426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980253)
1. A comparative biomechanical study of spinal fixation using the combination spinal rod-plate and transpedicular screw fixation system.
Chang KW; Dewei Z; McAfee PC; Warden KE; Farey ID; Gurr KR
J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):257-66. PubMed ID: 2980253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical analysis of anterior and posterior instrumentation systems after corpectomy. A calf-spine model.
Gurr KR; McAfee PC; Shih CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Sep; 70(8):1182-91. PubMed ID: 3417703
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The biomechanical effects of spondylolysis and its treatment.
Mihara H; Onari K; Cheng BC; David SM; Zdeblick TA
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Feb; 28(3):235-8. PubMed ID: 12567023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Two in vivo surgical approaches for lumbar corpectomy using allograft and a metallic implant: a controlled clinical and biomechanical study.
Huang P; Gupta MC; Sarigul-Klijn N; Hazelwood S
Spine J; 2006; 6(6):648-58. PubMed ID: 17088195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Preclinical testing of a wedge-rod system for fusionless correction of scoliosis.
Betz RR; Cunningham B; Selgrath C; Drewry T; Sherman MC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S275-8. PubMed ID: 14560203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Biomechanical analysis of posterior instrumentation systems after decompressive laminectomy. An unstable calf-spine model.
Gurr KR; McAfee PC; Shih CM
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1988 Jun; 70(5):680-91. PubMed ID: 3392061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of cervical spine reconstructive techniques after a multilevel corpectomy of the cervical spine.
Singh K; Vaccaro AR; Kim J; Lorenz EP; Lim TH; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):2352-8; discussion 2358. PubMed ID: 14560082
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Anterior spinal fixators. A biomechanical in vitro study.
Zdeblick TA; Warden KE; Zou D; McAfee PC; Abitbol JJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Mar; 18(4):513-7. PubMed ID: 8470014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanical comparison of two-level cervical locking posterior screw/rod and hook/rod techniques.
Espinoza-Larios A; Ames CP; Chamberlain RH; Sonntag VK; Dickman CA; Crawford NR
Spine J; 2007; 7(2):194-204. PubMed ID: 17321969
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior thoracolumbar instrumentation: stiffness and load sharing characteristics of plate and rod systems.
Brodke DS; Gollogly S; Bachus KN; Alexander Mohr R; Nguyen BK
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(16):1794-801. PubMed ID: 12923465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Biomechanical evaluation of conventional internal contemporary spinal fixation techniques used for stabilization of complete sacroiliac joint separation: a 3-dimensional unilaterally isolated experimental stiffness study.
Korovessis PG; Magnissalis EA; Deligianni D
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E941-51. PubMed ID: 17139210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New rod-plate anterior instrumentation for thoracolumbar/lumbar scoliosis: biomechanical evaluation compared with dual-rod and single-rod with structural interbody support.
Zhang H; Johnston CE; Pierce WA; Ashman RB; Bronson DG; Haideri NF
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2006 Dec; 31(25):E934-40. PubMed ID: 17139209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Biomechanical evaluation of spinal fixation devices. Part III. Stability provided by six spinal fixation devices and interbody bone graft.
Abumi K; Panjabi MM; Duranceau J
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1989 Nov; 14(11):1249-55. PubMed ID: 2603059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical effect of the extent of vertebral body fracture on the thoracolumbar spine with pedicle screw fixation: an in vitro study.
Wang XY; Dai LY; Xu HZ; Chi YL
J Clin Neurosci; 2008 Mar; 15(3):286-90. PubMed ID: 18226530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Biomechanical evaluation of five fixation techniques for the lower cervical spine].
Wang D; Tang T; Huang S; Yang H; Zhu Q; Oyang J
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 1999 May; 37(5):301-3. PubMed ID: 11829846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Enhancing the stability of anterior lumbar interbody fusion: a biomechanical comparison of anterior plate versus posterior transpedicular instrumentation.
Tzermiadianos MN; Mekhail A; Voronov LI; Zook J; Havey RM; Renner SM; Carandang G; Abjornson C; Patwardhan AG
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2008 Jan; 33(2):E38-43. PubMed ID: 18197089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Biomechanical evaluation of short-segment posterior instrumentation with and without crosslinks in a human cadaveric unstable thoracolumbar burst fracture model.
Wahba GM; Bhatia N; Bui CN; Lee KH; Lee TQ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 Feb; 35(3):278-85. PubMed ID: 20075769
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Immediate biomechanical effects of lumbar posterior dynamic stabilization above a circumferential fusion.
Cheng BC; Gordon J; Cheng J; Welch WC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Nov; 32(23):2551-7. PubMed ID: 17978653
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Static and dynamic analysis of five anterior instrumentation systems for thoracolumbar scoliosis.
Shimamoto N; Kotani Y; Shono Y; Kadoya K; Abumi K; Minami A; Kaneda K
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Aug; 28(15):1678-85. PubMed ID: 12897491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Biomechanical evaluation of total disc replacement arthroplasty: an in vitro human cadaveric model.
Cunningham BW; Gordon JD; Dmitriev AE; Hu N; McAfee PC
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Oct; 28(20):S110-7. PubMed ID: 14560182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
