BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

200 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29799272)

  • 21. Surface topography, hardness, and frictional properties of GFRP for esthetic orthodontic wires.
    Inami T; Tanimoto Y; Yamaguchi M; Shibata Y; Nishiyama N; Kasai K
    J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater; 2016 Jan; 104(1):88-95. PubMed ID: 25631358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of friction of stainless steel and esthetic self-ligating brackets in various bracket-archwire combinations.
    Cacciafesta V; Sfondrini MF; Ricciardi A; Scribante A; Klersy C; Auricchio F
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Oct; 124(4):395-402. PubMed ID: 14560269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Static frictional force and surface roughness of nickel-titanium arch wires.
    Prososki RR; Bagby MD; Erickson LC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Oct; 100(4):341-8. PubMed ID: 1927985
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of frictional resistance in esthetic brackets.
    Bazakidou E; Nanda RS; Duncanson MG; Sinha P
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1997 Aug; 112(2):138-44. PubMed ID: 9267224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The dynamic frictional resistance between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Tselepis M; Brockhurst P; West VC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Aug; 106(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 8059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. An in vitro investigation of the influence of self-ligating brackets, low friction ligatures, and archwire on frictional resistance.
    Tecco S; Di Iorio D; Cordasco G; Verrocchi I; Festa F
    Eur J Orthod; 2007 Aug; 29(4):390-7. PubMed ID: 17702800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Resistance to sliding of titanium brackets tested against stainless steel and beta-titanium archwires with second-order angulation in the dry and wet states.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Mar; 131(3):400-11. PubMed ID: 17346598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. An in vitro Evaluation of Friction Characteristics of Conventional Stainless Steel and Self-ligating Stainless Steel Brackets with different Dimensions of Archwires in Various Bracket-archwire Combination.
    Sridharan K; Sandbhor S; Rajasekaran UB; Sam G; Ramees MM; Abraham EA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2017 Aug; 18(8):660-664. PubMed ID: 28816185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. A comparative in vitro study of the frictional characteristics of two types of self-ligating brackets and two types of pre-adjusted edgewise brackets tied with elastomeric ligatures.
    Thomas S; Sherriff M; Birnie D
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Oct; 20(5):589-96. PubMed ID: 9825561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Evaluation of frictional forces during dental alignment: an experimental model with 3 nonleveled brackets.
    Matarese G; Nucera R; Militi A; Mazza M; Portelli M; Festa F; Cordasco G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2008 May; 133(5):708-15. PubMed ID: 18456144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of interbracket distances on the resistance to sliding of orthodontic appliances.
    Whitley JQ; Kusy RP
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2007 Sep; 132(3):360-72. PubMed ID: 17826605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Evaluation of titanium brackets for orthodontic treatment: part I. The passive configuration.
    Kusy RP; Whitley JQ; Ambrose WW; Newman JG
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1998 Nov; 114(5):558-72. PubMed ID: 9810052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A comparative study of frictional forces between orthodontic brackets and arch wires.
    Bednar JR; Gruendeman GW; Sandrik JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1991 Dec; 100(6):513-22. PubMed ID: 1962604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Friction of conventional and self-ligating brackets using a 10 bracket model.
    Tecco S; Festa F; Caputi S; Traini T; Di Iorio D; D'Attilio M
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1041-5. PubMed ID: 16448253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Comparison of the kinetic frictional force between conventional plastic brackets with thermoplastic low-friction module ligation and self-ligating brackets.
    Yanase Y; Ioi H; Uehara M; Hara A; Nakata S; Nakasima A; Counts AL
    World J Orthod; 2009; 10(3):220-3. PubMed ID: 19885424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Evaluation of the effect of bracket and archwire composition on frictional forces in the buccal segments.
    Nair SV; Padmanabhan R; Janardhanam P
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(2):203-8. PubMed ID: 22945710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Physical, mechanical, and flexural properties of 3 orthodontic wires: an in-vitro study.
    Juvvadi SR; Kailasam V; Padmanabhan S; Chitharanjan AB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Nov; 138(5):623-30. PubMed ID: 21055604
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Frictional forces between lingual brackets and archwires measured by a friction tester.
    Park JH; Lee YK; Lim BS; Kim CW
    Angle Orthod; 2004 Dec; 74(6):816-24. PubMed ID: 15673146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Does the design of self-ligating brackets show different behavior in terms of friction?
    Tecco S; Marzo G; Di Bisceglie B; Crincoli V; Tetè S; Festa F
    Orthodontics (Chic.); 2011; 12(4):330-9. PubMed ID: 22299106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Conventionally ligated versus self-ligating metal brackets--a comparative study.
    Reicheneder CA; Gedrange T; Berrisch S; Proff P; Baumert U; Faltermeier A; Muessig D
    Eur J Orthod; 2008 Dec; 30(6):654-60. PubMed ID: 19028673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.