These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29802447)

  • 21. The effect of episodic retrieval on inhibition in task switching.
    Grange JA; Kowalczyk AW; O'Loughlin R
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2017 Aug; 43(8):1568-1583. PubMed ID: 28383961
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Task reconfiguration and carryover in task switching: an event-related potential study.
    Hsieh S; Cheng P
    Brain Res; 2006 Apr; 1084(1):132-45. PubMed ID: 16647689
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Neurophysiological signature of effective anticipatory task-set control: a task-switching investigation.
    Lavric A; Mizon GA; Monsell S
    Eur J Neurosci; 2008 Sep; 28(5):1016-29. PubMed ID: 18717737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Investigating task preparation and task performance as triggers of the backward inhibition effect.
    Prosser LJ; Yamaguchi M; Swainson R
    Psychol Res; 2023 Sep; 87(6):1816-1835. PubMed ID: 36571593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Improved memory for error feedback.
    Van der Borght L; Schouppe N; Notebaert W
    Psychol Res; 2016 Nov; 80(6):1049-1058. PubMed ID: 26358052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Cue-based preparation and stimulus-based priming of tasks in task switching.
    Koch I; Allport A
    Mem Cognit; 2006 Mar; 34(2):433-44. PubMed ID: 16752606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Task preparation and task inhibition: a comment on Koch, Gade, Schuch, & Philipp (2010).
    Grange JA; Houghton G
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2011 Feb; 18(1):211-6. PubMed ID: 21327359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Cognitive control during a spatial Stroop task: Comparing conflict monitoring and prediction of response-outcome theories.
    Pires L; Leitão J; Guerrini C; Simões MR
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Sep; 189():63-75. PubMed ID: 28683927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. No evidence for common processes of cognitive control and self-control.
    Scherbaum S; Frisch S; Holfert AM; O'Hora D; Dshemuchadse M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jan; 182():194-199. PubMed ID: 29202280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The interplay of crossmodal attentional preparation and modality compatibility in cued task switching.
    Fintor E; Stephan DN; Koch I
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2019 Apr; 72(4):955-965. PubMed ID: 29642783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Incorrect predictions reduce switch costs.
    Kleinsorge T; Scheil J
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Jul; 159():52-60. PubMed ID: 26024967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Response inhibition in the task-switching paradigm.
    Liu H; Zhang Q
    Biol Psychol; 2020 Oct; 156():107954. PubMed ID: 32976924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Turning distractors into targets increases the congruency sequence effect.
    Grant LD; Weissman DH
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2019 Jan; 192():31-41. PubMed ID: 30408614
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Cognitive control in number processing: new evidence from number compatibility effects in task-switching.
    Schliephake A; Bahnmueller J; Willmes K; Koch I; Moeller K
    Cogn Process; 2022 May; 23(2):191-202. PubMed ID: 35133537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Control processes through the suppression of the automatic response activation triggered by task-irrelevant information in the Simon-type tasks.
    Kim S; Lee SH; Cho YS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2015 Nov; 162():51-61. PubMed ID: 26479902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Different mechanisms can account for the instruction induced proportion congruency effect.
    Desender K
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Mar; 184():39-45. PubMed ID: 28366273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Task switching with a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping: separating cue disambiguation from task-rule retrieval.
    Kleinsorge T
    Psychol Res; 2012 May; 76(3):329-35. PubMed ID: 21617987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency.
    Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Reduced flexibility of cognitive control: reactive, but not proactive control, underpins the congruency sequence effect.
    Yang Q; Pourtois G
    Psychol Res; 2022 Mar; 86(2):474-484. PubMed ID: 33779833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. On the reliability of behavioral measures of cognitive control: retest reliability of task-inhibition effect, task-preparation effect, Stroop-like interference, and conflict adaptation effect.
    Schuch S; Philipp AM; Maulitz L; Koch I
    Psychol Res; 2022 Oct; 86(7):2158-2184. PubMed ID: 34921344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.