These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

136 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29795956)

  • 1. The Impact of Model Parameterization and Estimation Methods on Tests of Measurement Invariance With Ordered Polytomous Data.
    Koziol NA; Bovaird JA
    Educ Psychol Meas; 2018 Apr; 78(2):272-296. PubMed ID: 29795956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Confirmatory factor analysis with ordinal data: Comparing robust maximum likelihood and diagonally weighted least squares.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2016 Sep; 48(3):936-49. PubMed ID: 26174714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Does strict invariance matter? Valid group mean comparisons with ordered-categorical items.
    Tse WW; Lai MHC; Zhang Y
    Behav Res Methods; 2024 Apr; 56(4):3117-3139. PubMed ID: 38030923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Statistical estimation of structural equation models with a mixture of continuous and categorical observed variables.
    Li CH
    Behav Res Methods; 2021 Oct; 53(5):2191-2213. PubMed ID: 33791955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Fit Indices for Measurement Invariance Tests in the Thurstonian IRT Model.
    Lee H; Smith WZ
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2020 Jun; 44(4):282-295. PubMed ID: 32536730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Testing Measurement Invariance with Ordinal Missing Data: A Comparison of Estimators and Missing Data Techniques.
    Chen PY; Wu W; Garnier-Villarreal M; Kite BA; Jia F
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2020; 55(1):87-101. PubMed ID: 31099262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing Attitudes Across Groups: An IRT-Based Item-Fit Statistic for the Analysis of Measurement Invariance.
    Buchholz J; Hartig J
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 May; 43(3):241-250. PubMed ID: 31019359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.
    Crider K; Williams J; Qi YP; Gutman J; Yeung L; Mai C; Finkelstain J; Mehta S; Pons-Duran C; Menéndez C; Moraleda C; Rogers L; Daniels K; Green P
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2022 Feb; 2(2022):. PubMed ID: 36321557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of ignoring clustered data structure in confirmatory factor analysis of ordered polytomous items: a simulation study based on PANSS.
    Stochl J; Jones PB; Perez J; Khandaker GM; Böhnke JR; Croudace TJ
    Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2016 Sep; 25(3):205-19. PubMed ID: 26096674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Type I error rates and power of several versions of scaled chi-square difference tests in investigations of measurement invariance.
    Brace JC; Savalei V
    Psychol Methods; 2017 Sep; 22(3):467-485. PubMed ID: 27893215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Measurement Invariance Conventions and Reporting: The State of the Art and Future Directions for Psychological Research.
    Putnick DL; Bornstein MH
    Dev Rev; 2016 Sep; 41():71-90. PubMed ID: 27942093
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Overfactoring in rating scale data: A comparison between factor analysis and item response theory.
    Revuelta J; Ximénez C; Minaya N
    Front Psychol; 2022; 13():982137. PubMed ID: 36533017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Testing Measurement and Factor Structure Invariance of the Physical Activity and Leisure Motivation Scale for Youth Across Gender.
    Kueh YC; Abdullah N; Kuan G; Morris T; Naing NN
    Front Psychol; 2018; 9():1096. PubMed ID: 30018580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of error structure misspecification when testing measurement invariance and latent-factor mean difference using MIMIC and multiple-group confirmatory factor analysis.
    Joo SH; Kim ES
    Behav Res Methods; 2019 Dec; 51(6):2688-2699. PubMed ID: 30242617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Measurement invariance via multigroup SEM: Issues and solutions with chi-square-difference tests.
    Yuan KH; Chan W
    Psychol Methods; 2016 Sep; 21(3):405-26. PubMed ID: 27266799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Scale length does matter: Recommendations for measurement invariance testing with categorical factor analysis and item response theory approaches.
    D'Urso ED; De Roover K; Vermunt JK; Tijmstra J
    Behav Res Methods; 2022 Oct; 54(5):2114-2145. PubMed ID: 34910286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Structural Validation and Measurement Invariance Testing of the Chinese Version of the eHealth Literacy Scale Among Undergraduates: Cross-Sectional Study.
    Long C; Zheng L; Liu R; Duan Z
    J Med Internet Res; 2023 Dec; 25():e48838. PubMed ID: 37990370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Addressing missing data in specification search in measurement invariance testing with Likert-type scale variables: A comparison of two approaches.
    Chen PY; Wu W; Brandt H; Jia F
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2567-2587. PubMed ID: 32495029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Item-Weighted Likelihood Method for Measuring Growth in Longitudinal Study With Tests Composed of Both Dichotomous and Polytomous Items.
    Xue X; Lu J; Zhang J
    Front Psychol; 2021; 12():580015. PubMed ID: 34385940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Bergen-Yale Sexual Addiction Scale (BYSAS): Longitudinal Measurement Invariance Across a Two-Year Interval.
    Gomez R; Brown T; Stavropoulos V
    Psychiatr Q; 2024 Dec; 95(4):561-577. PubMed ID: 39207570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.