147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29804486)
1. Subcuticular interrupted versus continuous skin suturing in elective cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial.
Maged AM; Mohesen MN; Elhalwagy A; Abdelaal H; Almohamady M; Abdellatif AA; Alsawaf A; Malek KA; Nabil H; Fahmy RM; Wageih H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Dec; 32(24):4114-4119. PubMed ID: 29804486
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Superficial incisional surgical site infection rate after cesarean section in obese women: a randomized controlled trial of subcuticular versus interrupted skin suturing.
Ibrahim MI; Moustafa GF; Al-Hamid AS; Hussein MR
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 May; 289(5):981-6. PubMed ID: 24272023
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of suture materials for subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery.
Tuuli MG; Stout MJ; Martin S; Rampersad RM; Cahill AG; Macones GA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Oct; 215(4):490.e1-5. PubMed ID: 27179440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of staples vs subcuticular suture in class III obese women undergoing cesarean: a randomized controlled trial.
Zaki MN; Wing DA; McNulty JA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2018 Apr; 218(4):451.e1-451.e8. PubMed ID: 29474843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Subcuticular skin closure at cesarean delivery with poliglecaprone-25 vs polyglactin-910: a randomized controlled trial.
Sharma C; Sharma S; Soni A
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2024 Feb; 6(2):101256. PubMed ID: 38109995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Staples versus subcuticular suture for cesarean skin closure in obese women: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Han D; Feng L; Xu L; Li C; Zhang Q
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2022 Oct; 51(8):102420. PubMed ID: 35688324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A randomized controlled trial comparing cosmetic outcome after skin closure with 'staples' or 'subcuticular sutures' in emergency cesarean section.
Sharma C; Verma A; Soni A; Thusoo M; Mahajan VK; Verma S
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2014 Oct; 290(4):655-9. PubMed ID: 24816689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized trial comparing skin closure in cesarean section: interrupted suture with nylon vs subcuticular suture with No '1' polyfilament.
Shrestha A; Napit J; Neupane B; Sedhai LB
J Nepal Health Res Counc; 2013 Sep; 11(25):240-3. PubMed ID: 24908523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Absorbable subcuticular staples versus suture for caesarean section closure: a randomised clinical trial.
Madsen AM; Dow ML; Lohse CM; Tessmer-Tuck JA
BJOG; 2019 Mar; 126(4):502-510. PubMed ID: 30461155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Wound complications in obese women after cesarean: a comparison of staples versus subcuticular suture.
Zaki MN; Truong M; Pyra M; Kominiarek MA; Irwin T
J Perinatol; 2016 Oct; 36(10):819-22. PubMed ID: 27253895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Nov; 11(11):CD003577. PubMed ID: 23152219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Subcuticular sutures versus staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a meta-analysis.
Wang H; Hong S; Teng H; Qiao L; Yin H
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2016 Nov; 29(22):3705-11. PubMed ID: 26785886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cesarean wound closure in body mass index 40 or greater comparing suture to staples: a randomized clinical trial.
Rodel RL; Gray KM; Quiner TE; Bodea Braescu A; Gerkin R; Perlow JH
Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM; 2021 Jan; 3(1):100271. PubMed ID: 33451603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A randomized study comparing skin closure in cesarean sections: staples vs subcuticular sutures.
Rousseau JA; Girard K; Turcot-Lemay L; Thomas N
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Mar; 200(3):265.e1-4. PubMed ID: 19254586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section.
Mackeen AD; Berghella V; Larsen ML
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2012 Sep; (9):CD003577. PubMed ID: 22972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture.
Frishman GN; Schwartz T; Hogan JW
J Reprod Med; 1997 Oct; 42(10):627-30. PubMed ID: 9350017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Subcuticular Suture Type for Skin Closure After Cesarean Delivery: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
Buresch AM; Van Arsdale A; Ferzli M; Sahasrabudhe N; Sun M; Bernstein J; Bernstein PS; Ngai IM; Garry DJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Sep; 130(3):521-526. PubMed ID: 28796687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of evidence-based interventions on wound complications after cesarean delivery.
Temming LA; Raghuraman N; Carter EB; Stout MJ; Rampersad RM; Macones GA; Cahill AG; Tuuli MG
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 217(4):449.e1-449.e9. PubMed ID: 28601567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Skin closure at cesarean delivery, glue vs subcuticular sutures: a randomized controlled trial.
Daykan Y; Sharon-Weiner M; Pasternak Y; Tzadikevitch-Geffen K; Markovitch O; Sukenik-Halevy R; Biron-Shental T
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Apr; 216(4):406.e1-406.e5. PubMed ID: 28153666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of subcutaneous tissue closure technique in cesarean section on postoperative wound complications in obese Egyptian women.
Alalfy M; Elgazzar A; Fares T; Nagy O; Ellithy A; Lasheen Y; Kamel A; Soliman M; Hassan A; Samy A; Taher AM; Ogila AI; Saad H; Salah H; Ramadan M; Nabil M; Hatem DL; Fikry M
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Aug; 32(15):2452-2459. PubMed ID: 29415592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
