These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

348 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29798012)

  • 41. Changes in the Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential over time After Implantation and Subsequent Deafening in Guinea Pigs.
    Ramekers D; Benav H; Klis SFL; Versnel H
    J Assoc Res Otolaryngol; 2022 Dec; 23(6):721-738. PubMed ID: 35948695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. ART and AutoART ECAP measurements and cochlear nerve anatomy as predictors in adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Schrank L; Nachtigäller P; Müller J; Hempel JM; Canis M; Spiegel JL; Rader T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 2024 Jul; 281(7):3461-3473. PubMed ID: 38219245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparison of automated and traditional ECAP recording approaches in clinical practice.
    Estienne P; Scaglia A; Kontides A; Lauss K; Schwarz K; Arauz SL
    Int J Audiol; 2022 Jul; 61(7):583-591. PubMed ID: 34187279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Effect of Increasing Pulse Phase Duration on Neural Responsiveness of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve.
    He S; Xu L; Skidmore J; Chao X; Riggs WJ; Wang R; Vaughan C; Luo J; Shannon M; Warner C
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1606-1618. PubMed ID: 33136636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. The Effect of Pulse Polarity on Neural Response of the Electrically Stimulated Cochlear Nerve in Children With Cochlear Nerve Deficiency and Children With Normal-Sized Cochlear Nerves.
    Xu L; Skidmore J; Luo J; Chao X; Wang R; Wang H; He S
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1306-1319. PubMed ID: 32141933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Evoked stapedius reflex and compound action potential thresholds versus most comfortable loudness level: assessment of their relation for charge-based fitting strategies in implant users.
    Walkowiak A; Lorens A; Polak M; Kostek B; Skarzynski H; Szkielkowska A; Skarzynski PH
    ORL J Otorhinolaryngol Relat Spec; 2011; 73(4):189-95. PubMed ID: 21659787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential (ECAP) Measurements in Traditional and Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implantation.
    Nassiri AM; Yawn RJ; Gifford RH; Haynes DS; Roberts JB; Gilbane MS; Murfee J; Bennett ML
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(10):918-926. PubMed ID: 31274070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Normative findings of electrically evoked compound action potential measurements using the neural response telemetry of the Nucleus CI24M cochlear implant system.
    Cafarelli Dees D; Dillier N; Lai WK; von Wallenberg E; van Dijk B; Akdas F; Aksit M; Batman C; Beynon A; Burdo S; Chanal JM; Collet L; Conway M; Coudert C; Craddock L; Cullington H; Deggouj N; Fraysse B; Grabel S; Kiefer J; Kiss JG; Lenarz T; Mair A; Maune S; Müller-Deile J; Piron JP; Razza S; Tasche C; Thai-Van H; Toth F; Truy E; Uziel A; Smoorenburg GF
    Audiol Neurootol; 2005; 10(2):105-16. PubMed ID: 15650302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. The Precision of eCAP Thresholds Derived From Amplitude Growth Functions.
    Biesheuvel JD; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(4):701-711. PubMed ID: 29219858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Modeling the relationship between psychophysical perception and electrically evoked compound action potential threshold in young cochlear implant recipients: clinical implications for implant fitting.
    Thai-Van H; Truy E; Charasse B; Boutitie F; Chanal JM; Cochard N; Piron JP; Ribas S; Deguine O; Fraysse B; Mondain M; Uziel A; Collet L
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Dec; 115(12):2811-24. PubMed ID: 15546789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Electrically evoked compound action potential (ECAP) of the cochlear nerve in response to pulsatile electrical stimulation of the cochlea in the rat: effects of stimulation at high rates.
    Haenggeli A; Zhang JS; Vischer MW; Pelizzone M; Rouiller EM
    Audiology; 1998; 37(6):353-71. PubMed ID: 9888192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Intraoperative Electrically Evoked Compound Action Potential Growth and Maximum Amplitudes in Hearing Preservation Cochlear Implant Recipients.
    Mussoi BS; Woodson E; Sydlowski S
    Otol Neurotol; 2023 Apr; 44(4):e216-e222. PubMed ID: 36946363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. What can stimulus polarity and interphase gap tell us about auditory nerve function in cochlear-implant recipients?
    Hughes ML; Choi S; Glickman E
    Hear Res; 2018 Mar; 359():50-63. PubMed ID: 29307495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Measurement of electrical evoked middle latency response in cochlear implantation operation].
    Wang B; Cao KL; Wang Y; Lu Y
    Zhonghua Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2012 Mar; 47(3):196-201. PubMed ID: 22805019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effect of total intravenous vs volatile anesthetics on intraoperatively acquired electrically evoked compound action potential in children undergoing cochlear implant surgery: A randomized prospective study.
    Alhowary AA; El-Radaideh K; Al-Rusan A; Hani DB; Khraise W; Al Omari A; Alzoubi F
    J Clin Anesth; 2017 Feb; 36():80-83. PubMed ID: 28183580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Slope of electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth function is site-dependent.
    Dziemba OC; Aristeidou A; Brill S
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2021 May; 22(3):136-147. PubMed ID: 33297870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Intra-operative recordings of electrically evoked auditory nerve action potentials in young children by use of neural response telemetry with the nucleus C124M cochlear implant.
    Mason SM; Cope Y; Garnham J; O'Donoghue GM; Gibbin KP
    Br J Audiol; 2001 Aug; 35(4):225-35. PubMed ID: 11694097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Test/Retest Variability of the eCAP Threshold in Advanced Bionics Cochlear Implant Users.
    Stronks HC; Biesheuvel JD; de Vos JJ; Boot MS; Briaire JJ; Frijns JHM
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(6):1457-1466. PubMed ID: 30946135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Facilitation properties in electrically evoked compound action potentials depending on spatial location and on threshold.
    Dambon J; Mewes A; Beyer A; Dambon J; Ambrosch P; Hey M
    Hear Res; 2023 Oct; 438():108858. PubMed ID: 37556897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Late electrically-evoked compound action potentials as markers for acute micro-lesions of spiral ganglion neurons.
    Konerding W; Arenberg JG; Kral A; Baumhoff P
    Hear Res; 2022 Jan; 413():108057. PubMed ID: 32883545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.