These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29801416)

  • 1. How repetition influences speech understanding by younger, middle-aged and older adults.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL; Merchant GR
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Sep; 57(9):695-702. PubMed ID: 29801416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sentence intelligibility during segmental interruption and masking by speech-modulated noise: Effects of age and hearing loss.
    Fogerty D; Ahlstrom JB; Bologna WJ; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Jun; 137(6):3487-501. PubMed ID: 26093436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Benefit of modulated maskers for speech recognition by younger and older adults with normal hearing.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2002 Jun; 111(6):2897-907. PubMed ID: 12083223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Older and younger adults' identification of sentences filtered with amplitude and frequency modulations in quiet and noise.
    Mahajan Y; Kim J; Davis C
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Aug; 142(2):EL190. PubMed ID: 28863573
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Does it take older adults longer than younger adults to perceptually segregate a speech target from a background masker?
    Ben-David BM; Tse VY; Schneider BA
    Hear Res; 2012 Aug; 290(1-2):55-63. PubMed ID: 22609772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus and listener factors affecting age-related changes in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):748-59. PubMed ID: 25096109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Aging, spatial cues, and single- versus dual-task performance in competing speech perception.
    Helfer KS; Chevalier J; Freyman RL
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Dec; 128(6):3625-33. PubMed ID: 21218894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visually guided auditory attention in a dynamic "cocktail-party" speech perception task: ERP evidence for age-related differences.
    Getzmann S; Wascher E
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():98-108. PubMed ID: 27825858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masked speech perception across the adult lifespan: Impact of age and hearing impairment.
    Goossens T; Vercammen C; Wouters J; van Wieringen A
    Hear Res; 2017 Feb; 344():109-124. PubMed ID: 27845259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Susceptibility to interference by music and speech maskers in middle-aged adults.
    Başkent D; van Engelshoven S; Galvin JJ
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):EL147-53. PubMed ID: 24606308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Simultaneous and forward masking of vowels and stop consonants: Effects of age, hearing loss, and spectral shaping.
    Fogerty D; Bologna WJ; Ahlstrom JB; Dubno JR
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Feb; 141(2):1133. PubMed ID: 28253707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Enhancing listener strategies using a payoff matrix in speech-on-speech masking experiments.
    Thompson ER; Iyer N; Simpson BD; Wakefield GH; Kieras DE; Brungart DS
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Sep; 138(3):1297-304. PubMed ID: 26428768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Aging and Priming on Same/Different Judgments Between Text and Partially Masked Speech.
    Freyman RL; Terpening J; Costanzi AC; Helfer KS
    Ear Hear; 2017; 38(6):672-680. PubMed ID: 28650352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Masking release with changing fundamental frequency: Electric acoustic stimulation resembles normal hearing subjects.
    Auinger AB; Riss D; Liepins R; Rader T; Keck T; Keintzel T; Kaider A; Baumgartner WD; Gstoettner W; Arnoldner C
    Hear Res; 2017 Jul; 350():226-234. PubMed ID: 28527538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Effect of fundamental-frequency and sentence-onset differences on speech-identification performance of young and older adults in a competing-talker background.
    Lee JH; Humes LE
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Sep; 132(3):1700-17. PubMed ID: 22978898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The role of segmentation difficulties in speech-in-speech understanding in older and hearing-impaired adults.
    Woodfield A; Akeroyd MA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2010 Jul; 128(1):EL26-31. PubMed ID: 20649185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Older adults expend more listening effort than young adults recognizing audiovisual speech in noise.
    Gosselin PA; Gagné JP
    Int J Audiol; 2011 Nov; 50(11):786-92. PubMed ID: 21916790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Integration of partial information for spoken and written sentence recognition by older listeners.
    Smith KG; Fogerty D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2016 Jun; 139(6):EL240. PubMed ID: 27369179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric functions for sentence recognition in sinusoidally amplitude-modulated noises.
    Shen Y; Manzano NK; Richards VM
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2015 Dec; 138(6):3613-24. PubMed ID: 26723318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of linguistic experience on the ability to benefit from temporal and spectral masker modulation.
    Calandruccio L; Buss E; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Mar; 135(3):1335-43. PubMed ID: 24606272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.