These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

209 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29800358)

  • 1. Does Implicit Voice Learning Improve Spoken Language Processing? Implications for Clinical Practice.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2018 May; 61(5):1251-1260. PubMed ID: 29800358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implicit Talker Training Improves Comprehension of Auditory Speech in Noise.
    Kreitewolf J; Mathias SR; von Kriegstein K
    Front Psychol; 2017; 8():1584. PubMed ID: 28959226
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of cross-language voice training on speech perception: whose familiar voices are more intelligible?
    Levi SV; Winters SJ; Pisoni DB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2011 Dec; 130(6):4053-62. PubMed ID: 22225059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Short-term implicit voice-learning leads to a Familiar Talker Advantage: The role of encoding specificity.
    Case J; Seyfarth S; Levi SV
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Dec; 144(6):EL497. PubMed ID: 30599692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effects of talker familiarity on spoken word identification in younger and older listeners.
    Yonan CA; Sommers MS
    Psychol Aging; 2000 Mar; 15(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 10755292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Talker familiarity and spoken word recognition in school-age children.
    Levi SV
    J Child Lang; 2015 Jul; 42(4):843-72. PubMed ID: 25159173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Working-memory disruption by task-irrelevant talkers depends on degree of talker familiarity.
    Kreitewolf J; Wöstmann M; Tune S; Plöchl M; Obleser J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 May; 81(4):1108-1118. PubMed ID: 30993655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Talker-specific learning in speech perception.
    Nygaard LC; Pisoni DB
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Apr; 60(3):355-76. PubMed ID: 9599989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Implicit and explicit learning in talker identification.
    Lee JJ; Perrachione TK
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2022 Aug; 84(6):2002-2015. PubMed ID: 35534783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Gradient language dominance affects talker learning.
    Bregman MR; Creel SC
    Cognition; 2014 Jan; 130(1):85-95. PubMed ID: 24211437
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Effect of Talker Familiarity on Sentence Recognition Accuracy in Complex Noise.
    Buntrock MS; Barker BA; Gurries MM; Barrett TS
    Exp Psychol; 2021 Jan; 68(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 34109807
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The advantage of knowing the talker.
    Souza P; Gehani N; Wright R; McCloy D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013 Sep; 24(8):689-700. PubMed ID: 24131605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Audiovisual speech facilitates voice learning.
    Sheffert SM; Olson E
    Percept Psychophys; 2004 Feb; 66(2):352-62. PubMed ID: 15129754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Talker and accent familiarity yield advantages for voice identity perception: A voice sorting study.
    Njie S; Lavan N; McGettigan C
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):175-187. PubMed ID: 35274221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effects of language experience and task demands on talker recognition by children and adults.
    Fecher N; Johnson EK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2018 Apr; 143(4):2409. PubMed ID: 29716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Language Ability and the Familiar Talker Advantage: Generalizing to Unfamiliar Talkers Is What Matters.
    Levi SV; Harel D; Schwartz RG
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2019 May; 62(5):1427-1436. PubMed ID: 31021674
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role of long-term target and masker talker familiarity in children's speech-in-speech recognition.
    Flaherty MM
    Front Psychol; 2024; 15():1369195. PubMed ID: 38784624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Talker familiarity and the accommodation of talker variability.
    Magnuson JS; Nusbaum HC; Akahane-Yamada R; Saltzman D
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2021 May; 83(4):1842-1860. PubMed ID: 33398658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Talker-familiarity benefit in non-native recognition memory and word identification: The role of listening conditions and proficiency.
    Drozdova P; van Hout R; Scharenborg O
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2019 Jul; 81(5):1675-1697. PubMed ID: 30834484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Individual talker differences in voice-onset-time.
    Allen JS; Miller JL; DeSteno D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2003 Jan; 113(1):544-52. PubMed ID: 12558290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.