137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29797308)
1. Comparison of Current Swiss Fetal Biometry Reference Charts with Reference Charts from 1999. Are Fetuses Getting Bigger?
Knitza J; Kurmanavicius J; Faschingbauer F; Wisser J
Ultraschall Med; 2020 Aug; 41(4):410-417. PubMed ID: 29797308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reference values of fetal ultrasound biometry: results of a prospective cohort study in Lithuania.
Žaliūnas B; Jakaitė V; Kurmanavičius J; Bartkevičienė D; Norvilaitė K; Passerini K
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2022 Nov; 306(5):1503-1517. PubMed ID: 35220480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Chinese fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with charts from other populations.
Zhang Y; Meng H; Jiang Y; Xu Z; Ouyang Y; Li S; Chen Q; Wu Q; Li R; Ru T; Cai A; Chen X; Yang T; Chen P; Xie H; Lu H; Dai Q; Dong F; Yang M; Yang X; Lu J; Tian J; Sun K; Li H;
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 May; 32(9):1507-1515. PubMed ID: 29216774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reference charts and equations of fetal biometry for normal singleton pregnant women in Shaanxi, China.
Jiang X; Zhang YH; Li Y; Ma X; Zhu YS; Shang L
Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol; 2013; 40(3):393-8. PubMed ID: 24283173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Which fetal growth charts should be used? A retrospective observational study in China.
Zhao J; Yuan Y; Tao J; Chen C; Wu X; Liao Y; Wu L; Zeng Q; Chen Y; Wang K; Li X; Liu Z; Zhou J; Zhou Y; Li S; Zhu J
Chin Med J (Engl); 2022 Aug; 135(16):1969-1977. PubMed ID: 36070466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. French fetal biometry: reference equations and comparison with other charts.
Salomon LJ; Duyme M; Crequat J; Brodaty G; Talmant C; Fries N; Althuser M
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Aug; 28(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 16570263
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Fetal Biometry in the Israeli Population: New Reference Charts.
Daniel-Spiegel E; Mandel M; Nevo D; Ben-Chetrit A; Shen O; Shalev E; Yagel S
Isr Med Assoc J; 2016 Jan; 18(1):40-4. PubMed ID: 26964279
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Reference charts and equations of Korean fetal biometry.
Jung SI; Lee YH; Moon MH; Song MJ; Min JY; Kim JA; Park JH; Yang JH; Kim MY; Chung JH; Cho JY; Kim KG
Prenat Diagn; 2007 Jun; 27(6):545-51. PubMed ID: 17431930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrasound biometry of Arabian fetuses.
Nasrat H; Bondagji NS
Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2005 Feb; 88(2):173-8. PubMed ID: 15694104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Impact of biometric measurement error on identification of small- and large-for-gestational-age fetuses.
Wright D; Wright A; Smith E; Nicolaides KH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2020 Feb; 55(2):170-176. PubMed ID: 31682299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Fetal biometry in the Korean population: reference charts and comparison with charts from other populations.
Kwon JY; Park IY; Wie JH; Choe S; Kim CJ; Shin JC
Prenat Diagn; 2014 Oct; 34(10):927-34. PubMed ID: 24760468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Charts for fetal age assessment based on fetal sonographic biometry in a population from Cali, Colombia.
Briceño F; Restrepo H; Paredes R; Cifuentes R
J Ultrasound Med; 2013 Dec; 32(12):2135-43. PubMed ID: 24277896
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Fetal Medicine Foundation fetal and neonatal population weight charts.
Nicolaides KH; Wright D; Syngelaki A; Wright A; Akolekar R
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Jul; 52(1):44-51. PubMed ID: 29696704
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of choice of reference charts and equations on the assessment of fetal biometry.
Salomon LJ; Bernard JP; Duyme M; Buvat I; Ville Y
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2005 Jun; 25(6):559-65. PubMed ID: 15909324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of replacing Chinese ethnicity-specific fetal biometry charts with the INTERGROWTH-21(st) standard.
Cheng Y; Leung TY; Lao T; Chan YM; Sahota DS
BJOG; 2016 Sep; 123 Suppl 3():48-55. PubMed ID: 27627597
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Fetal biometry charts for normal pregnant women in northeastern Thailand.
Saksiriwuttho P; Ratanasiri T; Komwilaisak R
J Med Assoc Thai; 2007 Oct; 90(10):1963-9. PubMed ID: 18041409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorporation of femur length leads to underestimation of fetal weight in asymmetric preterm growth restriction.
Proctor LK; Rushworth V; Shah PS; Keunen J; Windrim R; Ryan G; Kingdom J
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2010 Apr; 35(4):442-8. PubMed ID: 20196066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Construction of fetal charts for biparietal diameter, fetal abdominal circumference and femur length in Bangladeshi population.
Ashrafunnessa ; Jehan AH; Chowdhury SB; Sultana F; Haque JA; Khatun S; Karim MA
Bangladesh Med Res Counc Bull; 2003 Aug; 29(2):67-77. PubMed ID: 14674622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fetal biometry assessment with Intergrowth 21st's and Salomon's equations in rural Burkina Faso.
Bihoun B; Zango SH; Traoré-Coulibaly M; Valea I; Ravinetto R; Van Geertruyden JP; D'Alessandro U; Tinto H; Robert A
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Aug; 20(1):492. PubMed ID: 32847549
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Fetal biometry in ethnic Chinese: biparietal diameter, head circumference, abdominal circumference and femur length.
Leung TN; Pang MW; Daljit SS; Leung TY; Poon CF; Wong SM; Lau TK
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Mar; 31(3):321-7. PubMed ID: 18241086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
