These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

121 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29801635)

  • 21. Near field communication (NFC) device: Evaluation of MRI issues.
    Sautter M; Sautter N; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2022 Oct; 92():82-87. PubMed ID: 35688399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Evaluation of MR safety for a new liquid embolic device.
    Audet-Griffin AJ; Pakbaz S; Shellock FG
    J Neurointerv Surg; 2014 Oct; 6(8):624-9. PubMed ID: 24142391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Magnetic resonance imaging compatibility and safety of the SOUNDTEC Direct System.
    Dyer RK; Nakmali D; Dormer KJ
    Laryngoscope; 2006 Aug; 116(8):1321-33. PubMed ID: 16885731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Assessment of MRI safety issues for stainless steel sutures used for microtia reconstruction.
    Kraai TL; Loch RB; Shellock FG
    J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg; 2018 Oct; 71(10):1469-1475. PubMed ID: 30007538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Implantable microstimulator: magnetic resonance safety at 1.5 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Cosendai G; Park SM; Nyenhuis JA
    Invest Radiol; 2004 Oct; 39(10):591-9. PubMed ID: 15377938
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessment of MRI issues for the Argus II retinal prosthesis.
    Weiland JD; Faraji B; Greenberg RJ; Humayun MS; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2012 Apr; 30(3):382-9. PubMed ID: 22260934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Metallic stents: evaluation of MR imaging safety.
    Shellock FG; Shellock VJ
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Sep; 173(3):543-7. PubMed ID: 10470877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Breast Tissue Expander With Radiofrequency Identification Port: Assessment of MRI Issues.
    Bayasgalan M; Munhoz AM; Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2020 Jul; 215(1):159-164. PubMed ID: 32406774
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of MRI issues at 7 T for 28 implants and other objects.
    Dula AN; Virostko J; Shellock FG
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Feb; 202(2):401-5. PubMed ID: 24450683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. In Vitro Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of Fragmented, Open-Coil, Percutaneous Peripheral Nerve Stimulation Leads.
    Shellock FG; Zare A; Ilfeld BM; Chae J; Strother RB
    Neuromodulation; 2018 Apr; 21(3):276-283. PubMed ID: 29057550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Cardiac pacemaker: in vitro assessment at 1.5 T.
    Shellock FG; Fieno DS; Thomson LJ; Talavage TM; Berman DS
    Am Heart J; 2006 Feb; 151(2):436-43. PubMed ID: 16442911
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Drug eluting coronary stent: in vitro evaluation of magnet resonance safety at 3 Tesla.
    Shellock FG; Forder JR
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2005; 7(2):415-9. PubMed ID: 15881523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Implantable spinal fusion stimulator: assessment of MR safety and artifacts.
    Shellock FG; Hatfield M; Simon BJ; Block S; Wamboldt J; Starewicz PM; Punchard WF
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2000 Aug; 12(2):214-23. PubMed ID: 10931583
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Effect of Device Configuration and Patient's Body Composition on the RF Heating and Nonsusceptibility Artifact of Deep Brain Stimulation Implants During MRI at 1.5T and 3T.
    Bhusal B; Nguyen BT; Sanpitak PP; Vu J; Elahi B; Rosenow J; Nolt MJ; Lopez-Rosado R; Pilitsis J; DiMarzio M; Golestanirad L
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2021 Feb; 53(2):599-610. PubMed ID: 32860322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. A temperature sensor implant for active implantable medical devices for in vivo subacute heating tests under MRI.
    Silemek B; Acikel V; Oto C; Alipour A; Aykut ZG; Algin O; Atalar E
    Magn Reson Med; 2018 May; 79(5):2824-2832. PubMed ID: 28913978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. In vitro magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of ossicular implants at 3 T.
    Shellock FG; Meepos LN; Stapleton MR; Valencerina S
    Otol Neurotol; 2012 Jul; 33(5):871-7. PubMed ID: 22643444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Metallic surgical instruments for interventional MRI procedures: evaluation of MR safety.
    Shellock FG
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2001 Jan; 13(1):152-7. PubMed ID: 11169818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bilateral neurostimulation systems used for deep brain stimulation: in vitro study of MRI-related heating at 1.5 T and implications for clinical imaging of the brain.
    Bhidayasiri R; Bronstein JM; Sinha S; Krahl SE; Ahn S; Behnke EJ; Cohen MS; Frysinger R; Shellock FG
    Magn Reson Imaging; 2005 May; 23(4):549-55. PubMed ID: 15919600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Assessment of MRI issues at 3-Tesla for metallic surgical implants: findings applied to 61 additional skin closure staples and vessel ligation clips.
    Gill A; Shellock FG
    J Cardiovasc Magn Reson; 2012 Jan; 14(1):3. PubMed ID: 22230200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. The Safety of Using Body-Transmit MRI in Patients with Implanted Deep Brain Stimulation Devices.
    Kahan J; Papadaki A; White M; Mancini L; Yousry T; Zrinzo L; Limousin P; Hariz M; Foltynie T; Thornton J
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0129077. PubMed ID: 26061738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.