These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29801269)

  • 1. Simple method for direct crown base height estimation of individual conifer trees using airborne LiDAR data.
    Luo L; Zhai Q; Su Y; Ma Q; Kelly M; Guo Q
    Opt Express; 2018 May; 26(10):A562-A578. PubMed ID: 29801269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Estimating individual tree aboveground biomass of the mid-subtropical forest using airborne LiDAR technology].
    Liu F; Tan C; Lei PF
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2014 Nov; 25(11):3229-36. PubMed ID: 25898621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Tropical tree size-frequency distributions from airborne lidar.
    Ferraz A; Saatchi SS; Longo M; Clark DB
    Ecol Appl; 2020 Oct; 30(7):e02154. PubMed ID: 32347996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Harvesting tree biomass at the stand level to assess the accuracy of field and airborne biomass estimation in savannas.
    Colgan MS; Asner GP; Swemmer T
    Ecol Appl; 2013 Jul; 23(5):1170-84. PubMed ID: 23967584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Tree parameter extraction in
    Jiang Z; Chen J; Tang LY; Yu C; Xie RG; Huang DL; Su SD
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2024 Feb; 35(2):321-329. PubMed ID: 38523088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating urban above ground biomass with multi-scale LiDAR.
    Wilkes P; Disney M; Vicari MB; Calders K; Burt A
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Jun; 13(1):10. PubMed ID: 29943069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of forest aboveground biomass and uncertainties by integration of field measurements, airborne LiDAR, and SAR and optical satellite data in Mexico.
    Urbazaev M; Thiel C; Cremer F; Dubayah R; Migliavacca M; Reichstein M; Schmullius C
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Feb; 13(1):5. PubMed ID: 29468474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing and correcting topographic effects on forest canopy height retrieval using airborne LiDAR data.
    Duan Z; Zhao D; Zeng Y; Zhao Y; Wu B; Zhu J
    Sensors (Basel); 2015 May; 15(6):12133-55. PubMed ID: 26016907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Individual tree segmentation of airborne and UAV LiDAR point clouds based on the watershed and optimized connection center evolution clustering.
    Li Y; Xie D; Wang Y; Jin S; Zhou K; Zhang Z; Li W; Zhang W; Mu X; Yan G
    Ecol Evol; 2023 Jul; 13(7):e10297. PubMed ID: 37456074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measuring tree diameter using a LiDAR-equipped smartphone: a comparison of smartphone- and caliper-based DBH.
    Gülci S; Yurtseven H; Akay AO; Akgul M
    Environ Monit Assess; 2023 May; 195(6):678. PubMed ID: 37191833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Monitoring small pioneer trees in the forest-tundra ecotone: using multi-temporal airborne laser scanning data to model height growth.
    Hauglin M; Bollandsås OM; Gobakken T; Næsset E
    Environ Monit Assess; 2017 Dec; 190(1):12. PubMed ID: 29222601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Monitoring individual tree-based change with airborne lidar.
    Duncanson L; Dubayah R
    Ecol Evol; 2018 May; 8(10):5079-5089. PubMed ID: 29876083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Estimating standing stocks of the typical conifer stands in Northeast China based on airborne lidar data.
    Yuan YN; Peng DL; Wang W; Zeng WS
    Ying Yong Sheng Tai Xue Bao; 2021 Mar; 32(3):836-844. PubMed ID: 33754548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating stem volume and biomass of Pinus koraiensis using LiDAR data.
    Kwak DA; Lee WK; Cho HK; Lee SH; Son Y; Kafatos M; Kim SR
    J Plant Res; 2010 Jul; 123(4):421-32. PubMed ID: 20182905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A Comparison of Three Airborne Laser Scanner Types for Species Identification of Individual Trees.
    Prieur JF; St-Onge B; Fournier RA; Woods ME; Rana P; Kneeshaw D
    Sensors (Basel); 2021 Dec; 22(1):. PubMed ID: 35009577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Fine-Scale Quantification of Absorbed Photosynthetically Active Radiation (APAR) in Plantation Forests with 3D Radiative Transfer Modeling and LiDAR Data.
    Zhao X; Qi J; Yu Z; Yuan L; Huang H
    Plant Phenomics; 2024; 6():0166. PubMed ID: 38590393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Identification of tree species based on the fusion of UAV hyperspectral image and LiDAR data in a coniferous and broad-leaved mixed forest in Northeast China.
    Zhong H; Lin W; Liu H; Ma N; Liu K; Cao R; Wang T; Ren Z
    Front Plant Sci; 2022; 13():964769. PubMed ID: 36212338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of LiDAR point density, sampling size and height threshold on estimation accuracy of crop biophysical parameters.
    Luo S; Chen JM; Wang C; Xi X; Zeng H; Peng D; Li D
    Opt Express; 2016 May; 24(11):11578-93. PubMed ID: 27410085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [An automatic extraction algorithm for individual tree crown projection area and volume based on 3D point cloud data].
    Xu WH; Feng ZK; Su ZF; Xu H; Jiao YQ; Deng O
    Guang Pu Xue Yu Guang Pu Fen Xi; 2014 Feb; 34(2):465-71. PubMed ID: 24822422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Crown plasticity and competition for canopy space: a new spatially implicit model parameterized for 250 North American tree species.
    Purves DW; Lichstein JW; Pacala SW
    PLoS One; 2007 Sep; 2(9):e870. PubMed ID: 17849000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.