These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

272 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29797806)

  • 21. Ultramorphology of the root surface subsequent to hand-ultrasonic simultaneous instrumentation during non-surgical periodontal treatments: an in vitro study.
    Aspriello SD; Piemontese M; Levrini L; Sauro S
    J Appl Oral Sci; 2011; 19(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 21437474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. An in vitro evaluation of zirconia surface roughness caused by different scaling methods.
    Vigolo P; Motterle M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 May; 103(5):283-7. PubMed ID: 20416411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Root surface roughness in response to periodontal instrumentation studied by combined use of microroughness measurements and scanning electron microscopy.
    Meyer K; Lie T
    J Clin Periodontol; 1977 May; 4(2):77-91. PubMed ID: 266507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Er:YAG laser scaling of diseased root surfaces.
    Frentzen M; Braun A; Aniol D
    J Periodontol; 2002 May; 73(5):524-30. PubMed ID: 12027255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Root surface texture after different scaling modalities.
    Jacobson L; Blomlöf J; Lindskog S
    Scand J Dent Res; 1994 Jun; 102(3):156-60. PubMed ID: 8085122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Analysing root roughness and smear layer relationship by comparing contemporary dental curettes with conventional dental curettes: a randomised controlled trial.
    Riaz S; Ahmed S; Shabbir S; Khan ZR; Zaidi SJA; Naeem MM; Farooqui WA
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Jun; 22(1):237. PubMed ID: 35715802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Root instrumentation. Power-driven versus manual scalers, which one?
    Drisko CH
    Dent Clin North Am; 1998 Apr; 42(2):229-44. PubMed ID: 9597335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the effects of different instrumentation techniques on root surface roughness and cement loss using micro-computerized tomography: An in-vitro study.
    Karacaoglu F; Orhan K
    Int J Dent Hyg; 2022 May; 20(2):339-346. PubMed ID: 34390126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Effect of root planing on surface topography: an in-vivo randomized experimental trial.
    Rosales-Leal JI; Flores AB; Contreras T; Bravo M; Cabrerizo-Vílchez MA; Mesa F
    J Periodontal Res; 2015 Apr; 50(2):205-10. PubMed ID: 24824304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The periodontally-involved root surface.
    Corbet EF; Vaughan AJ; Kieser JB
    J Clin Periodontol; 1993 Jul; 20(6):402-10. PubMed ID: 8349832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Efficiency of subgingival calculus removal with the Vector-system compared to ultrasonic scaling and hand instrumentation in vitro.
    Braun A; Krause F; Frentzen M; Jepsen S
    J Periodontal Res; 2005 Feb; 40(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 15613079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The effectiveness of scaling and root planing with curets designed for deep pockets.
    Nagy RJ; Otomo-Corgel J; Stambaugh R
    J Periodontol; 1992 Dec; 63(12):954-9. PubMed ID: 1474467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative SEM study between hand instrument and Er:YAG laser scaling and root planing.
    Moghare Abed A; Tawakkoli M; Dehchenari MA; Gutknecht N; Mir M
    Lasers Med Sci; 2007 Mar; 22(1):25-9. PubMed ID: 17115236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. The effect of miniaturized manual versus mechanical instruments on calculus removal and root surface characteristics: An in vitro light microscopic study.
    Profili F; Sparabombe S; Tawse Smith A; D'Isidoro O; Quaranta A
    Clin Exp Dent Res; 2019 Oct; 5(5):519-527. PubMed ID: 31687186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Evaluation of the Effects of Er,Cr:YSGG Laser, Ultrasonic Scaler and Curette on Root Surface Profile Using Surface Analyser and Scanning Electron Microscope: An In Vitro Study.
    Arora S; Lamba AK; Faraz F; Tandon S; Ahad A
    J Lasers Med Sci; 2016; 7(4):243-249. PubMed ID: 28491260
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The effectiveness of the Titan-S sonic scaler versus curettes in the removal of subgingival calculus. A human surgical evaluation.
    Gellin RG; Miller MC; Javed T; Engler WO; Mishkin DJ
    J Periodontol; 1986 Nov; 57(11):672-80. PubMed ID: 3550033
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of fluorescence-controlled Er:YAG laser radiation, the Vector system and hand instruments on periodontally diseased root surfaces in vivo.
    Schwarz F; Bieling K; Venghaus S; Sculean A; Jepsen S; Becker J
    J Clin Periodontol; 2006 Mar; 33(3):200-8. PubMed ID: 16489946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative effectiveness of ultrasonic and hand scaling for the removal of subgingival plaque and calculus.
    Breininger DR; O'Leary TJ; Blumenshine RV
    J Periodontol; 1987 Jan; 58(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 3543285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. In vitro evaluation of Er:YAG laser scaling of subgingival calculus in comparison with ultrasonic scaling.
    Aoki A; Miura M; Akiyama F; Nakagawa N; Tanaka J; Oda S; Watanabe H; Ishikawa I
    J Periodontal Res; 2000 Oct; 35(5):266-77. PubMed ID: 11005154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Er:YAG Laser, ultrasonic system, and curette produce different profiles on dentine root surfaces: an in vitro study.
    de Mendonça AC; Máximo MB; Rodrigues JA; Arrais CA; de Freitas PM; Duarte PM
    Photomed Laser Surg; 2008 Apr; 26(2):91-7. PubMed ID: 18307394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.