BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

243 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29796918)

  • 1. Computer-based self-training for CT colonography with and without CAD.
    Sali L; Delsanto S; Sacchetto D; Correale L; Falchini M; Ferraris A; Gandini G; Grazzini G; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Morra L; Laghi A; Mascalchi M; Regge D
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Nov; 28(11):4783-4791. PubMed ID: 29796918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. CT colonography: effect of computer-aided detection of colonic polyps as a second and concurrent reader for general radiologists with moderate experience in CT colonography.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Anand VX; Chandra D; Curtin AJ; Lev-Toaff AS; Hermosillo G; Noah R; Raykar V; Salganicoff M; Shaw R; Summerton S; Tappouni RF; Ringel H; Weber M; Wolf M; Obuchowski NA
    Eur Radiol; 2014 Jul; 24(7):1466-76. PubMed ID: 24816931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists.
    Neri E; Faggioni L; Regge D; Vagli P; Turini F; Cerri F; Picano E; Giusti S; Bartolozzi C
    Eur J Radiol; 2011 Nov; 80(2):303-9. PubMed ID: 20832219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Efficacy of computer-aided detection as a second reader for 6-9-mm lesions at CT colonography: multicenter prospective trial.
    Regge D; Della Monica P; Galatola G; Laudi C; Zambon A; Correale L; Asnaghi R; Barbaro B; Borghi C; Campanella D; Cassinis MC; Ferrari R; Ferraris A; Hassan C; Golfieri R; Iafrate F; Iussich G; Laghi A; Massara R; Neri E; Sali L; Venturini S; Gandini G
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):168-76. PubMed ID: 23151831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effect of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a multireader, multicase trial.
    Dachman AH; Obuchowski NA; Hoffmeister JW; Hinshaw JL; Frew MI; Winter TC; Van Uitert RL; Periaswamy S; Summers RM; Hillman BJ
    Radiology; 2010 Sep; 256(3):827-35. PubMed ID: 20663975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection.
    Halligan S; Altman DG; Mallett S; Taylor SA; Burling D; Roddie M; Honeyfield L; McQuillan J; Amin H; Dehmeshki J
    Gastroenterology; 2006 Dec; 131(6):1690-9. PubMed ID: 17087934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of computer-aided detection on the cost-effectiveness of CT colonography.
    Regge D; Hassan C; Pickhardt PJ; Laghi A; Zullo A; Kim DH; Iafrate F; Morini S
    Radiology; 2009 Feb; 250(2):488-97. PubMed ID: 19188317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. One-mSv CT colonography: Effect of different iterative reconstruction algorithms on radiologists' performance.
    Shin CI; Kim SH; Im JP; Kim SG; Yu MH; Lee ES; Han JK
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Mar; 85(3):641-8. PubMed ID: 26860679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings.
    Baker ME; Bogoni L; Obuchowski NA; Dass C; Kendzierski RM; Remer EM; Einstein DM; Cathier P; Jerebko A; Lakare S; Blum A; Caroline DF; Macari M
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):140-9. PubMed ID: 17885187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
    Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
    Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative performance of a primary-reader and second-reader paradigm of computer-aided detection for CT colonography in a low-prevalence screening population.
    Miyake M; Iinuma G; Taylor SA; Halligan S; Morimoto T; Ichikawa T; Tomimatsu H; Beddoe G; Sugimura K; Arai Y
    Jpn J Radiol; 2013 May; 31(5):310-9. PubMed ID: 23420274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study.
    Petrick N; Haider M; Summers RM; Yeshwant SC; Brown L; Iuliano EM; Louie A; Choi JR; Pickhardt PJ
    Radiology; 2008 Jan; 246(1):148-56. PubMed ID: 18096536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Virtual dissection CT colonography: evaluation of learning curves and reading times with and without computer-aided detection.
    Hock D; Ouhadi R; Materne R; Aouchria AS; Mancini I; Broussaud T; Magotteaux P; Nchimi A
    Radiology; 2008 Sep; 248(3):860-8. PubMed ID: 18710980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps in CT colonography with and without fecal tagging: a stand-alone evaluation.
    Mang T; Bogoni L; Salganicoff M; Wolf M; Raykar V; Macari M; Pickhardt PJ; Iafrate F; Laghi A; Weber M; Baker ME; Ringl H; Herold CJ; Graser A
    Invest Radiol; 2012 Feb; 47(2):99-108. PubMed ID: 21934519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography.
    Yoshida H; Dachman AH
    Semin Ultrasound CT MR; 2004 Oct; 25(5):419-31. PubMed ID: 15559125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effect of different reconstruction algorithms on computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) performance in ultra-low dose CT colonography.
    Lee ES; Kim SH; Im JP; Kim SG; Shin CI; Han JK; Choi BI
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Apr; 84(4):547-54. PubMed ID: 25596916
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Incremental benefit of computer-aided detection when used as a second and concurrent reader of CT colonographic data: multiobserver study.
    Halligan S; Mallett S; Altman DG; McQuillan J; Proud M; Beddoe G; Honeyfield L; Taylor SA
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):469-76. PubMed ID: 21084409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of a standardized CT colonography training program for novice readers.
    Liedenbaum MH; Bipat S; Bossuyt PM; Dwarkasing RS; de Haan MC; Jansen RJ; Kauffman D; van der Leij C; de Lijster MS; Lute CC; van der Paardt MP; Thomeer MG; Zijlstra IA; Stoker J
    Radiology; 2011 Feb; 258(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 21177395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk?
    de Vries AH; Jensch S; Liedenbaum MH; Florie J; Nio CY; Truyen R; Bipat S; Dekker E; Fockens P; Baak LC; Stoker J
    Eur Radiol; 2009 Apr; 19(4):941-50. PubMed ID: 18982331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.