and empirical data.
    de Winter JC; Gosling SD; Potter J
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):273-90. PubMed ID: 27213982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An Investigation of the Sample Performance of Two Nonnormality Corrections for RMSEA.
    Brosseau-Liard PE; Savalei V; Li L
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2012 Nov; 47(6):904-30. PubMed ID: 26735008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of Compounded Nonnormality of Residuals in Hierarchical Linear Modeling.
    Man K; Schumacker R; Morell M; Wang Y
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):330-355. PubMed ID: 35185162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Interval estimation for rank correlation coefficients based on the probit transformation with extension to measurement error correction of correlated ranked data.
    Rosner B; Glynn RJ
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(3):633-46. PubMed ID: 16596580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effect of normality and outliers on bivariate correlation coefficients in psychology: A Monte Carlo simulation.
    Ventura-León J; Peña-Calero BN; Burga-León A
    J Gen Psychol; 2023; 150(4):405-422. PubMed ID: 35792742
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Growth Mixture Modeling With Nonnormal Distributions: Implications for Data Transformation.
    Nam Y; Hong S
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Aug; 81(4):698-727. PubMed ID: 34267397
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The number needed to treat (NNT) can be adjusted for bias when the outcome is measured with error.
    Marschner IC; Emberson J; Irwig L; Walter SD
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1244-52. PubMed ID: 15617950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bootstrap standard error and confidence intervals for the correlations corrected for indirect range restriction.
    Li JC; Chan W; Cui Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2011 Nov; 64(3):367-87. PubMed ID: 21973092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Residual Normality Assumption and the Estimation of Multiple Membership Random Effects Models.
    Chen J; Leroux AJ
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(6):898-913. PubMed ID: 30521398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Simulating Univariate and Multivariate Nonnormal Distributions through the Method of Percentiles.
    Koran J; Headrick TC; Kuo TC
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2015; 50(2):216-32. PubMed ID: 26609879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of Box-Cox transformation on power of Haseman-Elston and maximum-likelihood variance components tests to detect quantitative trait Loci.
    Etzel CJ; Shete S; Beasley TM; Fernandez JR; Allison DB; Amos CI
    Hum Hered; 2003; 55(2-3):108-16. PubMed ID: 12931049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How accurate is the Pearson r-from-Z approximation? A Monte Carlo simulation study.
    Hittner JB; May K
    J Gen Psychol; 2012; 139(2):68-77. PubMed ID: 24836910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Performance of Methods to Test Upper-Level Mediation in the Presence of Nonnormal Data.
    Pituch KA; Stapleton LM
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2008; 43(2):237-67. PubMed ID: 26765662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.