These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29800223)
1. Banning Abortion in Cases of Down Syndrome: Important Lessons for Advances in Genetic Diagnosis. Reingold RB; Gostin LO JAMA; 2018 Jun; 319(23):2375-2376. PubMed ID: 29800223 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The rhetoric of disrespect: uncovering the faulty premises infecting reproductive rights. Reilly EA Am Univ J Gend Soc Policy Law; 1996; 5(1):147-205. PubMed ID: 16594108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Freedom at home: state constitutions and Medicaid funding for abortions. Vanzi LM N M Law Rev; 1996; 26(3):433-54. PubMed ID: 16100794 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Title X, the abortion debate, and the First Amendment. Shapiro AA Columbia Law Rev; 1990 Oct; 90(6):1737-78. PubMed ID: 15739274 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Physicians and the First Amendment. Curfman GD; Morrissey S; Greene MF; Drazen JM N Engl J Med; 2008 Dec; 359(23):2484-5. PubMed ID: 19020318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Vigilante Injustice - Deputizing and Weaponizing the Public to Stop Abortions. Charo RA N Engl J Med; 2021 Oct; 385(16):1441-1443. PubMed ID: 34551227 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Journey through the courts: minors, abortion and the quest for reproductive fairness. Ehrlich JS Yale J Law Fem; 1998; 10(1):1-27. PubMed ID: 16596765 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. State Restrictions on Mifepristone Access - The Case for Federal Preemption. Zettler PJ; Sarpatwari A N Engl J Med; 2022 Feb; 386(8):705-707. PubMed ID: 35020981 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessing the viability of a substantive due process right to in vitro fertilization. Harv Law Rev; 2005 Jun; 118(8):2792-813. PubMed ID: 15988862 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. Abortion rights judgment: a ray of hope! Johari V; Jadhav U Indian J Med Ethics; 2017; 2(3):180-183. PubMed ID: 28279947 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The worst of both worlds?: parental involvement requirements and the privacy rights of mature minors. O'Shaughnessy M Ohio State Law J; 1996; 57(5):1731-65. PubMed ID: 16086519 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Does the Thirteenth Amendment provide a jurisdictional basis for a federal ban on cloning? Vinck SC J Legis; 2003; 30(1):183-91. PubMed ID: 17256218 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A woman decides: Justice O'Connor and due process rights of choice. Davis PC; Gilligan C McGeorge Law Rev; 2001; 32(3):895-914. PubMed ID: 16493803 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. The ideological context of the disability rights critique: where modernity and tradition meet. Dolgin J Fla State Univ Law Rev; 2003; 30(2):343-61. PubMed ID: 15083834 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Resignation of US judge puts reproductive rights at risk. Hopkins Tanne J BMJ; 2005 Jul; 331(7509):130. PubMed ID: 16020851 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Prenatal testing gone awry: the birth of a conflict of ethics and liability. Ackmann EA Indiana Health Law Rev; 2005; 2(1):199-224. PubMed ID: 17111503 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Rights talk and its remedies: the jurisprudence of Mary Ann Glendon. Hagen JD America (NY); 2006 Jan 2-9; 194(1):14-6. PubMed ID: 16459378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Symposium: A Celebration of Reproductive Rights: Twenty-Five Years of Roe v. Wade. Perry T; Garcia MT; Baird B; Frietsche S Womens Rights Law Report; 1998; 19(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 15871152 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. What would you do? Reproductive rights. Weiss GG Med Econ; 2006 Nov; 83(21):45-6, 48-9. PubMed ID: 17154109 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Physicians and the first amendment. Kim HC J Leg Med; 2010 Oct; 31(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 21184316 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]