346 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29798012)
21. SpeedCAP: An Efficient Method for Estimating Neural Activation Patterns Using Electrically Evoked Compound Action-Potentials in Cochlear Implant Users.
Garcia C; Deeks JM; Goehring T; Borsetto D; Bance M; Carlyon RP
Ear Hear; 2023 May-Jun 01; 44(3):627-640. PubMed ID: 36477611
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Determining electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds: a comparison of computer versus human analysis methods.
Glassman EK; Hughes ML
Ear Hear; 2013; 34(1):96-109. PubMed ID: 22885406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A new approach for the determination of ECAP thresholds.
Hoth S; Spitzer P; Praetorius M
Cochlear Implants Int; 2018 Mar; 19(2):104-114. PubMed ID: 29161976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. [Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children].
Kechiyan DK; Bakhshinyan VV; Tavartkiladze GA
Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2020; 85(6):17-22. PubMed ID: 33474911
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Relationship between electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds and behavioral T-levels in implanted children with cochlear nerve deficiency.
Chao X; Wang R; Luo J; Wang H; Fan Z; Xu L
Sci Rep; 2023 Mar; 13(1):4309. PubMed ID: 36922582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. [Electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds of pediatric cochlear implant recipients and its clinical application].
Xi X; Hong MD; Han DY; Huang DL; Yang WY
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2003 Feb; 38(1):43-6. PubMed ID: 12778767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The Effects of GJB2 or SLC26A4 Gene Mutations on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Auditory Nerve in Children.
Luo J; Xu L; Chao X; Wang R; Pellittieri A; Bai X; Fan Z; Wang H; He S
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(1):194-207. PubMed ID: 31124793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Two Measurement Paradigms to Determine Electrically Evoked Cochlear Nerve Responses and Their Correlation to Cochlear Nerve Cross-section in Infants and Young Children With Cochlear Implant.
Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
Otol Neurotol; 2024 Mar; 45(3):e206-e213. PubMed ID: 38361306
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Using Neural Response Telemetry to Monitor Physiological Responses to Acoustic Stimulation in Hybrid Cochlear Implant Users.
Abbas PJ; Tejani VD; Scheperle RA; Brown CJ
Ear Hear; 2017; 38(4):409-425. PubMed ID: 28085738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. The Effect of Aging on Auditory Nerve Function: Insights from Intraoperative eCAP Recordings in Cochlear Implant Users.
Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
Otol Neurotol; 2023 Jun; 44(5):447-452. PubMed ID: 37026816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. [The intraoperative application of neural response telemetry with the nucleus CI24M cochlear implant].
Yang H; Tang J; Cao K; Zhu X; Wang Y; Pan T
Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Ke Za Zhi; 2001 Oct; 36(5):352-6. PubMed ID: 12761943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. A Comparison of Alternating Polarity and Forward Masking Artifact-Reduction Methods to Resolve the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Baudhuin JL; Hughes ML; Goehring JL
Ear Hear; 2016; 37(4):e247-55. PubMed ID: 26928001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Effect of cochlear implant electrode array design on auditory nerve and behavioral response in children.
Telmesani LM; Said NM
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2015 May; 79(5):660-5. PubMed ID: 25746517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Identifying Cochlear Implant Channels With Relatively Poor Electrode-Neuron Interfaces Using the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential.
Jahn KN; Arenberg JG
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):961-973. PubMed ID: 31972772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Speech Perception Performance in Cochlear Implant Recipients Correlates to the Number and Synchrony of Excited Auditory Nerve Fibers Derived From Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Dong Y; Briaire JJ; Stronks HC; Frijns JHM
Ear Hear; 2023 Mar-Apr 01; 44(2):276-286. PubMed ID: 36253905
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a novel, noninvasive, objective test of auditory nerve function in cochlear implant candidates.
Gräbel S; Hirschfelder A; Scheiber C; Olze H
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Sep; 30(6):716-24. PubMed ID: 19704358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Application of triphasic pulses with adjustable phase amplitude ratio (PAR) for cochlear ECAP recording: I. amplitude growth functions.
Bahmer A; Baumann U
J Neurosci Methods; 2012 Mar; 205(1):202-11. PubMed ID: 22209768
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The impact of auditory nerve functional states on the correlations between human and computer decisions for electrically evoked compound action potential threshold.
Li Q; Zhang C; Lu T; Xu C; Sun Z; Fan W; Wang Z; Li S
Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2020 Apr; 131():109866. PubMed ID: 31945736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Cochlear Implantation with the CI512 and CI532 Precurved Electrode Arrays: One-Year Speech Recognition and Intraoperative Thresholds of Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potentials.
Videhult Pierre P; Eklöf M; Smeds H; Asp F
Audiol Neurootol; 2019; 24(6):299-308. PubMed ID: 31846976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of congenital inner ear malformations (IEMs) on electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) responses in cochlear implant children.
Said NM; Telmesani LS; Telmesani LM
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2023 Dec; 280(12):5193-5204. PubMed ID: 37606729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
