BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

233 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29801975)

  • 1. Understanding the Contrast Mechanism in Rotation Elastogram: A Parametric Study.
    Lokesh B; Ten Dam AM; de Korte CL; Thittai AK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2018 Aug; 44(8):1860-1872. PubMed ID: 29801975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rotation Elastogram Estimation Using Synthetic Transmit-aperture Technique: A Feasibility Study.
    B L; Chintada BR; Thittai AK
    Ultrason Imaging; 2017 May; 39(3):189-204. PubMed ID: 28091280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spatial Compounding Technique to Obtain Rotation Elastogram: A Feasibility Study.
    Kothawala A; Chandramoorthi S; Reddy NRK; Thittai AK
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2017 Jun; 43(6):1290-1301. PubMed ID: 28433440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Effect of lesion boundary conditions on axial strain elastograms: a parametric study.
    Thitaikumar A; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Sep; 33(9):1463-7. PubMed ID: 17561335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A novel fast full inversion based breast ultrasound elastography technique.
    Karimi H; Fenster A; Samani A
    Phys Med Biol; 2013 Apr; 58(7):2219-33. PubMed ID: 23475227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Axial-shear strain distributions in an elliptical inclusion model: experimental validation and in vivo examples with implications to breast tumor classification.
    Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2010 May; 36(5):814-20. PubMed ID: 20420971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An analysis of the segmentation threshold used in axial-shear strain elastography.
    Thittai AK; Xia R
    Ultrasonics; 2015 Jan; 55():58-64. PubMed ID: 25173068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visualization of bonding at an inclusion boundary using axial-shear strain elastography: a feasibility study.
    Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Garra BS; Ophir J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 May; 52(9):2615-33. PubMed ID: 17440256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A novel breast software phantom for biomechanical modeling of elastography.
    Bhatti SN; Sridhar-Keralapura M
    Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1748-68. PubMed ID: 22482599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Visualizing the radial and circumferential strain distribution within vessel phantoms using synthetic-aperture ultrasound elastography.
    Korukonda S; Doyley MM
    IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control; 2012 Aug; 59(8):1639-53. PubMed ID: 22899112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Towards quantitative quasi-static ultrasound elastography using a reference layer for liver imaging application: A preliminary assessment.
    Selladurai S; Thittai AK
    Ultrasonics; 2019 Mar; 93():7-17. PubMed ID: 30384008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. On the advantages of imaging the axial-shear strain component of the total shear strain in breast tumors.
    Thittai AK; Galaz B; Ophir J
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2012 Nov; 38(11):2031-7. PubMed ID: 22975036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Signal-to-noise ratio, contrast-to-noise ratio and their trade-offs with resolution in axial-shear strain elastography.
    Thitaikumar A; Krouskop TA; Ophir J
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jan; 52(1):13-28. PubMed ID: 17183125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in finite element simulations of elastosonography for breast lesion detection.
    Celi S; Di Puccio F; Forte P
    J Biomech Eng; 2011 Aug; 133(8):081006. PubMed ID: 21950899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. A regularization-free elasticity reconstruction method for ultrasound elastography with freehand scan.
    Pan X; Liu K; Bai J; Luo J
    Biomed Eng Online; 2014 Sep; 13():132. PubMed ID: 25194553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Study of ultrasound stiffness imaging methods using tissue mimicking phantoms.
    Manickam K; Machireddy RR; Seshadri S
    Ultrasonics; 2014 Feb; 54(2):621-31. PubMed ID: 24083832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of tomosynthesis elastography in a breast-mimicking phantom.
    Engelken FJ; Sack I; Klatt D; Fischer T; Fallenberg EM; Bick U; Diekmann F
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Sep; 81(9):2169-73. PubMed ID: 21724357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quantitative breast elastography from B-mode images.
    Rabin C; Benech N
    Med Phys; 2019 Jul; 46(7):3001-3012. PubMed ID: 30972759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Analysis of shear strain imaging for classifying breast masses: finite element and phantom results.
    Xu H; Varghese T; Madsen EL
    Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6119-27. PubMed ID: 22047376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Importance of the Ultrasound Probe Angle on the Rotation Fill-in Signature in Ultrasound Axial-Shear Strain Imaging.
    Galaz B; Donoso E; Trejo M
    Ultrasound Med Biol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):345-354. PubMed ID: 33162253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.