These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795907)

  • 1. Psychometric Consequences of Subpopulation Item Parameter Drift.
    Huggins-Manley AC
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Jan; 77(1):143-164. PubMed ID: 29795907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Investigating the Impact of Item Parameter Drift for Item Response Theory Models with Mixture Distributions.
    Park YS; Lee YS; Xing K
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():255. PubMed ID: 26941699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Consequences of Ignoring Guessing Effects on Measurement Invariance Analysis.
    Cuhadar I; Yang Y; Paek I
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Jun; 45(4):283-296. PubMed ID: 34177001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Investigating Measurement Invariance in Computer-Based Personality Testing: The Impact of Using Anchor Items on Effect Size Indices.
    Egberink IJL; Meijer RR; Tendeiro JN
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):126-145. PubMed ID: 29795815
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [Is personality assessment with the French Big Five Inventory (BFI-Fr) invariant according to gender and activity of the respondents?].
    Lignier B; Lheureux F
    Encephale; 2022 Feb; 48(1):52-59. PubMed ID: 33892921
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Improving the assessment of measurement invariance: Using regularization to select anchor items and identify differential item functioning.
    Belzak WCM; Bauer DJ
    Psychol Methods; 2020 Dec; 25(6):673-690. PubMed ID: 31916799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rasch fit statistics as a test of the invariance of item parameter estimates.
    Smith RM; Suh KK
    J Appl Meas; 2003; 4(2):153-63. PubMed ID: 12748407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Partial Measurement Invariance: Extending and Evaluating the Cluster Approach for Identifying Anchor Items.
    Pohl S; Schulze D; Stets E
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):477-493. PubMed ID: 34866708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Solving the measurement invariance anchor item problem in item response theory.
    Meade AW; Wright NA
    J Appl Psychol; 2012 Sep; 97(5):1016-31. PubMed ID: 22468848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Anchor Selection Strategies for DIF Analysis: Review, Assessment, and New Approaches.
    Kopf J; Zeileis A; Strobl C
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Feb; 75(1):22-56. PubMed ID: 29795811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Modern psychometric methods for detection of differential item functioning: application to cognitive assessment measures.
    Teresi JA; Kleinman M; Ocepek-Welikson K
    Stat Med; 2000 Jun 15-30; 19(11-12):1651-83. PubMed ID: 10844726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Review of the Effects on IRT Item Parameter Estimates with a Focus on Misbehaving Common Items in Test Equating.
    Michaelides MP
    Front Psychol; 2010; 1():167. PubMed ID: 21833230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation on types of invariance in studying extreme response bias with an IRTree approach.
    Jeon M; De Boeck P
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2019 Nov; 72(3):517-537. PubMed ID: 31292952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Expected linking error resulting from item parameter drift among the common Items on Rasch calibrated tests.
    Miller GE; Gesn PR; Rotou J
    J Appl Meas; 2005; 6(1):48-56. PubMed ID: 15701943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Consequences of screening in cervical cancer: development and dimensionality of a questionnaire.
    Brodersen J; Siersma V; Thorsen H
    BMC Psychol; 2018 Aug; 6(1):39. PubMed ID: 30097013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. An essay on measurement and factorial invariance.
    Meredith W; Teresi JA
    Med Care; 2006 Nov; 44(11 Suppl 3):S69-77. PubMed ID: 17060838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Differential item and test functioning methodology indicated that item response bias was not a substantial cause of country differences in mental well-being.
    Forero CG; Adroher ND; Stewart-Brown S; Castellví P; Codony M; Vilagut G; Mompart A; Tresseres R; Colom J; Castro JI; Alonso J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2014 Dec; 67(12):1364-74. PubMed ID: 25150627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance.
    Buchholz J; Hartig J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 31019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Global measurement of intimate partner violence to monitor Sustainable Development Goal 5.
    Yount KM; Cheong YF; Khan Z; Bergenfeld I; Kaslow N; Clark CJ
    BMC Public Health; 2022 Mar; 22(1):465. PubMed ID: 35260134
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Item parameter drift in computerized adaptive testing: Study with eCAT].
    Abad FJ; Olea J; Aguado D; Ponsoda V; Barrada JR
    Psicothema; 2010 May; 22(2):340-7. PubMed ID: 20423641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.