These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

129 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29801067)

  • 1. Breast Cancer With a Poor Prognosis Diagnosed After Screening Mammography With Negative Results.
    McCarthy AM; Barlow WE; Conant EF; Haas JS; Li CI; Sprague BL; Armstrong K;
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Jul; 4(7):998-1001. PubMed ID: 29801067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Mammography service screening and breast cancer mortality in New Zealand: a National Cohort Study 1999-2011.
    Morrell S; Taylor R; Roder D; Robson B; Gregory M; Craig K
    Br J Cancer; 2017 Mar; 116(6):828-839. PubMed ID: 28183141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Facility Mammography Volume in Relation to Breast Cancer Screening Outcomes.
    Onega T; Goldman LE; Walker RL; Miglioretti DL; Buist DS; Taplin S; Geller BM; Hill DA; Smith-Bindman R
    J Med Screen; 2016 Mar; 23(1):31-7. PubMed ID: 26265482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Characteristics and prognosis of interval cancers after biennial screen-film or full-field digital screening mammography.
    Weber RJ; van Bommel RM; Louwman MW; Nederend J; Voogd AC; Jansen FH; Tjan-Heijnen VC; Duijm LE
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2016 Aug; 158(3):471-83. PubMed ID: 27393617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Overcalling low-risk findings: grouped amorphous calcifications found at screening mammography associated with minimal cancer risk.
    Iwase M; Tsunoda H; Nakayama K; Morishita E; Hayashi N; Suzuki K; Yamauchi H
    Breast Cancer; 2017 Jul; 24(4):579-584. PubMed ID: 27873170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Impact of the transition from screen-film to digital screening mammography on interval cancer characteristics and treatment - a population based study from the Netherlands.
    Nederend J; Duijm LE; Louwman MW; Coebergh JW; Roumen RM; Lohle PN; Roukema JA; Rutten MJ; van Steenbergen LN; Ernst MF; Jansen FH; Plaisier ML; Hooijen MJ; Voogd AC
    Eur J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 50(1):31-9. PubMed ID: 24275518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The Complexity of Achieving the Promise of Precision Breast Cancer Screening.
    Haas JS
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2017 Jan; 109(5):. PubMed ID: 28130476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Bernardi D; Caumo F; Pellegrini M; Brunelli S; Tuttobene P; Bricolo P; Fantò C; Valentini M; Montemezzi S; Macaskill P
    Lancet Oncol; 2013 Jun; 14(7):583-9. PubMed ID: 23623721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Audit of mammography requests in Abakaliki, South-East Nigeria.
    Eni UE; Ekwedigwe KC; Sunday-Adeoye I; Daniyan A; Isikhuemen ME
    World J Surg Oncol; 2017 Mar; 15(1):56. PubMed ID: 28270153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening Mammography: Controversy and Recommendations.
    Layne GP
    W V Med J; 2016; 112(6):26-9. PubMed ID: 29368824
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection and interval cancer rates during the transition from screen-film to digital mammography in population-based screening.
    Sankatsing VDV; Fracheboud J; de Munck L; Broeders MJM; van Ravesteyn NT; Heijnsdijk EAM; Verbeek ALM; Otten JDM; Pijnappel RM; Siesling S; de Koning HJ;
    BMC Cancer; 2018 Mar; 18(1):256. PubMed ID: 29506487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Screening Mammography and Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: Controversies.
    Funaro K; Drukteinis J; Falcon S
    South Med J; 2017 Oct; 110(10):607-613. PubMed ID: 28973699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Digital compared to screen-film mammography: breast cancer prognostic features in an organized screening program.
    Prummel MV; Done SJ; Muradali D; Majpruz V; Brown P; Jiang H; Shumak RS; Yaffe MJ; Holloway CM; Chiarelli AM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2014 Sep; 147(2):389-99. PubMed ID: 25108740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The evolving role of new imaging methods in breast screening.
    Houssami N; Ciatto S
    Prev Med; 2011 Sep; 53(3):123-6. PubMed ID: 21605590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Breast Cancers Detected at Screening MR Imaging and Mammography in Patients at High Risk: Method of Detection Reflects Tumor Histopathologic Results.
    Sung JS; Stamler S; Brooks J; Kaplan J; Huang T; Dershaw DD; Lee CH; Morris EA; Comstock CE
    Radiology; 2016 Sep; 280(3):716-22. PubMed ID: 27097237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minority report - false negative breast assessment in women recalled for suspicious screening mammography: imaging and pathological features, and associated delay in diagnosis.
    Ciatto S; Houssami N; Ambrogetti D; Bonardi R; Collini G; Del Turco MR
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2007 Sep; 105(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 17115112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Physicians discuss ramifications of studies pointing to breast cancer overdiagnosis: New research under way attempts to better define who should be screened and treated.
    Printz C
    Cancer; 2017 Dec; 123(23):4525-4527. PubMed ID: 29149513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital Breast Tomosynthesis: A Brave New World of Mammography Screening.
    Houssami N; Miglioretti DL
    JAMA Oncol; 2016 Jun; 2(6):725-7. PubMed ID: 26892954
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Predictors of surveillance mammography outcomes in women with a personal history of breast cancer.
    Lowry KP; Braunstein LZ; Economopoulos KP; Salama L; Lehman CD; Gazelle GS; Halpern EF; Giess CS; Taghian AG; Lee JM
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Aug; 171(1):209-215. PubMed ID: 29748762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Improved Performance of Adjunctive Ultrasonography After Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Chinese Females.
    Dong H; Huang Y; Song F; Dai H; Liu P; Zhu Y; Wang P; Han J; Hao X; Chen K
    Clin Breast Cancer; 2018 Jun; 18(3):e353-e361. PubMed ID: 28887010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.