These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

133 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795911)

  • 21. Estimation approaches in cognitive diagnosis modeling when attributes are hierarchically structured.
    Akbay L; de la Torre J
    Psicothema; 2020 Feb; 32(1):122-129. PubMed ID: 31954425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Examining the Impact of Differential Item Functioning on Classification Accuracy in Cognitive Diagnostic Models.
    Paulsen J; Svetina D; Feng Y; Valdivia M
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 44(4):267-281. PubMed ID: 32536729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Performance of Fit Indices in Choosing Correct Cognitive Diagnostic Models and Q-Matrices.
    Lei PW; Li H
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2016 Sep; 40(6):405-417. PubMed ID: 29881062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Extending exploratory diagnostic classification models: Inferring the effect of covariates.
    Yigit HD; Culpepper SA
    Br J Math Stat Psychol; 2023 May; 76(2):372-401. PubMed ID: 36601975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. An Empirical Q-Matrix Validation Method for the Polytomous G-DINA Model.
    de la Torre J; Qiu XL; Santos KC
    Psychometrika; 2022 Jun; 87(2):693-724. PubMed ID: 34843060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validating a Reading Assessment Within the Cognitive Diagnostic Assessment Framework: Q-Matrix Construction and Model Comparisons for Different Primary Grades.
    Li Y; Zhen M; Liu J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():786612. PubMed ID: 34975681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A Sequential Higher Order Latent Structural Model for Hierarchical Attributes in Cognitive Diagnostic Assessments.
    Zhan P; Ma W; Jiao H; Ding S
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jan; 44(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 31853159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Multi-Label Classification in Anime Illustrations Based on Hierarchical Attribute Relationships.
    Lan Z; Maeda K; Ogawa T; Haseyama M
    Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(10):. PubMed ID: 37430712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. How to Use Cognitively Diagnostic Assessments of Student Performance as a Method for Monitoring and Managing the Instructional Quality in Undergraduate Medical Education.
    Bangeranye C; Lim YS
    Acad Med; 2020 Jan; 95(1):145-150. PubMed ID: 31425191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Development and validation of the Intervention Skills Profile-Skills: A brief measure of student social-emotional and academic enabling skills.
    Kilgus SP; Bonifay WE; Eklund K; von der Embse NP; Peet C; Izumi J; Shim H; Meyer LN
    J Sch Psychol; 2020 Dec; 83():66-88. PubMed ID: 33276856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Growth Modeling in a Diagnostic Classification Model (DCM) Framework-A Multivariate Longitudinal Diagnostic Classification Model.
    Pan Q; Qin L; Kingston N
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():1714. PubMed ID: 32903674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. On the Sequential Hierarchical Cognitive Diagnostic Model.
    Zhang X; Wang J
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():579018. PubMed ID: 33117245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A Semi-supervised Learning-Based Diagnostic Classification Method Using Artificial Neural Networks.
    Xue K; Bradshaw LP
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():618336. PubMed ID: 33551928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Measuring students' learning progressions in energy using cognitive diagnostic models.
    Zhou S; Traynor A
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():892884. PubMed ID: 36017436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Theory of the Self-learning
    Liu J; Xu G; Ying Z
    Bernoulli (Andover); 2013 Nov; 19(5A):1790-1817. PubMed ID: 24812537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reducing the Misclassification Costs of Cognitive Diagnosis Computerized Adaptive Testing: Item Selection With Minimum Expected Risk.
    Hsu CL; Wang WC
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2022 May; 46(3):185-199. PubMed ID: 35528270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Development of a Multidimensional Diagnostic Assessment With Learning Tools to Improve 3-D Mental Rotation Skills.
    Wang S; Hu Y; Wang Q; Wu B; Shen Y; Carr M
    Front Psychol; 2020; 11():305. PubMed ID: 32174870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Estimation of item parameters and examinees' mastery probability in each domain of the Korean medical licensing examination using deterministic inputs, noisy and gate(DINA) model.
    Choi Y; Seo DG
    J Educ Eval Health Prof; 2020; 17():35. PubMed ID: 33197992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A New Method to Balance Measurement Accuracy and Attribute Coverage in Cognitive Diagnostic Computerized Adaptive Testing.
    Sun X; Andersson B; Xin T
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2021 Oct; 45(7-8):463-476. PubMed ID: 34866707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.