147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 29804486)
21. Comparing running vs interrupted sutures for skin closure: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Luo W; Tao Y; Wang Y; Ouyang Z; Huang J; Long X
Int Wound J; 2023 Jan; 20(1):210-220. PubMed ID: 35715955
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Surgical staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Figueroa D; Jauk VC; Szychowski JM; Garner R; Biggio JR; Andrews WW; Hauth J; Tita AT
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Jan; 121(1):33-8. PubMed ID: 23262925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Effect of Adhesive Strips and Dermal Sutures vs Dermal Sutures Only on Wound Closure: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Custis T; Armstrong AW; King TH; Sharon VR; Eisen DB
JAMA Dermatol; 2015 Aug; 151(8):862-7. PubMed ID: 25875131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Barbed sutures versus conventional sutures for uterine closure at cesarean section; a randomized controlled trial.
Zayed MA; Fouda UM; Elsetohy KA; Zayed SM; Hashem AT; Youssef MA
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Mar; 32(5):710-717. PubMed ID: 29082807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Randomized controlled trial comparing subcuticular absorbable suture with conventional interrupted suture for wound closure at elective operation of colon cancer.
Tanaka A; Sadahiro S; Suzuki T; Okada K; Saito G
Surgery; 2014 Mar; 155(3):486-92. PubMed ID: 24439741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Incidence of wound complications in cesarean deliveries following closure with absorbable subcuticular staples versus conventional skin closure techniques.
Schrufer-Poland TL; Ruiz MP; Kassar S; Tomassian C; Algren SD; Yeast JD
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2016 Nov; 206():53-56. PubMed ID: 27632411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Skin and subcutaneous fascia closure at caesarean section to reduce wound complications: the closure randomised trial.
Poprzeczny AJ; Grivell RM; Louise J; Deussen AR; Dodd JM
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2020 Oct; 20(1):606. PubMed ID: 33032560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of Wound Infection in Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis by Subcuticular Suture and Interrupted Suture.
Zarei F; Ahmadinejad M
Infect Disord Drug Targets; 2021 Sep; 21(6):e270421190327. PubMed ID: 33459249
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Suture versus staples for skin closure after cesarean: a metaanalysis.
Mackeen AD; Schuster M; Berghella V
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2015 May; 212(5):621.e1-10. PubMed ID: 25530592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Subcuticular suture compared with staples for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a randomized controlled trial.
Aabakke AJM; Krebs L; Pipper CB; Secher NJ
Obstet Gynecol; 2013 Oct; 122(4):878-884. PubMed ID: 24084548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Subcuticular Suture Type at Cesarean Delivery and Infection Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Sobodu O; Nash CM; Stairs J
J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2024 Jan; 46(1):102191. PubMed ID: 37595945
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Subcutaneous drain vs. suture in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery. A prospective, randomized trial.
Allaire AD; Fisch J; McMahon MJ
J Reprod Med; 2000 Apr; 45(4):327-31. PubMed ID: 10804490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Closure methods for laparotomy incisions for preventing incisional hernias and other wound complications.
Patel SV; Paskar DD; Nelson RL; Vedula SS; Steele SR
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Nov; 11(11):CD005661. PubMed ID: 29099149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. A combination of subcuticular sutures and a drain for skin closure reduces wound complications in obese women undergoing surgery using vertical incisions.
Inotsume-Kojima Y; Uchida T; Abe M; Doi T; Kanayama N
J Hosp Infect; 2011 Feb; 77(2):162-5. PubMed ID: 20971528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Patient satisfaction and cosmetic outcome in a randomized study of cesarean skin closure.
Fleisher J; Khalifeh A; Pettker C; Berghella V; Dabbish N; Mackeen AD
J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2019 Nov; 32(22):3830-3835. PubMed ID: 29739243
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
36. Staples vs subcuticular sutures for skin closure at cesarean delivery: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials.
Clay FS; Walsh CA; Walsh SR
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2011 May; 204(5):378-83. PubMed ID: 21195384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Clinical Equivalence of Monoglyde® and Monocryl® Absorbable Poliglecaprone-25 Sutures: A Single-Blind, Randomized Study.
Sailakshmi M; Misra S; Hs S; Acharya S; Moharana AK; Ts D
Cureus; 2023 May; 15(5):e38938. PubMed ID: 37309337
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Staples compared with subcuticular suture for skin closure after cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Tuuli MG; Rampersad RM; Carbone JF; Stamilio D; Macones GA; Odibo AO
Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Mar; 117(3):682-690. PubMed ID: 21343772
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Subcutaneous tissue reapproximation, alone or in combination with drain, in obese women undergoing cesarean delivery.
Ramsey PS; White AM; Guinn DA; Lu GC; Ramin SM; Davies JK; Neely CL; Newby C; Fonseca L; Case AS; Kaslow RA; Kirby RS; Rouse DJ; Hauth JC
Obstet Gynecol; 2005 May; 105(5 Pt 1):967-73. PubMed ID: 15863532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Does Time of Wound Complication after Cesarean Delivery Differ by Type of Skin Closure?
Cooper SM; Blanchard CT; Szychowski JM; Tita ATN
Am J Perinatol; 2019 Jul; 36(9):981-984. PubMed ID: 30477032
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
