193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29798713)
1. Collaborative use of virtual patients after a lecture enhances learning with minimal investment of cognitive load.
Marei HF; Donkers J; Al-Eraky MM; Van Merrienboer JJG
Med Teach; 2019 Mar; 41(3):332-339. PubMed ID: 29798713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The effectiveness of sequencing virtual patients with lectures in a deductive or inductive learning approach.
Marei HF; Donkers J; Al-Eraky MM; van Merrienboer JJG
Med Teach; 2017 Dec; 39(12):1268-1274. PubMed ID: 28936901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The effectiveness of integration of virtual patients in a collaborative learning activity.
Marei HF; Donkers J; Van Merrienboer JJG
Med Teach; 2018 Sep; 40(sup1):S96-S103. PubMed ID: 29730966
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effect of different teaching/learning approaches using virtual patients on student's situational interest and cognitive load: a comparative study.
Fuoad SA; El-Sayed W; Marei H
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Nov; 22(1):763. PubMed ID: 36344961
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Virtual patients designed for training against medical error: Exploring the impact of decision-making on learner motivation.
Woodham LA; Round J; Stenfors T; Bujacz A; Karlgren K; Jivram T; Riklefs V; Poulton E; Poulton T
PLoS One; 2019; 14(4):e0215597. PubMed ID: 31013295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thrive or overload? The effect of task complexity on novices' simulation-based learning.
Haji FA; Cheung JJ; Woods N; Regehr G; de Ribaupierre S; Dubrowski A
Med Educ; 2016 Sep; 50(9):955-68. PubMed ID: 27562895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Embedding a Virtual Patient Simulator in an Interactive Surgical lecture.
Kleinert R; Plum P; Heiermann N; Wahba R; Chang DH; Hölscher AH; Stippel DL
J Surg Educ; 2016; 73(3):433-41. PubMed ID: 26705061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Assessment of Diagnostic Competences With Standardized Patients Versus Virtual Patients: Experimental Study in the Context of History Taking.
Fink MC; Reitmeier V; Stadler M; Siebeck M; Fischer F; Fischer MR
J Med Internet Res; 2021 Mar; 23(3):e21196. PubMed ID: 33661122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Learning clinical reasoning: how virtual patient case format and prior knowledge interact.
Kiesewetter J; Sailer M; Jung VM; Schönberger R; Bauer E; Zottmann JM; Hege I; Zimmermann H; Fischer F; Fischer MR
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 20(1):73. PubMed ID: 32171297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Virtual patient design: exploring what works and why. A grounded theory study.
Bateman J; Allen M; Samani D; Kidd J; Davies D
Med Educ; 2013 Jun; 47(6):595-606. PubMed ID: 23662877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Measuring cognitive load: performance, mental effort and simulation task complexity.
Haji FA; Rojas D; Childs R; de Ribaupierre S; Dubrowski A
Med Educ; 2015 Aug; 49(8):815-27. PubMed ID: 26152493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. History-taking instruction for baccalaureate nursing students by virtual patient training: A retrospective study.
Liu T; Luo J; He H; Zheng J; Zhao J; Li K
Nurse Educ Today; 2018 Dec; 71():97-104. PubMed ID: 30268075
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The relevance of low-fidelity virtual reality simulators compared with other learning methods in basic endovascular skills training.
Aeckersberg G; Gkremoutis A; Schmitz-Rixen T; Kaiser E
J Vasc Surg; 2019 Jan; 69(1):227-235. PubMed ID: 30579447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The impact of small-group virtual patient simulator training on perceptions of individual learning process and curricular integration: a multicentre cohort study of nursing and medical students.
Mestre A; Muster M; El Adib AR; Ösp Egilsdottir H; Byermoen KR; Padilha M; Aguilar T; Tabagari N; Betts L; Sales L; Garcia P; Ling L; Café H; Binnie A; Marreiros A
BMC Med Educ; 2022 May; 22(1):375. PubMed ID: 35578233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Learner preferences regarding integrating, sequencing and aligning virtual patients with other activities in the undergraduate medical curriculum: A focus group study.
Huwendiek S; Duncker C; Reichert F; De Leng BA; Dolmans D; van der Vleuten CP; Haag M; Hoffmann GF; Tönshoff B
Med Teach; 2013 Nov; 35(11):920-9. PubMed ID: 24003850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Limitations of subjective cognitive load measures in simulation-based procedural training.
Naismith LM; Cheung JJ; Ringsted C; Cavalcanti RB
Med Educ; 2015 Aug; 49(8):805-14. PubMed ID: 26152492
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Virtual patients in continuing medical education and residency training: a pilot project for acceptance analysis in the framework of a residency revision course in pediatrics.
Lehmann R; Hanebeck B; Oberle S; Simon A; Choukair D; Tönshoff B; Huwendiek S
GMS Z Med Ausbild; 2015; 32(5):Doc51. PubMed ID: 26604993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Do virtual patients prepare medical students for the real world? Development and application of a framework to compare a virtual patient collection with population data.
Urresti-Gundlach M; Tolks D; Kiessling C; Wagner-Menghin M; Härtl A; Hege I
BMC Med Educ; 2017 Sep; 17(1):174. PubMed ID: 28938884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Virtual patients: a critical literature review and proposed next steps.
Cook DA; Triola MM
Med Educ; 2009 Apr; 43(4):303-11. PubMed ID: 19335571
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Improving Pediatric Basic Life Support Performance Through Blended Learning With Web-Based Virtual Patients: Randomized Controlled Trial.
Lehmann R; Thiessen C; Frick B; Bosse HM; Nikendei C; Hoffmann GF; Tönshoff B; Huwendiek S
J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jul; 17(7):e162. PubMed ID: 26139388
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
