These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795850)

  • 21. Composition of the panel of reference for concordance tests: do teaching functions have an impact on examinees' ranks and absolute scores?
    Charlin B; Gagnon R; Sauvé E; Coletti M
    Med Teach; 2007 Feb; 29(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 17538834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The second time around: accounting for retest effects on oral examinations.
    Raymond MR; Luciw-Dubas UA
    Eval Health Prof; 2010 Sep; 33(3):386-403. PubMed ID: 20801978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparability of decisions for computer adaptive and written examinations.
    Lunz ME; Bergstrom BA
    J Allied Health; 1991; 20(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 2045351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluating construct equivalence and criterion-related validity for repeat examinees on a standardized patient examination.
    Raymond MR; Kahraman N; Swygert KA; Balog KP
    Acad Med; 2011 Oct; 86(10):1253-9. PubMed ID: 21869669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Validity of Graduate Record Examinations (GRE) general test scores for admissions to colleges of veterinary medicine.
    Powers DE
    J Appl Psychol; 2004 Apr; 89(2):208-19. PubMed ID: 15065970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Pre-admission factors and utilization of tutoring services in health professions educational programs.
    Olivares-Urueta M; Williamson JW
    J Allied Health; 2013; 42(2):74-8. PubMed ID: 23752233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Brief review of fluid reasoning: Conceptualization, neurobasis, and applications.
    Otero TM
    Appl Neuropsychol Child; 2017; 6(3):204-211. PubMed ID: 28489412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Prediction of true test scores from observed item scores and ancillary data.
    Haberman SJ; Yao L; Sinharay S
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):363-85. PubMed ID: 25773314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. MCAT Verbal Reasoning score: less predictive of medical school performance for English language learners.
    Winegarden B; Glaser D; Schwartz A; Kelly C
    Med Educ; 2012 Sep; 46(9):878-86. PubMed ID: 22891908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Assessment of visual-motor coordination in 6- to 11-yr.-olds.
    Demsky Y; Carone DA; Burns WJ; Sellers A
    Percept Mot Skills; 2000 Aug; 91(1):311-21. PubMed ID: 11011902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Critical values for evaluating CELF-R Receptive and Expressive Language Score discrepancies.
    Powell TW
    Percept Mot Skills; 1993 Apr; 76(2):367-70. PubMed ID: 8483640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The validity and comparability of entrance examination scores after accommodations are made for students with LD.
    Zurcher R; Bryant DP
    J Learn Disabil; 2001; 34(5):462-71. PubMed ID: 15503594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Review courses for the American Board of Surgery certifying examination do not provide an advantage.
    Jones AT; Biester TW; Lewis FR; Malangoni MA
    Surgery; 2015 Oct; 158(4):890-6; discussion 896-8. PubMed ID: 26173685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The Undergraduate Medical and Health Sciences Admissions Test: what is it measuring?
    Griffin B; Carless S; Wilson I
    Med Teach; 2013 Sep; 35(9):727-30. PubMed ID: 23795956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Measurement precision for repeat examinees on a standardized patient examination.
    Raymond MR; Swygert KA; Kahraman N
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2012 Aug; 17(3):325-37. PubMed ID: 21964951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Using automatic item generation to create multiple-choice test items.
    Gierl MJ; Lai H; Turner SR
    Med Educ; 2012 Aug; 46(8):757-65. PubMed ID: 22803753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Benefit of a Switch: Answer-Changing on Multiple-Choice Exams by First-Year Dental Students.
    Pagni SE; Bak AG; Eisen SE; Murphy JL; Finkelman MD; Kugel G
    J Dent Educ; 2017 Jan; 81(1):110-115. PubMed ID: 28049684
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Collaborative philosophical enquiry for school children: cognitive effects at 10-12 years.
    Topping KJ; Trickey S
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2007 Jun; 77(Pt 2):271-88. PubMed ID: 17504547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. An Investigation Into the Impact of Test Session Disruptions for At-Home Test Administrations.
    Castellano KE; Sinharay S; Hao J; Li C
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2023 Jan; 47(1):76-82. PubMed ID: 36425287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.