These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2980256)

  • 1. Three-dimensional spinal motion measurements. Part 2: A noninvasive assessment of lumbar brace immobilization of the spine.
    Buchalter D; Kahanovitz N; Viola K; Dorsky S; Nordin M
    J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):284-6. PubMed ID: 2980256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effects of three different types of orthoses on the range of motion of the lumbar spine during 15 activities of daily living.
    Jegede KA; Miller CP; Bible JE; Whang PG; Grauer JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(26):2346-53. PubMed ID: 21358469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of Movement Restriction of Spinal Orthoses Using Inertial Measurement Units.
    Fercho J; Krakowiak M; Yuser R; Szmuda T; Zieliński P; Szarek D; Pettersson SD; Miękisiak G
    Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Dec; 19(24):. PubMed ID: 36554395
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Stabilization of 2-column thoracolumbar fractures with orthoses: a cadaver model.
    Rubery PT; Brown R; Prasarn M; Small J; Conrad B; Horodyski M; Rechtine G
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Mar; 38(5):E270-5. PubMed ID: 23211532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. I. Restriction of gross body motions.
    Lantz SA; Schultz AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):834-7. PubMed ID: 3810301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Postoperative stabilization of the posttraumatic thoracic and lumbar spine: a review of concepts and orthotic techniques.
    Benzel EC; Larson SJ
    J Spinal Disord; 1989 Mar; 2(1):47-51. PubMed ID: 2520056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Lower spinal mobility and external immobilization in the normal and pathologic condition.
    Miller RA; Hardcastle P; Renwick SE
    Orthop Rev; 1992 Jun; 21(6):753-7. PubMed ID: 1614722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficacy of Thoracolumbar Bracing in Spinal Immobilization: Precise Assessment of Gross, Intersegmental, and Segmental Spinal Motion Restriction by a 3D Kinematic System.
    Lang G; Hirschmüller A; Patermann S; Eichelberger P; Strohm P; Baur H; Südkamp NP; Herget GW
    World Neurosurg; 2018 Aug; 116():e128-e146. PubMed ID: 29729467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of motion restriction and trunk stiffness provided by three thoracolumbosacral orthoses (TLSOs).
    Cholewicki J; Alvi K; Silfies SP; Bartolomei J
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2003 Oct; 16(5):461-8. PubMed ID: 14526195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Lumbar spine orthosis wearing. II. Effect on trunk muscle myoelectric activity.
    Lantz SA; Schultz AB
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1986 Oct; 11(8):838-42. PubMed ID: 3810302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of four types of support on the segmental mobility of the lumbosacral spine.
    Fidler MW; Plasmans CM
    J Bone Joint Surg Am; 1983 Sep; 65(7):943-7. PubMed ID: 6224799
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Lumbar spine stabilization with a thoracolumbosacral orthosis: evaluation with video fluoroscopy.
    Vander Kooi D; Abad G; Basford JR; Maus TP; Yaszemski MJ; Kaufman KR
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Jan; 29(1):100-4. PubMed ID: 14699284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A prophylactic lumbosacral brace and the biomechanics of parachute landing.
    Wu D; Zheng C; Wang L; Huang R; Liu J; Wang X; Lian X; Wei X; Wu J; Zhang C
    Ann Transl Med; 2023 Jun; 11(9):314. PubMed ID: 37405007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Three-dimensional spinal motion measurements. Part 1: A technique for examining posture and functional spinal motion.
    Buchalter D; Parnianpour M; Viola K; Nordin M; Kahanovitz N
    J Spinal Disord; 1988; 1(4):279-83. PubMed ID: 2980255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Modern orthotics for spinal deformities.
    Winter RB; Carlson JM
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 1977; (126):74-86. PubMed ID: 598143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Treatment of lumbar and dorso-lumbar scoliosis using the Boston orthosis and the 3-valve orthosis. Comparative study of the results in the frontal and horizontal planes].
    Fiore N; Onimus M; Ferre B; Laurain JM
    Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot; 1988; 74(6):569-75. PubMed ID: 3070653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Decision making in surgical treatment of chronic low back pain: the performance of prognostic tests to select patients for lumbar spinal fusion.
    Willems P
    Acta Orthop Suppl; 2013 Feb; 84(349):1-35. PubMed ID: 23427903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of the Boston thoracic brace on the frontal and sagittal curves of the spine.
    Willner S
    Acta Orthop Scand; 1984 Aug; 55(4):457-60. PubMed ID: 6475514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The halo-Milwaukee brace. Case series of a revived technique.
    Godfried DH; Amory DW; Lubicky JP
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1999 Nov; 24(21):2273-7. PubMed ID: 10562996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Do cervical collars and cervicothoracic orthoses effectively stabilize the injured cervical spine? A biomechanical investigation.
    Ivancic PC
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2013 Jun; 38(13):E767-74. PubMed ID: 23486409
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.