224 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29802773)
1. Effects of pathological upstaging or upgrading on metastasis and cancer-specific mortality in men with clinical low-risk prostate cancer.
Kovac E; Vertosick EA; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ; Stephenson AJ
BJU Int; 2018 Dec; 122(6):1003-1009. PubMed ID: 29802773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Heterogeneity in D'Amico classification-based low-risk prostate cancer: Differences in upgrading and upstaging according to active surveillance eligibility.
Schiffmann J; Wenzel P; Salomon G; Budäus L; Schlomm T; Minner S; Wittmer C; Kraft S; Krech T; Steurer S; Sauter G; Beyer B; Boehm K; Tilki D; Michl U; Huland H; Graefen M; Karakiewicz PI
Urol Oncol; 2015 Jul; 33(7):329.e13-9. PubMed ID: 25960411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Outcomes of men with an elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level as their sole preoperative intermediate- or high-risk feature.
Faisal FA; Sundi D; Pierorazio PM; Ball MW; Humphreys EB; Han M; Epstein JI; Partin AW; Carter HB; Bivalacqua TJ; Schaeffer EM; Ross AE
BJU Int; 2014 Dec; 114(6b):E120-E129. PubMed ID: 24731026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The presence of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia or atypia on prostate biopsy does not adversely affect prostatectomy outcomes for patients otherwise eligible for active surveillance.
Pietzak EJ; Kabarriti AE; Mucksavage P; Bavaria T; Van Arsdalen K; Malkowicz SB; Wein AJ; Guzzo TJ
Urology; 2014 Dec; 84(6):1442-7. PubMed ID: 25288572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Higher rates of upgrading and upstaging in older patients undergoing radical prostatectomy and qualifying for active surveillance.
Busch J; Magheli A; Leva N; Ferrari M; Kramer J; Klopf C; Kempkensteffen C; Miller K; Brooks JD; Gonzalgo ML
BJU Int; 2014 Oct; 114(4):517-21. PubMed ID: 24112652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Impact of Prostate Cancer Upgrading and Upstaging on Biochemical Recurrence and Cancer-Specific Survival.
Bakavičius A; Drevinskaitė M; Daniūnaitė K; Barisienė M; Jarmalaitė S; Jankevičius F
Medicina (Kaunas); 2020 Feb; 56(2):. PubMed ID: 32033148
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Pathological and biochemical outcomes after radical prostatectomy in men with low-risk prostate cancer meeting the Prostate Cancer International: Active Surveillance criteria.
Mitsuzuka K; Narita S; Koie T; Kaiho Y; Tsuchiya N; Yoneyama T; Kakoi N; Kawamura S; Tochigi T; Habuchi T; Ohyama C; Arai Y
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(6):914-20. PubMed ID: 23320782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Adverse Pathologic Features at Radical Prostatectomy: Effect of Preoperative Risk on Oncologic Outcomes.
Imnadze M; Sjoberg DD; Vickers AJ
Eur Urol; 2016 Jan; 69(1):143-8. PubMed ID: 25913389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radical prostatectomy represents an effective treatment in patients with specimen-confined high pathological Gleason score prostate cancer.
Lughezzani G; Gallina A; Larcher A; Briganti A; Capitanio U; Suardi N; Lista G; Abrate A; Sangalli MN; Buffi N; Cestari A; Guazzoni G; Rigatti P; Montorsi F
BJU Int; 2013 May; 111(5):723-30. PubMed ID: 22487441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Low serum testosterone predicts upgrading and upstaging of prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy.
Gao Y; Jiang CY; Mao SK; Cui D; Hao KY; Zhao W; Jiang Q; Ruan Y; Xia SJ; Han BM
Asian J Androl; 2016; 18(4):639-43. PubMed ID: 26732103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. No detrimental effect of a positive family history on postoperative upgrading and upstaging in men with low risk and favourable intermediate-risk prostate cancer: implications for active surveillance.
Herkommer K; Maier N; Ankerst DP; Schiele S; Gschwend JE; Meissner VH
World J Urol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):2499-2506. PubMed ID: 33048258
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of predictors of unfavorable pathological features in men eligible for active surveillance using radical prostatectomy specimens: a multi-institutional study.
Mizuno K; Inoue T; Kinoshita H; Yano T; Kawanishi H; Kanda H; Terada N; Kobayashi T; Kamba T; Mikami Y; Shiraishi T; Uemura Y; Imai Y; Honjo G; Shirase T; Okumura K; Kawakita M; Ogura K; Sugimura Y; Matsuda T; Ogawa O
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Dec; 46(12):1156-1161. PubMed ID: 27744325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Low serum total testosterone level as a predictor of upstaging and upgrading in low-risk prostate cancer patients meeting the inclusion criteria for active surveillance.
Ferro M; Lucarelli G; Bruzzese D; Di Lorenzo G; Perdonà S; Autorino R; Cantiello F; La Rocca R; Busetto GM; Cimmino A; Buonerba C; Battaglia M; Damiano R; De Cobelli O; Mirone V; Terracciano D
Oncotarget; 2017 Mar; 8(11):18424-18434. PubMed ID: 27793023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of Pathological and Oncologic Outcomes of Favorable Risk Gleason Score 3 + 4 and Low Risk Gleason Score 6 Prostate Cancer: Considerations for Active Surveillance.
Gearman DJ; Morlacco A; Cheville JC; Rangel LJ; Karnes RJ
J Urol; 2018 May; 199(5):1188-1195. PubMed ID: 29225057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathologic Outcomes of Gleason 6 Favorable Intermediate-Risk Prostate Cancer Treated With Radical Prostatectomy: Implications for Active Surveillance.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Vastola ME; Boldbaatar N; Labe SA; Nezolosky MD; Orio PF; King MT; Martin NE; Mouw KW; Trinh QD; Nguyen PL
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2018 Jun; 16(3):226-234. PubMed ID: 29196209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Feasibility for active surveillance in biopsy Gleason 3 + 4 prostate cancer: an Australian radical prostatectomy cohort.
Wong LM; Tang V; Peters J; Costello A; Corcoran N
BJU Int; 2016 Apr; 117 Suppl 4():82-7. PubMed ID: 27094971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prostate cancer in 432 men aged <50 years in the prostate-specific antigen era: a new outlook.
Gielchinsky I; Chang J; Cusick T; Delprado W; Nguyen Q; Yuen C; Savdie R; Böhm M; Haynes AM; Scheltema MJ; Stricker PD
BJU Int; 2018 Nov; 122 Suppl 5():35-41. PubMed ID: 30303599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pathologic outcomes for low-risk prostate cancer after delayed radical prostatectomy in the United States.
Weiner AB; Patel SG; Eggener SE
Urol Oncol; 2015 Apr; 33(4):164.e11-7. PubMed ID: 25624093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The pathological upgrading after radical prostatectomy in low-risk prostate cancer patients who are eligible for active surveillance: How safe is it to depend on bioptic pathology?
Verep S; Erdem S; Ozluk Y; Kilicaslan I; Sanli O; Ozcan F
Prostate; 2019 Sep; 79(13):1523-1529. PubMed ID: 31269285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Risk of Upgrading and Upstaging Among 10 000 Patients with Gleason 3+4 Favorable Intermediate-risk Prostate Cancer.
Yang DD; Mahal BA; Muralidhar V; Nezolosky MD; Vastola ME; Labe SA; Boldbaatar N; King MT; Martin NE; Orio PF; Beard CJ; Hoffman KE; Trinh QD; Spratt DE; Feng FY; Nguyen PL
Eur Urol Focus; 2019 Jan; 5(1):69-76. PubMed ID: 28753811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
