134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795867)
1. A Simulation Study on Methods of Correcting for the Effects of Extreme Response Style.
Wetzel E; Böhnke JR; Rose N
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Apr; 76(2):304-324. PubMed ID: 29795867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Measurement and control of bias in patient reported outcomes using multidimensional item response theory.
Dowling NM; Bolt DM; Deng S; Li C
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 May; 16():63. PubMed ID: 27229310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Correcting for Extreme Response Style: Model Choice Matters.
Schoenmakers M; Tijmstra J; Vermunt J; Bolsinova M
Educ Psychol Meas; 2024 Feb; 84(1):145-170. PubMed ID: 38250509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mixture Random-Effect IRT Models for Controlling Extreme Response Style on Rating Scales.
Huang HY
Front Psychol; 2016; 7():1706. PubMed ID: 27853444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Stability of Extreme Response Style and Acquiescence Over 8 Years.
Wetzel E; Lüdtke O; Zettler I; Böhnke JR
Assessment; 2016 Jun; 23(3):279-91. PubMed ID: 25986062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Extreme Response Style and the Measurement of Intra-Individual Variability in Affect.
Deng S; E McCarthy D; E Piper M; B Baker T; Bolt DM
Multivariate Behav Res; 2018; 53(2):199-218. PubMed ID: 29324049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A Comparison of Limited-Information Test Statistics for a Response Style MIRT Model.
Starr J; Falk CF; Monroe SL; Vachon DD
Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(4):687-702. PubMed ID: 33103932
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity of Three IRT Models for Measuring and Controlling Extreme and Midpoint Response Styles.
Zhang Y; Wang Y
Front Psychol; 2020; 11():271. PubMed ID: 32153477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. THE IMPACT OF FALLIBLE ITEM PARAMETER ESTIMATES ON LATENT TRAIT RECOVERY.
Cheng Y; Yuan KH
Psychometrika; 2010 Jun; 75(2):280-291. PubMed ID: 21076651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring Response Style Stability Across Constructs With Item Response Trees.
Ames AJ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2022 Apr; 82(2):281-306. PubMed ID: 35185160
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Explaining Variability in Response Style Traits: A Covariate-Adjusted IRTree.
Ames AJ; Myers AJ
Educ Psychol Meas; 2021 Aug; 81(4):756-780. PubMed ID: 34267399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Extreme Response Style: A Simulation Study Comparison of Three Multidimensional Item Response Models.
Leventhal BC
Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):322-335. PubMed ID: 31156283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Establishing the HLS-Q12 short version of the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire: latent trait analyses applying Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Finbråten HS; Wilde-Larsson B; Nordström G; Pettersen KS; Trollvik A; Guttersrud Ø
BMC Health Serv Res; 2018 Jun; 18(1):506. PubMed ID: 29954382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MIMIC approach to assessing differential item functioning with control of extreme response style.
Jin KY; Chen HF
Behav Res Methods; 2020 Feb; 52(1):23-35. PubMed ID: 30706348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Rasch Model Parameter Estimation in the Presence of a Nonnormal Latent Trait Using a Nonparametric Bayesian Approach.
Finch H; Edwards JM
Educ Psychol Meas; 2016 Aug; 76(4):662-684. PubMed ID: 29795882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intra-individual variation of extreme response style in mixed-mode panel studies.
Aichholzer J
Soc Sci Res; 2013 May; 42(3):957-70. PubMed ID: 23522006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accounting for standard errors of vision-specific latent trait in regression models.
Wong WL; Li X; Li J; Wong TY; Cheng CY; Lamoureux EL
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jul; 55(9):5848-54. PubMed ID: 25015350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Response style analysis with threshold and multi-process IRT models: A review and tutorial.
Böckenholt U; Meiser T
Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2017 Feb; 70(1):159-181. PubMed ID: 28130934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Item-Level Analysis of a Newly Developed Interactive Nutrition Specific Physical Exam Competency Tool (INSPECT) Using the Rasch Measurement Model.
Zechariah S; Waller JL; Stallings J; Gess AJ; Lehman L
Healthcare (Basel); 2022 Jan; 10(2):. PubMed ID: 35206874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Validating the European Health Literacy Survey Questionnaire in people with type 2 diabetes: Latent trait analyses applying multidimensional Rasch modelling and confirmatory factor analysis.
Finbråten HS; Pettersen KS; Wilde-Larsson B; Nordström G; Trollvik A; Guttersrud Ø
J Adv Nurs; 2017 Nov; 73(11):2730-2744. PubMed ID: 28543754
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
