These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

237 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29802060)

  • 41. Immediate loading of screw-retained all-ceramic crowns in immediate versus delayed single implant placement.
    Vandeweghe S; Nicolopoulos C; Thevissen E; Jimbo R; Wennerberg A; De Bruyn H
    Int J Prosthodont; 2013; 26(5):458-64. PubMed ID: 23998144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Radiographic bone level changes of implant-supported restorations in edentulous and partially dentate patients: 5-year results.
    Gholami H; Mericske-Stern R; Kessler-Liechti G; Katsoulis J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(4):898-904. PubMed ID: 25032770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Crestal bone level changes around immediately placed implants: a systematic review and meta-analyses with at least 12 months' follow-up after functional loading.
    Kinaia BM; Shah M; Neely AL; Goodis HE
    J Periodontol; 2014 Nov; 85(11):1537-48. PubMed ID: 24794689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Subcrestal placement of dental implants with an internal conical connection of 0.5 mm versus 1.5 mm: Outcome of a multicentre randomised controlled trial 1 year after loading.
    Gualini F; Salina S; Rigotti F; Mazzarini C; Longhin D; Grigoletto M; Trullenque-Eriksson A; Sbricoli L; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2017; 10(1):73-82. PubMed ID: 28327696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Preservation of peri-implant soft and hard tissues using platform switching of implants placed in immediate extraction sockets: a proof-of-concept study with 12- to 36-month follow-up.
    Canullo L; Rasperini G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18271382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. A 1-year controlled clinical trial of immediate implants placed in fresh extraction sockets: stability measurements and crestal bone level changes.
    Huber S; Rentsch-Kollàr A; Grogg F; Katsoulis J; Mericske R
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Aug; 14(4):491-500. PubMed ID: 20662863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Crestal bone changes around implants with reduced abutment diameter placed non-submerged and at subcrestal positions: a 1-year radiographic evaluation.
    Donovan R; Fetner A; Koutouzis T; Lundgren T
    J Periodontol; 2010 Mar; 81(3):428-34. PubMed ID: 20192870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. A 5-year retrospective study on Replace Select Tapered dental implants.
    Pettersson P; Sennerby L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2015 Apr; 17(2):286-95. PubMed ID: 23815482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. A randomized prospective multicenter trial evaluating the platform-switching technique for the prevention of postrestorative crestal bone loss.
    Prosper L; Redaelli S; Pasi M; Zarone F; Radaelli G; Gherlone EF
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):299-308. PubMed ID: 19492646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Piezoelectric alveolar ridge-splitting technique with simultaneous implant placement: a cohort study with 2-year radiographic results.
    Bassetti R; Bassetti M; Mericske-Stern R; Enkling N
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2013; 28(6):1570-80. PubMed ID: 24278926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. A histometric evaluation of unloaded non-submerged and submerged implants in the canine mandible.
    Hermann JS; Buser D; Schenk RK; Cochran DL
    J Periodontol; 2000 Sep; 71(9):1412-24. PubMed ID: 11022770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Peri-implant bone reactions to immediate implants placed at different levels in relation to crestal bone. Part I: a pilot study in dogs.
    Negri B; Calvo-Guirado JL; Pardo-Zamora G; Ramírez-Fernández MP; Delgado-Ruíz RA; Muñoz-Guzón F
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):228-235. PubMed ID: 21435017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Three-year post-placement survival of implants mobile at placement.
    Orenstein IH; Tarnow DP; Morris HF; Ochi S
    Ann Periodontol; 2000 Dec; 5(1):32-41. PubMed ID: 11885180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Clinical and radiographic changes around dental implants inserted in different levels in relation to the crestal bone, under different restoration protocols, in the dog model.
    Pontes AE; Ribeiro FS; da Silva VC; Margonar R; Piattelli A; Cirelli JA; Marcantonio E
    J Periodontol; 2008 Mar; 79(3):486-94. PubMed ID: 18315431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Long-term peri-implant bone level changes of non-vascularized fibula bone grafted edentulous patients.
    Duttenhoefer F; Nack C; Doll C; Raguse JD; Hell B; Stricker A; Nelson K; Nahles S
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2015 Jun; 43(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 25863644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Platform switching minimises crestal bone loss around dental implants: truth or myth?
    Romanos GE; Javed F
    J Oral Rehabil; 2014 Sep; 41(9):700-8. PubMed ID: 24860981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Radiographic evaluation of crestal bone levels of delayed implants at medium-term follow-up.
    Bruschi GB; Crespi R; Capparè P; Grande N; Bruschi E; Gherlone E
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2014; 29(2):441-7. PubMed ID: 24683572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Crestal bone changes around titanium implants. Part I: A retrospective radiographic evaluation in humans comparing two non-submerged implant designs with different machined collar lengths.
    Hänggi MP; Hänggi DC; Schoolfield JD; Meyer J; Cochran DL; Hermann JS
    J Periodontol; 2005 May; 76(5):791-802. PubMed ID: 15898941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A 10-year prospective study of ITI dental implants placed in the posterior region. II: Influence of the crown-to-implant ratio and different prosthetic treatment modalities on crestal bone loss.
    Blanes RJ; Bernard JP; Blanes ZM; Belser UC
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Dec; 18(6):707-14. PubMed ID: 17697000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Marginal bone changes around platform-switched conical connection implants placed 1 or 2 mm subcrestally: A multicenter crossover randomized controlled trial.
    Stacchi C; Lamazza L; Rapani A; Troiano G; Messina M; Antonelli A; Giudice A; Lombardi T
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Apr; 25(2):398-408. PubMed ID: 36725016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.