These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795911)

  • 1. The Impact of Q-Matrix Designs on Diagnostic Classification Accuracy in the Presence of Attribute Hierarchies.
    Liu R; Huggins-Manley AC; Bradshaw L
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2017 Apr; 77(2):220-240. PubMed ID: 29795911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cognitive Diagnostic Models With Attribute Hierarchies: Model Estimation With a Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Tu D; Wang S; Cai Y; Douglas J; Chang HH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):255-271. PubMed ID: 31156279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The Effects of Q-Matrix Design on Classification Accuracy in the Log-Linear Cognitive Diagnosis Model.
    Madison MJ; Bradshaw LP
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2015 Jun; 75(3):491-511. PubMed ID: 29795830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Theorems and Methods of a Complete Q Matrix With Attribute Hierarchies Under Restricted Q-Matrix Design.
    Cai Y; Tu D; Ding S
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1413. PubMed ID: 30135672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Q-Matrix Designs of Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Models With Hierarchical Attributes for Formative Assessment.
    Tian W; Zhang J; Peng Q; Yang X
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1694. PubMed ID: 32903650
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Hierarchical diagnostic classification models: a family of models for estimating and testing attribute hierarchies.
    Templin J; Bradshaw L
    Psychometrika; 2014 Apr; 79(2):317-39. PubMed ID: 24478021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A Semi-supervised Learning Method for Q-Matrix Specification Under the DINA and DINO Model With Independent Structure.
    Wang W; Song L; Ding S; Wang T; Gao P; Xiong J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2120. PubMed ID: 33013538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The accuracy and consistency of mastery for each content domain using the Rasch and deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate diagnostic classification models: a simulation study and a real-world analysis using data from the Korean Medical Licensing Examination.
    Seo DG; Kim JK
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2021; 18():15. PubMed ID: 34225413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Complete Q-matrices in conjunctive models on general attribute structures.
    Heller J
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):522-549. PubMed ID: 35307821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Scalable Bayesian Approach for the Dina Q-Matrix Estimation Combining Stochastic Optimization and Variational Inference.
    Oka M; Okada K
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):302-331. PubMed ID: 36097246
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. An Adaptive Design for Item Parameter Online Estimation and Q-Matrix Online Calibration in CD-CAT.
    Wang W; Tu Y; Song L; Zheng J; Wang T
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():710497. PubMed ID: 34504460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessing Students' Translation Competence: Integrating China's Standards of English With Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Approaches.
    Mei H; Chen H
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():872025. PubMed ID: 35432110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Misspecification of Attribute Structure in Diagnostic Measurement.
    Liu R
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Aug; 78(4):605-634. PubMed ID: 30147119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Heuristic cognitive diagnosis when the Q-matrix is unknown.
    Köhn HF; Chiu CY; Brusco MJ
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2015 May; 68(2):268-91. PubMed ID: 25496248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying the
    Chen F; Liu Y; Xin T; Cui Y
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1875. PubMed ID: 30356781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Data-driven Q-matrix validation using a residual-based statistic in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Yu X; Cheng Y
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2020 Nov; 73 Suppl 1():145-179. PubMed ID: 31762007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. International Comparative Study on PISA Mathematics Achievement Test Based on Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Wu X; Wu R; Chang HH; Kong Q; Zhang Y
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():2230. PubMed ID: 33013581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Determining the Number of Attributes in Cognitive Diagnosis Modeling.
    Nájera P; Abad FJ; Sorrel MA
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():614470. PubMed ID: 33658962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Data-driven Q-matrix learning based on Boolean matrix factorization in cognitive diagnostic assessment.
    Xiong J; Luo Z; Luo G; Yu X
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2022 Nov; 75(3):638-667. PubMed ID: 35578396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Learning Latent and Hierarchical Structures in Cognitive Diagnosis Models.
    Ma C; Ouyang J; Xu G
    Psychometrika; 2023 Mar; 88(1):175-207. PubMed ID: 35596101
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.