148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29796373)
21. Biomechanical comparison of adjacent segmental motion after ventral cervical fixation with varying angles of lordosis.
Hwang SH; Kayanja M; Milks RA; Benzel EC
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):216-21. PubMed ID: 17321972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Facet joint degeneration of the cervical spine: a computed tomographic analysis of 320 patients.
Park MS; Lee YB; Moon SH; Lee HM; Kim TH; Oh JB; Riew KD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(12):E713-8. PubMed ID: 24718073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Motion compensation associated with single-level cervical fusion: where does the lost motion go?
Schwab JS; Diangelo DJ; Foley KT
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Oct; 31(21):2439-48. PubMed ID: 17023853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Kinematic analysis of the relationship between sagittal alignment and disc degeneration in the cervical spine.
Miyazaki M; Hymanson HJ; Morishita Y; He W; Zhang H; Wu G; Kong MH; Tsumura H; Wang JC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Nov; 33(23):E870-6. PubMed ID: 18978580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Kinematics of the subaxial cervical spine in rotation in vivo three-dimensional analysis.
Ishii T; Mukai Y; Hosono N; Sakaura H; Fujii R; Nakajima Y; Tamura S; Sugamoto K; Yoshikawa H
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2826-31. PubMed ID: 15599286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Biomechanical comparison of single- and two-level cervical arthroplasty versus arthrodesis: effect on adjacent-level spinal kinematics.
Cunningham BW; Hu N; Zorn CM; McAfee PC
Spine J; 2010 Apr; 10(4):341-9. PubMed ID: 20362252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Apparent Diffusion Coefficient of Diffusion-Weighted Imaging in Evaluation of Cervical Intervertebral Disc Degeneration: An Observational Study with 3.0 T Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Chen P; Wu C; Huang M; Jin G; Shi Q; Han Z; Chen C
Biomed Res Int; 2018; 2018():6843053. PubMed ID: 29670903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. The Occupancy of the Components in the Cervical Spine and Their Changes with Extension and Flexion.
Sayıt E; Aghdasi B; Daubs MD; Wang JC
Global Spine J; 2015 Oct; 5(5):396-405. PubMed ID: 26430594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In-vivo T2-relaxation times of asymptomatic cervical intervertebral discs.
Driscoll SJ; Zhong W; Torriani M; Mao H; Wood KB; Cha TD; Li G
Skeletal Radiol; 2016 Mar; 45(3):393-400. PubMed ID: 26643385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Risk factors for missed dynamic canal stenosis in the cervical spine.
Hayashi T; Wang JC; Suzuki A; Takahashi S; Scott TP; Phan K; Lord EL; Ruangchainikom M; Shiba K; Daubs MD
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 May; 39(10):812-9. PubMed ID: 24583725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. A retrospective study: Does cigarette smoking induce cervical disc degeneration?
Chen Z; Li X; Pan F; Wu D; Li H
Int J Surg; 2018 May; 53():269-273. PubMed ID: 29649666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Predictability of severity of disc degeneration and disc protrusion using horizontal displacement of cervical dynamic radiographs: A retrospective comparison study with MRI.
Kim CH; Hwang JM; Park JS; Han S; Park D
Medicine (Baltimore); 2018 Jun; 97(25):e11098. PubMed ID: 29924003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Sagittal alignment as a predictor of clinical adjacent segment pathology requiring surgery after anterior cervical arthrodesis.
Park MS; Kelly MP; Lee DH; Min WK; Rahman RK; Riew KD
Spine J; 2014 Jul; 14(7):1228-34. PubMed ID: 24361126
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Is Cervical Sagittal Imbalance a Risk Factor for Adjacent Segment Pathomechanics After Multilevel Fusion?
Patwardhan AG; Khayatzadeh S; Nguyen NL; Havey RM; Voronov LI; Muriuki MG; Carandang G; Smith ZA; Sears W; Lomasney LM; Ghanayem AJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2016 May; 41(10):E580-8. PubMed ID: 26630432
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Normative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data of Age-Related Degenerative Changes in Cervical Disc Morphology.
Machino M; Ito K; Ando K; Kobayashi K; Nakashima H; Kato F; Imagama S
World Neurosurg; 2021 Aug; 152():e502-e511. PubMed ID: 34098133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Focal cervical spinal stenosis causes mechanical strain on the entire cervical spinal cord tissue - A prospective controlled, matched-pair analysis based on phase-contrast MRI.
Wolf K; Reisert M; Beltrán SF; Klingler JH; Hubbe U; Krafft AJ; Egger K; Hohenhaus M
Neuroimage Clin; 2021; 30():102580. PubMed ID: 33578322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Biomechanical Analysis of Cervical Disc Replacement and Fusion Using Single Level, Two Level, and Hybrid Constructs.
Gandhi AA; Kode S; DeVries NA; Grosland NM; Smucker JD; Fredericks DC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2015 Oct; 40(20):1578-85. PubMed ID: 26165217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Analysis of Correlation Between Age and Cervical Facet Joint Degeneration and Modic Changes in Patients with Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.
Lv B; Fan X; Ding H; Ji P; Zhao Y; Wan B; Jiang Q; Luo Y; Xu T; Zhou Z; Chen J; Yuan J; Wang L; Huang A
Med Sci Monit; 2019 Oct; 25():7882-7888. PubMed ID: 31634342
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cervical disc degeneration is associated with a reduction in mobility: A cross-sectional study of 1211 asymptomatic healthy subjects.
Machino M; Nakashima H; Ito K; Ando K; Ito S; Kato F; Imagama S
J Clin Neurosci; 2022 May; 99():342-348. PubMed ID: 35344872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Analysis of segmental cervical spine vertebral motion after prodisc-C cervical disc replacement.
Park JJ; Quirno M; Cunningham MR; Schwarzkopf R; Bendo JA; Spivak JM; Goldstein JA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Apr; 35(8):E285-9. PubMed ID: 20354472
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
